Meyer Christian, Ulbricht Sabina, Baumeister Sebastian E, Schumann Anja, Rüge Jeannette, Bischof Gallus, Rumpf Hans-Jürgen, John Ulrich
Department of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Addiction. 2008 Feb;103(2):294-304. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.02031.x. Epub 2007 Nov 8.
To test the efficacy of (i) computer-generated tailored letters and (ii) practitioner-delivered brief advice for smoking cessation against an assessment-only condition; and to compare both interventions directly.
Quasi-randomized controlled trial.
A total of 34 randomly selected general practices from a German region (participation rate 87%).
A total of 1499 consecutive patients aged 18-70 years with daily cigarette smoking (participation rate 80%).
The tailored letters intervention group received up to three individualized personal letters. Brief advice was delivered during routine consultation by the practitioner after an onsite training session. Both interventions were based on the Transtheoretical Model of behaviour change.
Self-reported point prevalence and prolonged abstinence at 6-, 12-, 18- and 24-month follow-ups.
Among participants completing the last follow-up, 6-month prolonged abstinence was 18.3% in the tailored letters intervention group, 14.8% in the brief advice intervention group and 10.5% in the assessment-only control group. Assuming those lost to follow-up to be smokers, the rates were 10.2%, 9.7% and 6.7%, respectively. Analyses including all follow-ups confirmed statistically significant effects of both interventions compared to assessment only. Using complete case analysis, the tailored letters intervention was significantly more effective than brief advice for 24-hour [odds ratio (OR) = 1.4; P = 0.047] but not for 7-day point prevalence abstinence (OR = 1.4; P = 0.068) for prolonged abstinence, or for alternative assumptions about participants lost to follow-up.
The study demonstrated long-term efficacy of low-cost interventions for smoking cessation in general practice. The interventions are suitable to reach entire populations of general practices and smoking patients. Computer-generated letters are a promising option to overcome barriers to provide smoking cessation counselling routinely.
针对仅进行评估的情况,测试(i)计算机生成的个性化信件和(ii)医生提供的简短戒烟建议的效果;并直接比较这两种干预措施。
半随机对照试验。
从德国一个地区随机选取34家普通诊所(参与率87%)。
共1499名年龄在18至70岁之间、每天吸烟的连续患者(参与率80%)。
个性化信件干预组最多收到三封个性化的私人信件。医生在现场培训后,在常规咨询期间提供简短建议。两种干预措施均基于行为改变的跨理论模型。
在6个月、12个月、18个月和24个月随访时自我报告的时点患病率和长期戒烟率。
在完成最后一次随访的参与者中,个性化信件干预组6个月长期戒烟率为18.3%,简短建议干预组为14.8%,仅评估对照组为10.5%。假设失访者为吸烟者,相应比例分别为10.2%、9.7%和6.7%。包括所有随访的分析证实,与仅评估相比,两种干预措施均有统计学显著效果。采用完整病例分析,对于长期戒烟,个性化信件干预在24小时时点患病率戒烟方面显著优于简短建议(优势比[OR]=1.4;P=0.047),但在7天时点患病率戒烟方面并非如此(OR=1.4;P=0.068),对于失访参与者的其他假设情况也是如此。
该研究证明了普通诊所中低成本戒烟干预措施的长期效果。这些干预措施适用于普通诊所的全体人群和吸烟患者。计算机生成的信件是克服常规提供戒烟咨询障碍的一个有前景的选择。