• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Errors of intravenous fluid infusion rates in medical inpatients.住院患者静脉输液速率的误差
Clin Med (Lond). 2007 Oct;7(5):482-5. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.7-5-482.
2
Factors predictive of intravenous fluid administration errors in Australian surgical care wards.澳大利亚外科护理病房静脉输液给药错误的预测因素。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Jun;14(3):179-84. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2004.010728.
3
A Multi-hospital Before-After Observational Study Using a Point-Prevalence Approach with an Infusion Safety Intervention Bundle to Reduce Intravenous Medication Administration Errors.多医院前后观察性研究采用点患病率方法和输液安全干预包,以减少静脉药物给药错误。
Drug Saf. 2018 Jun;41(6):591-602. doi: 10.1007/s40264-018-0637-3.
4
Insights from the sharp end of intravenous medication errors: implications for infusion pump technology.静脉用药错误尖锐问题的见解:对输液泵技术的启示。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Apr;14(2):80-6. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2004.011957.
5
Use of failure mode and effects analysis in improving the safety of i.v. drug administration.失效模式与效应分析在提高静脉药物给药安全性中的应用。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2005 May 1;62(9):917-20. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/62.9.917.
6
Right programming of pumps to prevent errors in the infusion process.正确设置输液泵程序以防止输液过程中出现差错。
Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2003 Jan;29(1):37-40, 1. doi: 10.1016/s1549-3741(03)29005-5.
7
Smart pumps help crack the safety code.智能泵有助于破解安全密码。
Nurs Manage. 2004 May;35(5):49-51. doi: 10.1097/00006247-200405000-00015.
8
Smart i.v. pumps.智能静脉输液泵
RN. 2005 Dec;68(12):38-43; quiz 44.
9
Exploring the Current Landscape of Intravenous Infusion Practices and Errors (ECLIPSE): protocol for a mixed-methods observational study.探索静脉输液实践与差错的现状(ECLIPSE):一项混合方法观察性研究的方案
BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 3;6(3):e009777. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009777.
10
Impact of computerized orders for pediatric continuous drug infusions on detecting infusion pump programming errors: a simulated study.计算机化医嘱对小儿持续药物输注中输液泵编程错误检测的影响:一项模拟研究。
J Pediatr Nurs. 2010 Apr;25(2):108-18. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2008.10.002. Epub 2009 Apr 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhanced accuracy in gravity-based intravenous infusion using pulse oximeter drop counting and measured single-drop weights.使用脉搏血氧仪液滴计数和测量的单滴重量提高基于重力的静脉输液的准确性。
Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2025 Jul;20(3):230-241. doi: 10.17085/apm.25207. Epub 2025 Jul 31.
2
Understanding temperature-rain data using ID3 based concept reduction technique in FCA.在形式概念分析中使用基于ID3的概念约简技术理解温度-降雨数据。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 25;15(1):18207. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-02652-1.
3
Reliability of Marked Scales on Intravenous Fluid Plastic Bags.静脉输液塑料瓶刻度标记的可靠性。
J Korean Med Sci. 2022 Dec 19;37(49):e345. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e345.
4
Where do nursing students make mistakes when calculating drug doses? A retrospective study.护理专业学生在计算药物剂量时会在哪里出错?一项回顾性研究。
BMC Nurs. 2022 Nov 10;21(1):309. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-01085-9.
5
Advantages in Management and Remote Monitoring of Intravenous Therapy: Exploratory Survey and Economic Evaluation of Gravity-Based Infusions in Finland.静脉治疗的管理和远程监测优势:芬兰重力输液的探索性调查和经济评估。
Adv Ther. 2022 May;39(5):2096-2108. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02093-6. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
6
Introducing NICE guidelines for intravenous fluid therapy into a district general hospital.将 NICE 静脉输液治疗指南引入地区综合医院。
BMJ Open Qual. 2022 Feb;11(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001636.
7
Diagnosis and Management of Acute Heart Failure in Sub-Saharan Africa.撒哈拉以南非洲地区急性心力衰竭的诊断与管理。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2019 Aug 31;21(10):120. doi: 10.1007/s11886-019-1200-2.
8
Computational framework for predictive PBPK-PD-Tox simulations of opioids and antidotes.用于预测性 PBPK-PD-Tox 模拟的计算框架,用于阿片类药物和解毒剂。
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2019 Dec;46(6):513-529. doi: 10.1007/s10928-019-09648-1. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
9
How Do Simulated Error Experiences Impact Attitudes Related to Error Prevention?模拟错误体验如何影响与预防错误相关的态度?
Simul Healthc. 2016 Oct;11(5):323-333. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000174.
10
On-going lessons in fluid prescription: assessment of adherence to weight-based intravenous fluid prescribing in medical inpatients.液体处方的持续经验教训:对内科住院患者基于体重的静脉输液处方依从性的评估
Clin Med (Lond). 2015 Oct;15(5):503-4. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.15-5-503.

住院患者静脉输液速率的误差

Errors of intravenous fluid infusion rates in medical inpatients.

作者信息

Rooker Jemma C, Gorard David A

机构信息

Wycombe Hospital, High Wycombe.

出版信息

Clin Med (Lond). 2007 Oct;7(5):482-5. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.7-5-482.

DOI:10.7861/clinmedicine.7-5-482
PMID:17990717
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4953047/
Abstract

Prescriptions for intravenous (i.v.) fluids in hospitals may not be closely adhered to. This study prospectively examined whether prescribed i.v. fluids are administered at the correct rate. During a four-week period, the i.v. infusion rates in patients requiring continuous i.v. fluids and cared for by a single medical team in a district hospital were studied. The periods over which i.v. crystalloid fluid bags were administered were compared with the time prescribed. Of a total 207 bags, 53 (26%) were correctly administered at the prescribed rate (percentage error 10% to -10%), 138 bags (67%) were infused too slowly and 16 bags (8%) were infused too fast. Overall, the median (interquartile range) absolute percentage error (positive or negative) for all infused bags was 23% (9.7-50). Thirty-nine per cent of bags were infused accurately when a metered pump was used, compared to 21% of bags infused accurately when a metered pump was not used (p < 0.01). Marked inaccuracies in i.v. fluid infusion rates are common, and do not seem to be perceived by staff as important. Metered pumps improve accuracy. Increased awareness of such errors, and the routine use of metered pumps should help improve the accuracy of i.v. fluid infusion rates.

摘要

医院中静脉输液的处方可能未得到严格遵守。本研究前瞻性地考察了静脉输液是否按正确速率给药。在为期四周的时间里,对一家地区医院中由单一医疗团队护理的需要持续静脉输液的患者的静脉输液速率进行了研究。将静脉输注晶体液袋的时长与规定时间进行比较。在总共207袋输液中,53袋(26%)以规定速率正确给药(百分比误差在10%至 -10%之间),138袋(67%)输注过慢,16袋(8%)输注过快。总体而言,所有输注袋的中位(四分位间距)绝对百分比误差(正或负)为23%(9.7 - 50)。使用定量泵时,39%的输液袋输注准确,而未使用定量泵时,这一比例为21%(p < 0.01)。静脉输液速率存在明显不准确的情况很常见,而且工作人员似乎并未将其视为重要问题。定量泵可提高准确性。提高对此类误差的认识以及常规使用定量泵应有助于提高静脉输液速率的准确性。