Suppr超能文献

晚期黑色素瘤的靶向联合抗炎和血管生成抑制治疗:一项随机II期试验

Targeted combined anti-inflammatory and angiostatic therapy in advanced melanoma: a randomized phase II trial.

作者信息

Reichle Albrecht, Vogt Thomas, Coras Brigitte, Terheyden Peter, Neuber Klaus, Trefzer Uwe, Schultz Erwin, Berand Anna, Bröcker E B, Landthaler Michael, Andreesen Reinhard

机构信息

Department of Hematology/Oncology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

出版信息

Melanoma Res. 2007 Dec;17(6):360-4. doi: 10.1097/CMR.0b013e3282f1d2c8.

Abstract

An angiostatic approach was used to assess the impact of anti-inflammatory therapy in combination with metronomic low-dose chemotherapy. A randomized multi-institutional phase II trial was designed to select metronomic chemotherapy (arm A: trofosfamide 50 mg orally three times daily, day 1+) or combined anti-inflammatory/angiostatic treatment (arm B: trofosfamide as above mentioned plus rofecoxib 25 mg orally, day 1+, and pioglitazone 60 mg orally, day 1+) for further evaluation. A total of 76 patients, mostly (>60%) refractory to at least one previous chemotherapy with maximum tolerated doses, and progression of metastatic melanoma were included. The estimated progression-free survival (PFS) rates at one year were 0% for metronomic chemotherapy (A), but 9% for additional anti-inflammatory therapy (B). Vice versa the hazard ratio for the intent-to-treat analysis of A versus B was 1.9 (P=0.008). By Cox analysis, the impact of anti-inflammatory therapy on PFS achieved significance (P=0.016) as well as C-reactive protein response on overall survival (P=0.045). WHO grade 3 (no grade 4) toxicities were reported in arm A/B in 19 and 28%, respectively. In conclusion, control of tumour-associated inflammatory processes (C-reactive protein response) is associated with longer PFS than achieved with metronomic chemotherapy alone in metastatic melanoma.

摘要

采用血管生成抑制方法评估抗炎治疗联合节拍性低剂量化疗的效果。设计了一项随机多机构II期试验,以选择节拍性化疗(A组:曲磷胺50毫克,口服,每日三次,第1天起)或联合抗炎/血管生成抑制治疗(B组:上述曲磷胺加罗非昔布25毫克,口服,第1天起,以及吡格列酮60毫克,口服,第1天起)进行进一步评估。共纳入76例患者,大多数(>60%)对至少一种先前的最大耐受剂量化疗难治,且患有转移性黑色素瘤并出现进展。节拍性化疗(A组)一年的无进展生存(PFS)率估计为0%,但联合抗炎治疗(B组)为9%。反之,A组与B组意向性治疗分析的风险比为1.9(P = 0.008)。通过Cox分析,抗炎治疗对PFS的影响具有显著性(P = 0.016),C反应蛋白反应对总生存的影响也具有显著性(P = 0.045)。A组和B组分别有19%和28%报告出现WHO 3级(无4级)毒性反应。总之,在转移性黑色素瘤中,控制肿瘤相关炎症过程(C反应蛋白反应)与比单独使用节拍性化疗更长的PFS相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验