Kattner Evan A, Stanford Terrence R, Salinas Emilio
Department of Translational Neuroscience, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, 1 Medical Center Blvd., Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1010, USA.
bioRxiv. 2025 Jan 26:2025.01.25.634882. doi: 10.1101/2025.01.25.634882.
Visuospatial attention is key for parsing visual information and selecting targets to look at. In turn, three types of mechanism determine when and where attention is deployed: stimulus-driven (exogenous), goal-driven (endogenous), and history-driven (reflecting recent experience). It is unclear, however, how these distinct attentional signals interact and contribute during natural visual scanning, when stimuli may change rapidly and no fixation requirements are imposed. Here, we investigate this via a gamified task in which participants make continuous saccadic choices at a rapid pace - and yet, perceptual performance can be accurately tracked over time as the choice process unfolds. The results reveal unequivocal markers of exogenous capture toward salient stimuli; endogenous guidance toward valuable targets and relevant locations; and history-driven effects, which produce large, involuntary modulations in processing capacity. Under dynamic conditions, success probability is dictated by temporally precise interplay between different forms of spatial attention, with recent history making a particularly prominent contribution.
Visuospatial attention comprises a collection of mental mechanisms that allow us to focus on (or look at) specific objects or parts of space and ignore others. The next target to be inspected is generally selected based on how much it stands out (salience), its relevance to current goals, and recent experience. We designed a gamified visual scanning task in which all such forms of attentional control interact rapidly, more akin to real life situations (e.g., driving through traffic). Each mechanism affected in characteristic ways the probability that participants would look to the correct target at each moment in time. Most notably, we found that the history of recently seen stimuli determines visual processing capacity much more strongly than previously thought.
视觉空间注意力是解析视觉信息和选择注视目标的关键。相应地,有三种机制决定注意力何时以及在何处被分配:刺激驱动(外源性)、目标驱动(内源性)和历史驱动(反映近期经验)。然而,尚不清楚在自然视觉扫描过程中,当刺激可能迅速变化且没有固定要求时,这些不同的注意力信号是如何相互作用并发挥作用的。在这里,我们通过一个游戏化任务对此进行研究,在该任务中,参与者快速做出连续的扫视选择——而且,随着选择过程的展开,可以随着时间的推移准确跟踪感知性能。结果揭示了对外显刺激的外源性捕获、对有价值目标和相关位置的内源性引导以及历史驱动效应的明确标记,这些效应会在处理能力上产生大规模的、非自愿的调制。在动态条件下,成功概率取决于不同形式的空间注意力之间在时间上精确的相互作用,近期历史的贡献尤为突出。
视觉空间注意力由一系列心理机制组成,使我们能够专注于(或注视)特定的物体或空间部分,而忽略其他部分。通常根据其突出程度(显著性)、与当前目标的相关性以及近期经验来选择下一个要检查的目标。我们设计了一个游戏化的视觉扫描任务,在这个任务中,所有这些形式的注意力控制快速相互作用,更类似于现实生活中的情况(例如,驾车穿过交通)。每种机制都以独特的方式影响参与者在每个时刻看向正确目标的概率。最值得注意的是,我们发现近期看到的刺激的历史对视觉处理能力的决定作用比之前认为的要强得多。