Lachmann Stefan, Kimmerle-Müller Evi, Axmann Detlef, Gomez-Roman German, Weber Heiner, Haas Robert
Department of Oral Surgery, Bernhard Gottlieb University Dental School, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Dec;18(6):686-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01399.x.
To assess the performance of clinical, microbiological, and immunological diagnosis of peri-implant health and the influence of professional hygiene measures on them.
Twenty-one edentulous patients with oral implants supporting a lower overdenture were followed up over 3 months beginning 1 week before their annual recall visit. Hygiene scores, probing depth, bleeding on probing (BOP), implant stability, gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) volume, sulcular interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) concentrations, and relative concentrations of five bacterial species (polymerase chain reaction) were investigated. Measurement variation was assessed as a function of (a) intra- and (b) inter-examiner reliability, (c) inter-implant variation in each patient, (d) time, and (e) effect of hygiene measures by accuracy, repeatability, reproducibility, and visualization with the Bland and Altman Plot.
Measurement means and accuracy (in parentheses) were as follows: GCF volume 1.5 microl (1.5), Interleukin-1beta 8 ng/ml (26), PGE2 63 ng/ml (185), bacteria sum score 0.2 (0.7), plaque score 1 (1), BOP score 0 (1), Periotest value -4 (3), resonance frequency analysis ISQ 66 (11), and pocket probing depth 2.3 mm (0.7). No finding exhibited any statistically significant measurement variation as explained by accuracy, repeatability, or reproducibility. Bland and Altman Plots revealed insufficient agreement for replicated BOP assessments. A short post-treatment reduction in plaque and BOP scores was visually apparent. Still, professional oral hygiene measures exerted no sustained influence on the clinical and biochemical appearance of the peri-implant tissues.
All findings except BOP showed statistically acceptable repeatability and moderate vulnerability to influences present 'chairside' in clinical practice.
评估种植体周围健康状况的临床、微生物学和免疫学诊断性能,以及专业卫生措施对其的影响。
21例佩戴下颌覆盖义齿且种植体支持的无牙患者,从年度复诊前1周开始进行为期3个月的随访。研究了卫生评分、探诊深度、探诊出血(BOP)、种植体稳定性、龈沟液(GCF)量、龈沟白细胞介素-1β(IL-1β)和前列腺素E2(PGE2)浓度,以及五种细菌种类的相对浓度(聚合酶链反应)。测量变异作为以下因素的函数进行评估:(a)检查者内和(b)检查者间的可靠性,(c)每位患者种植体间的变异,(d)时间,以及(e)卫生措施的效果,采用Bland和Altman图通过准确性、重复性、再现性和可视化进行评估。
测量均值及准确性(括号内)如下:GCF量1.5微升(1.5),白细胞介素-1β 8纳克/毫升(26),PGE2 63纳克/毫升(185),细菌总分0.2(0.7),菌斑评分1(1),BOP评分0(1),Periotest值-4(3),共振频率分析ISQ 66(11),以及袋探诊深度2.3毫米(0.7)。如准确性、重复性或再现性所解释,没有发现任何具有统计学意义的测量变异。Bland和Altman图显示重复BOP评估的一致性不足。治疗后短期内菌斑和BOP评分的降低在视觉上很明显。然而,专业的口腔卫生措施对种植体周围组织的临床和生化表现没有持续影响。
除BOP外,所有结果均显示出统计学上可接受的重复性,并且在临床实践中对“椅旁”存在的影响具有中等易感性。