• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同氮肥对摩西管柄囊霉活性、葡萄营养及果实成分的影响。

Effects of different N fertilizers on the activity of Glomus mosseae and on grapevine nutrition and berry composition.

作者信息

Karagiannidis N, Nikolaou N, Ipsilantis I, Zioziou E

机构信息

Soil Science Lab, Technological and Educational Institute of Thessaloniki, 54101, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Department of Agriculture, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124, Thessaloniki, Greece.

出版信息

Mycorrhiza. 2007 Dec;18(1):43-50. doi: 10.1007/s00572-007-0153-2. Epub 2007 Nov 7.

DOI:10.1007/s00572-007-0153-2
PMID:17987325
Abstract

Grapevine N fertilization may affect and be affected by arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungal colonization and change berry composition. We studied the effects of different N fertilizers on AM fungal grapevine root colonization and sporulation, and on grapevine growth, nutrition, and berry composition, by conducting a 3.5-year pot study supplying grapevine plants with either urea, calcium nitrate, ammonium sulfate, or ammonium nitrate. We measured the percentage of AM fungal root colonization, AM fungal sporulation, grapevine shoot dry weight and number of leaves, nutrient composition (macro- and micronutrients), and grapevine berry soluble solids (total sugars or degrees Brix) and total acidity. Urea suppressed AM fungal root colonization and sporulation. Mycorrhizal grapevine plants had higher shoot dry weight and number of leaves than non-mycorrhizal and with a higher growth response with calcium nitrate as the N source. For the macronutrients P and K, and for the micronutrient B, leaf concentration was higher in mycorrhizal plants. Non-mycorrhizal plants had higher concentration of microelements Zn, Mn, Fe, and Cu than mycorrhizal. There were no differences in soluble solids ( degrees Brix) in grapevine berries among mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal plants. However, non-mycorrhizal grapevine berries had higher acid content with ammonium nitrate, although they did not have better N nutrition and vegetative growth.

摘要

葡萄树施氮可能会影响丛枝菌根(AM)真菌的定殖,同时也会受到其影响,并改变浆果成分。我们通过一项为期3.5年的盆栽试验,向葡萄植株供应尿素、硝酸钙、硫酸铵或硝酸铵,研究了不同氮肥对AM真菌在葡萄树根中的定殖和产孢,以及对葡萄树生长、营养和浆果成分的影响。我们测量了AM真菌根定殖的百分比、AM真菌的产孢量、葡萄新梢干重和叶片数量、营养成分(大量和微量营养素),以及葡萄浆果的可溶性固形物(总糖或波美度)和总酸度。尿素抑制了AM真菌的根定殖和产孢。与非菌根葡萄树相比,菌根葡萄树的新梢干重和叶片数量更高,且以硝酸钙作为氮源时生长反应更强。对于大量营养素磷和钾以及微量元素硼,菌根植物叶片中的浓度更高。非菌根植物中微量元素锌、锰、铁和铜的浓度高于菌根植物。菌根和非菌根葡萄树的浆果中可溶性固形物(波美度)没有差异。然而,非菌根葡萄树的浆果在施用硝酸铵时酸含量更高,尽管它们的氮营养和营养生长并不更好。

相似文献

1
Effects of different N fertilizers on the activity of Glomus mosseae and on grapevine nutrition and berry composition.不同氮肥对摩西管柄囊霉活性、葡萄营养及果实成分的影响。
Mycorrhiza. 2007 Dec;18(1):43-50. doi: 10.1007/s00572-007-0153-2. Epub 2007 Nov 7.
2
Weed control and cover crop management affect mycorrhizal colonization of grapevine roots and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal spore populations in a California vineyard.杂草控制和覆盖作物管理会影响加利福尼亚葡萄园葡萄根系的菌根定殖以及丛枝菌根真菌孢子种群。
Mycorrhiza. 2005 Mar;15(2):111-9. doi: 10.1007/s00572-004-0309-2. Epub 2004 May 7.
3
Impact of an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus versus a mixed microbial inoculum on the transcriptome reprogramming of grapevine roots.丛枝菌根真菌与混合微生物接种剂对葡萄根系转录组重编程的影响
Mycorrhiza. 2017 Jul;27(5):417-430. doi: 10.1007/s00572-016-0754-8. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
4
Plant Identity Exerts Stronger Effect than Fertilization on Soil Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in a Sown Pasture.在人工播种的牧场中,植物种类对土壤丛枝菌根真菌的影响比施肥更为显著。
Microb Ecol. 2016 Oct;72(3):647-58. doi: 10.1007/s00248-016-0817-6. Epub 2016 Jul 16.
5
Role of arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in root mineral uptake under CaCO3 stress.丛枝菌根共生在碳酸钙胁迫下根系对矿物质吸收中的作用。
Mycorrhiza. 2012 Jul;22(5):337-45. doi: 10.1007/s00572-011-0405-z. Epub 2011 Aug 25.
6
Colonization by the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus versiforme induces a defense response against the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita in the grapevine (Vitis amurensis Rupr.), which includes transcriptional activation of the class III chitinase gene VCH3.丛枝菌根真菌珠状巨孢囊霉的定殖会诱导葡萄(山葡萄)对根结线虫南方根结线虫产生防御反应,其中包括III类几丁质酶基因VCH3的转录激活。
Plant Cell Physiol. 2006 Jan;47(1):154-63. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pci231. Epub 2005 Dec 2.
7
Individual and interactive role of Trichoderma viride and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on growth and pigment content of onion plants.绿色木霉和丛枝菌根真菌对洋葱生长和色素含量的单独和交互作用。
Lett Appl Microbiol. 2020 Feb;70(2):79-86. doi: 10.1111/lam.13246. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
8
[Effects of fertilization on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in Elymus nutans roots].施肥对垂穗披碱草根系丛枝菌根真菌的影响
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2011 Dec;22(12):3131-7.
9
Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) colonization on terpene emission and content of Artemisia annua L.丛枝菌根(AM)定殖对黄花蒿萜类物质释放及含量的影响
Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2008 Jan;10(1):108-22. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-964963.
10
Interactive effects of temperature and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on growth, P uptake and root respiration of Capsicum annuum L.温度与丛枝菌根真菌对辣椒生长、磷吸收及根系呼吸的交互作用
Mycorrhiza. 2004 Aug;14(4):241-4. doi: 10.1007/s00572-003-0261-6. Epub 2003 Aug 21.

引用本文的文献

1
A 3-year application of different mycorrhiza-based plant biostimulants distinctively modulates photosynthetic performance, leaf metabolism, and fruit quality in grapes ( L.).对葡萄(Vitis vinifera L.)连续三年施用不同的基于菌根的植物生物刺激剂,可显著调节其光合性能、叶片代谢和果实品质。
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Aug 29;14:1236199. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1236199. eCollection 2023.
2
Adaptability of Wild-Growing Tulips of Greece: Uncovering Relationships between Soil Properties, Rhizosphere Fungal Morphotypes and Nutrient Content Profiles.希腊野生郁金香的适应性:揭示土壤性质、根际真菌形态类型与养分含量概况之间的关系。
Biology (Basel). 2023 Apr 16;12(4):605. doi: 10.3390/biology12040605.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Variation in nitrogen-15 natural abundance and nitrogen uptake traits among co-occurring alpine species: do species partition by nitrogen form?共生高山物种间氮-15自然丰度及氮吸收特性的差异:物种是否按氮形态进行划分?
Oecologia. 2002 Feb;130(4):609-616. doi: 10.1007/s00442-001-0838-8. Epub 2002 Feb 1.
2
Response to ammonium and nitrate by a mycorrhizal annual invasive grass and native shrub in southern California.对南加州地区菌根一年生入侵草本植物和乡土灌木对铵态氮和硝态氮的响应。
Am J Bot. 2001 Aug;88(8):1430-6.
3
Nitrate assimilation in Lotus japonicus.
Soil Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungal Communities Differentially Affect Growth and Nutrient Uptake by Grapevine Rootstocks.
土壤丛枝菌根真菌群落对葡萄砧木生长和养分吸收的影响存在差异。
Microb Ecol. 2023 Aug;86(2):1035-1049. doi: 10.1007/s00248-022-02160-z. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
4
Arbuscular Mycrorrhizal Fungi Inoculation and Applied Water Amounts Modulate the Response of Young Grapevines to Mild Water Stress in a Hyper-Arid Season.丛枝菌根真菌接种和施水量调节了幼龄葡萄树在超干旱季节对轻度水分胁迫的响应。
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Jan 14;11:622209. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.622209. eCollection 2020.
5
Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Symbiosis as a Promising Resource for Improving Berry Quality in Grapevines Under Changing Environments.丛枝菌根共生作为在不断变化的环境下改善葡萄果实品质的一种有前景的资源
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Jun 29;9:897. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00897. eCollection 2018.
6
Wetland plant species improve performance when inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: a meta-analysis of experimental pot studies.湿地植物物种在接种丛枝菌根真菌时会提高性能:实验盆栽研究的荟萃分析。
Mycorrhiza. 2018 Aug;28(5-6):477-493. doi: 10.1007/s00572-018-0839-7. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
7
Transcriptional induction of two phosphate transporter 1 genes and enhanced root branching in grape plants inoculated with Funneliformis mosseae.接种摩西管柄囊霉后,葡萄植株中两个磷酸盐转运蛋白 1 基因的转录诱导和根系分枝增强。
Mycorrhiza. 2018 Feb;28(2):179-185. doi: 10.1007/s00572-017-0809-5. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
8
Nitrogen and carbon/nitrogen dynamics in arbuscular mycorrhiza: the great unknown.丛枝菌根中的氮和碳/氮动态:巨大的未知领域。
Mycorrhiza. 2015 Oct;25(7):499-515. doi: 10.1007/s00572-015-0627-6. Epub 2015 Feb 14.
9
Local and systemic mycorrhiza-induced protection against the ectoparasitic nematode Xiphinema index involves priming of defence gene responses in grapevine.局部和系统菌根诱导对寄生线虫 Xiphinema index 的保护作用涉及葡萄防御基因反应的激活。
J Exp Bot. 2012 Jun;63(10):3657-72. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers046. Epub 2012 Mar 9.
10
Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis elicits proteome responses opposite of P-starvation in SO4 grapevine rootstock upon root colonisation with two Glomus species.丛枝菌根共生会引发 SO4 葡萄砧木根系定植两种球囊霉属真菌后与 P 饥饿相反的蛋白质组反应。
Mycorrhiza. 2011 Aug;21(6):473-493. doi: 10.1007/s00572-010-0352-0. Epub 2011 Jan 6.
日本百脉根中的硝酸盐同化作用。
J Exp Bot. 2005 Jul;56(417):1741-9. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eri171. Epub 2005 May 23.
4
Mycorrhizal C costs and nutritional benefits in developing grapevines.发育中葡萄藤的菌根碳成本和营养效益
Mycorrhiza. 2005 May;15(3):159-65. doi: 10.1007/s00572-004-0317-2. Epub 2004 Jul 23.
5
Preferential uptake of soil nitrogen forms by grassland plant species.草原植物物种对土壤氮形态的优先吸收
Oecologia. 2005 Feb;142(4):627-35. doi: 10.1007/s00442-004-1765-2. Epub 2004 Nov 10.
6
Organic and inorganic nitrogen nutrition of western red cedar, western hemlock and salal in mineral N-limited cedar-hemlock forests.在氮素受限的铁杉-雪松森林中,西部红雪松、西部铁杉和桂叶山月桂的有机和无机氮营养
Oecologia. 2004 Nov;141(3):468-76. doi: 10.1007/s00442-004-1622-3. Epub 2004 Aug 20.
7
Functional aspects of root architecture and mycorrhizal inoculation with respect to nutrient uptake capacity.根系结构与菌根接种在养分吸收能力方面的功能特性。
Mycorrhiza. 2004 Jul;14(3):177-84. doi: 10.1007/s00572-003-0254-5. Epub 2003 Jul 10.
8
Cellular and subcellular localisation of glutamine synthetase and glutamate dehydrogenase in grapes gives new insights on the regulation of carbon and nitrogen metabolism.葡萄中谷氨酰胺合成酶和谷氨酸脱氢酶的细胞及亚细胞定位为碳氮代谢调控提供了新见解。
Planta. 2002 Dec;216(2):245-54. doi: 10.1007/s00425-002-0854-x. Epub 2002 Aug 27.
9
Immunocharacterization of Vitis vinifera L. ferredoxin-dependent glutamate synthase, and its spatial and temporal changes during leaf development.葡萄(Vitis vinifera L.)铁氧还蛋白依赖性谷氨酸合酶的免疫特性及其在叶片发育过程中的时空变化
Planta. 2002 Aug;215(4):630-8. doi: 10.1007/s00425-002-0785-6. Epub 2002 May 21.
10
The contribution of roots and shoots to whole plant nitrate reduction in fast- and slow-growing grass species.快速生长和慢速生长草种的根与地上部分对整株植物硝酸盐还原的贡献。
J Exp Bot. 2002 Jul;53(374):1635-42. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erf008.