Perez Valdivieso Jose Ramon, Bes-Rastrollo Maira, Monedero Pablo, De Irala Jokin, Lavilla Francisco Javier
Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, University Hospital of Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona Navarra, Spain.
Nephrology (Carlton). 2007 Dec;12(6):533-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2007.00880.x.
Karnofsky Performance Scale Index (KPS) is a measure of functional status that allows patients to be classified according to their functional impairment. We aim to assess if the prior KPS may predict the risk of death among patients with acute renal failure (ARF).
A cohort of 668 consecutive patients who had been admitted in an university-affiliated hospital between June 2000 and June 2006, and had been diagnosed with ARF, were studied. Three hundred and eighty-six patients with ARF who matched at least one of the RIFLE (Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss and End stage) criteria on increased serum creatinine were included for subsequent analysis. The group was divided into four categories, according to different Karnofsky scores measured by a nephrologist (>or=80, 70, 60 and <or=50). We used an adjusted logistic regression model to assess the relationship between the Karnofky score and mortality.
A significant risk of in-hospital mortality within 90 days was observed when the other groups were compared with the >or=80 Karnofsky group. Adjusted odds ratios were 8.87 (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.03-25.99), 6.78 (95% CI 2.61-17.58) and 2.83 (95% CI 1.04-7.68), for Karnofsky groups of <or=50, 60 and 70, respectively. An adjusted odds ratio of 1.75 (95% CI 1.37-2.23) was observed for every 10 point decrease in KPS score.
Functional status as indicated by the KPS is an independent predictor of death in this cohort of patients with ARF. Patients who presented lower scores had increased mortality rates.
卡诺夫斯基功能状态量表指数(KPS)是一种功能状态的衡量指标,可据此对患者的功能损害程度进行分类。我们旨在评估既往KPS是否可预测急性肾衰竭(ARF)患者的死亡风险。
对2000年6月至2006年6月间在一所大学附属医院住院且被诊断为ARF的668例连续患者进行研究。纳入至少符合一项血清肌酐升高的RIFLE(风险、损伤、衰竭、丧失和终末期)标准的386例ARF患者进行后续分析。根据肾科医生测量的不同卡诺夫斯基评分(≥80、70、60和≤50)将该组分为四类。我们使用校正逻辑回归模型评估卡诺夫斯基评分与死亡率之间的关系。
与Karnofsky评分≥80的组相比,其他组在90天内观察到显著的院内死亡风险。Karnofsky评分为≤50、60和70的组校正比值比分别为8.87(95%置信区间[CI] 3.03 - 25.99)、6.78(95% CI 2.61 - 17.58)和2.83(95% CI 1.04 - 7.68)。KPS评分每降低10分,校正比值比为1.75(95% CI 1.37 - 2.23)。
KPS所表明的功能状态是该组ARF患者死亡的独立预测因素。评分较低的患者死亡率较高。