Lennox A S, Osman L M, Reiter E, Robertson R, Friend J, McCann I, Skatun D, Donnan P T
Department of General Practice and Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2AY.
BMJ. 2001 Jun 9;322(7299):1396. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7299.1396.
To develop and evaluate, in a primary care setting, a computerised system for generating tailored letters about smoking cessation.
Randomised controlled trial.
Six general practices in Aberdeen, Scotland.
2553 smokers aged 17 to 65.
All participants received a questionnaire asking about their smoking. Participants subsequently received either a computer tailored or a non-tailored, standard letter on smoking cessation, or no letter.
Prevalence of validated abstinence at six months; change in intention to stop smoking in the next six months.
The validated cessation rate at six months was 3.5% (30/857) (95% confidence interval 2.3% to 4.7%) for the tailored letter group, 4.4% (37/846) (3.0% to 5.8%) for the non-tailored letter group, and 2.6% (22/850) (1.5% to 3.7%) for the control (no letter) group. After adjustment for significant covariates, the cessation rate was 66% greater (-4% to 186%; P=0.07) in the non-tailored letter group than that in the no letter group. Among participants who smoked <20 cigarettes per day, the cessation rate in the non-tailored letter group was 87% greater (0% to 246%; P=0.05) than that in the no letter group. Among heavy smokers who did not quit, a 76% higher rate of positive shift in "stage of change" (intention to quit within a particular period of time) was seen compared with those who received no letter (11% to 180%; P=0.02). The increase in cost for each additional quitter in the non-tailored letter group compared with the no letter group was pound 89.
In a large general practice, a brief non-tailored letter effectively increased cessation rates among smokers. A tailored letter was not effective in increasing cessation rates but promoted shift in movement towards cessation ("stage of change") in heavy smokers. As a pragmatic tool to encourage cessation of smoking, a mass mailing of non-tailored letters from general practices is more cost effective than computer tailored letters or no letters.
在基层医疗环境中开发并评估一个用于生成戒烟个性化信件的计算机系统。
随机对照试验。
苏格兰阿伯丁的6家普通诊所。
2553名年龄在17至65岁之间的吸烟者。
所有参与者都收到一份关于其吸烟情况的问卷。随后,参与者要么收到一封计算机生成的个性化戒烟信件,要么收到一封非个性化的标准戒烟信件,要么没有收到信件。
6个月时经证实的戒烟率;未来6个月内戒烟意愿的变化。
个性化信件组6个月时经证实的戒烟率为3.5%(30/857)(95%置信区间2.3%至4.7%),非个性化信件组为4.4%(37/846)(3.0%至5.8%),对照组(无信件组)为2.6%(22/850)(1.5%至3.7%)。在对显著协变量进行调整后,非个性化信件组的戒烟率比无信件组高66%(-4%至186%;P = 0.07)。在每天吸烟少于20支的参与者中,非个性化信件组的戒烟率比无信件组高87%(0%至246%;P = 0.05)。在未戒烟的重度吸烟者中,与未收到信件的人相比,“行为改变阶段”(在特定时间段内戒烟的意愿)出现正向转变的比例高76%(11%至180%;P = 0.02)。与无信件组相比,非个性化信件组每多一名戒烟者的成本增加89英镑。
在大型普通诊所中,一封简短的非个性化信件能有效提高吸烟者的戒烟率。个性化信件在提高戒烟率方面无效,但能促使重度吸烟者向戒烟方向转变(“行为改变阶段”)。作为鼓励戒烟的实用工具,普通诊所批量邮寄非个性化信件比计算机生成的个性化信件或不邮寄信件更具成本效益。