El-Khuffash Afif, Higgins Mary, Walsh Kevin, Molloy Eleanor J
Department of Neonatology, National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Neonatology. 2008;93(3):206-12. doi: 10.1159/000110869. Epub 2007 Nov 9.
BACKGROUND: Determining the significance of a patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) remains difficult in preterm neonates and current echocardiographic markers give little information about ductal steal. We hypothesized that the relationship between celiac artery flow (CAF) and left ventricular output (LVO) in the presence of a PDA may determine haemodynamic significance. OBJECTIVES: To examine CAF to LVO ratio (CAF:LVO) in the presence and the absence of a PDA in preterm neonates, and to compare CAF:LVO to current echocardiographic markers of a significant PDA. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of neonates <1,500 g. Echocardiography was performed at 12 h and day 3. PDA, LVO and CAF were measured by echocardiography. The infants were divided into those who developed a significant PDA (PDA >1.4 mm and left atrial to aortic ratio >1.5 on day 3) and controls. A further assessment was carried out following successful PDA treatment with ibuprofen or surgical ligation. RESULTS: A total of 33 infants were enrolled. 19 infants had a PDA (median gestation 27 weeks, birth weight 915 g), and 14 controls (gestation 28.7 weeks, birth weight 1,110 g). At 12 h, there was no difference in CAF, LVO or CAF:LVO. On day 3, there was a significant difference in CAF:LVO between PDA versus control groups. CAF:LVO significantly correlated with conventional markers of ductal significance. A CAF:LVO value of 0.10 had a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 78% for the presence of a significant PDA. Following successful PDA treatment CAF:LVO returned to levels similar to controls. CONCLUSION: CAF:LVO may be used to determine which PDA warrants treatment and serve as a marker of treatment success. Trials are needed to correlate CAF:LVO with outcome and the impact of basing PDA treatment on this ratio.
背景:在早产儿中确定动脉导管未闭(PDA)的意义仍然困难,并且目前的超声心动图标志物几乎没有提供关于导管窃血的信息。我们假设在存在PDA的情况下,腹腔动脉血流(CAF)与左心室输出量(LVO)之间的关系可能决定血流动力学意义。 目的:检查早产儿存在和不存在PDA时的CAF与LVO比值(CAF:LVO),并将CAF:LVO与目前提示PDA有意义的超声心动图标志物进行比较。 方法:这是一项对体重<1500g新生儿的前瞻性观察研究。在出生后12小时和第3天进行超声心动图检查。通过超声心动图测量PDA、LVO和CAF。将婴儿分为发生有意义PDA(第3天PDA>1.4mm且左心房与主动脉比值>1.5)的婴儿和对照组。在用布洛芬或手术结扎成功治疗PDA后进行进一步评估。 结果:共纳入33例婴儿。19例婴儿有PDA(中位孕周27周,出生体重915g),14例为对照组(孕周28.7周,出生体重1110g)。在12小时时,CAF、LVO或CAF:LVO无差异。在第3天,PDA组与对照组之间的CAF:LVO有显著差异。CAF:LVO与导管意义的传统标志物显著相关。CAF:LVO值为0.10时,对于存在有意义PDA的敏感性为93%,特异性为78%。PDA成功治疗后,CAF:LVO恢复到与对照组相似的水平。 结论:CAF:LVO可用于确定哪些PDA需要治疗,并作为治疗成功的标志物。需要进行试验以将CAF:LVO与结局相关联,以及基于该比值进行PDA治疗的影响。
Early Hum Dev. 2004-6
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005-9
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2010-6-7
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2008-7
Semin Perinatol. 2023-3
Front Pediatr. 2020-9-11
J Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2017-12