Suppr超能文献

食用含有麦芽糖醇和高直链玉米淀粉的低热量松饼后,餐后反应和饱腹感得到改善。

Improved postprandial response and feeling of satiety after consumption of low-calorie muffins with maltitol and high-amylose corn starch.

作者信息

Quílez J, Bulló M, Salas-Salvadó J

机构信息

Department de Tecnologia, Europastry, S.A., Ctra. Sarral a Barberà s/n, 43424-Sarral, Spain.

出版信息

J Food Sci. 2007 Aug;72(6):S407-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2007.00408.x.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the postprandial glucose (GR), insulin (IR), and triglyceride response as well as the satiety response (SR) to low-calorie muffins (LCMs) and to compare them to those of conventional plain muffins (PMs) and bread. The LCMs had a lower fat content, their sugar was replaced by maltitol, and wheat flour was partially replaced by high-amylose corn starch. We used bread as a reference to calculate glycemic (GI), insulinemic (II), and satiety indices (SI). Seven men and 7 women (33 +/- 7.8 y; body mass index = 25.8 +/- 2.9) were studied in a randomized crossover design and were given either bread, an LCM, or a PM during 3 different occasions. Plasma glucose, insulin, and triglyceride concentrations were periodically measured for 2 h after consumption. We used the same design in a separate assay to evaluate SR by means a subjective questionnaire. The results show that LCMs reduced the IR by 30% (P= 0.03) and lipemic response by 50% (P < 0.001) compared to PMs. GR was only found to be significantly different between bread and LCMs (52% lower in LCM; P= 0.03), with PMs in an intermediate position. The SR of LCMs is similar to bread and higher than PMs (191%; P= 0.02). We concluded that LCMs are a product with a very low GI with better postprandial and SRs than PMs. These metabolic properties are useful in normal and overweight persons. However, further research is needed on the effects of this type of products in individuals with impaired glucose tolerance.

摘要

本研究旨在测定低热量松饼(LCM)的餐后血糖(GR)、胰岛素(IR)和甘油三酯反应以及饱腹感反应(SR),并将其与传统原味松饼(PM)和面包进行比较。LCM的脂肪含量较低,其糖分被麦芽糖醇取代,小麦粉部分被高直链玉米淀粉取代。我们以面包作为参考来计算血糖生成指数(GI)、胰岛素生成指数(II)和饱腹感指数(SI)。7名男性和7名女性(33±7.8岁;体重指数=25.8±2.9)参与了随机交叉设计研究,在3种不同情况下分别给予面包、LCM或PM。进食后2小时定期测量血浆葡萄糖、胰岛素和甘油三酯浓度。我们在另一项试验中采用相同设计,通过主观问卷评估SR。结果显示,与PM相比,LCM使IR降低了30%(P=0.03),脂血反应降低了50%(P<0.001)。仅发现面包和LCM之间的GR有显著差异(LCM中GR低52%;P=0.03),PM处于中间位置。LCM的SR与面包相似,高于PM(高191%;P=0.02)。我们得出结论,LCM是一种GI非常低的产品,其餐后反应和SR优于PM。这些代谢特性对正常人和超重者都有用。然而,对于这类产品对糖耐量受损个体的影响,还需要进一步研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验