Stoet Gijsbert, Snyder Lawrence H
Institute of Psychological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, England.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2007 Sep;7(3):192-7. doi: 10.3758/cabn.7.3.192.
Numerous human task-switching studies have shown that decision making that follows a task switch is slower and less accurate than that which follows a task repetition. Stoet and Snyder tested humans and rhesus monkeys on a task-switching paradigm, but found, surprisingly, no switch costs in the monkeys. We hypothesized that the exceptional monkey behavior may have been due to the more extensive practice the monkeys received in comparison with human subjects. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that extensive practice can abolish switch costs in humans. Four human subjects each performed 23,000 trials in a task-switching paradigm. We found that this amount of practice does not abolish switch costs.
众多关于人类任务切换的研究表明,任务切换后的决策比任务重复后的决策更慢且准确性更低。斯托特和斯奈德在任务切换范式下对人类和恒河猴进行了测试,但令人惊讶的是,他们发现猴子没有切换成本。我们推测,猴子的这种特殊行为可能是因为与人类受试者相比,它们接受了更广泛的训练。在本研究中,我们测试了“广泛训练可以消除人类的切换成本”这一假设。四名人类受试者在任务切换范式下各自进行了23000次试验。我们发现,这种训练量并不能消除切换成本。