Lucas Steven M, Stern Joshua M, Adibi Mehrad, Zeltser Ilia S, Cadeddu Jeffrey A, Raj Ganesh V
Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390-9110, USA.
J Urol. 2008 Jan;179(1):75-9; discussion 79-80. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.156. Epub 2007 Nov 13.
We examined the effect of radical nephrectomy, partial nephrectomy and radio frequency ablation on renal function in patients with stage T1a renal masses.
A total of 242 consecutive patients from July 1995 to March 2005 undergoing primary treatment for unilateral renal masses smaller than 4 cm and a normal contralateral kidney were identified. Renal function was calculated using the modified Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation. The rate of decrease in the glomerular filtration rate below 60 ml per minute 1.73 m2 was compared among the 3 treatment modalities.
A total of 86, 85 and 71 patients were treated with radio frequency ablation, partial nephrectomy and radical nephrectomy, respectively. Preoperatively stage 3 chronic kidney disease (glomerular filtration rate less than 60 ml per minute per 1.73 m2) was identified in 65 patients (26.7%), including 26.7%, 27.1% and 26.8% who underwent radio frequency ablation, partial nephrectomy and radical nephrectomy, respectively. Following intervention the 3-year freedom from a glomerular filtration rate decrease of below 60 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 for radio frequency ablation, partial nephrectomy and radical nephrectomy was 95.2%, 70.7% and 39.9%, respectively (p <0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that radical nephrectomy was an independent risk factor vs radio frequency ablation and partial nephrectomy for stage 3 chronic kidney disease (HR 34.3, 95% CI 4.28-275 and 10.9, 95% CI 1.36-88.7, respectively).
Decreased renal function is prevalent in patients with small unilateral renal tumors even with a normal contralateral kidney. Ablative or extirpative nephron sparing techniques are effective for preserving renal function in these patients.
我们研究了根治性肾切除术、部分肾切除术和射频消融术对T1a期肾肿块患者肾功能的影响。
确定了1995年7月至2005年3月期间连续接受治疗的242例单侧肾肿块小于4 cm且对侧肾脏正常的患者。使用改良的肾脏疾病饮食改良方程计算肾功能。比较了三种治疗方式中肾小球滤过率降至每分钟60 ml以下每1.73 m²的下降率。
分别有86、85和71例患者接受了射频消融术、部分肾切除术和根治性肾切除术。术前65例患者(26.7%)被诊断为3期慢性肾脏病(肾小球滤过率低于每分钟60 ml每1.73 m²),其中分别有26.7%、27.1%和26.8%的患者接受了射频消融术、部分肾切除术和根治性肾切除术。干预后,射频消融术、部分肾切除术和根治性肾切除术的3年肾小球滤过率不降至每分钟60 ml以下每1.73 m²的自由度分别为95.2%、70.7%和39.9%(p<0.001)。多因素分析表明,与射频消融术和部分肾切除术相比,根治性肾切除术是3期慢性肾脏病的独立危险因素(HR分别为34.3,95%CI 4.28 - 275和10.9,95%CI 1.36 - 88.7)。
即使对侧肾脏正常,单侧小肾肿瘤患者中肾功能下降也很普遍。消融或切除性保留肾单位技术对这些患者保留肾功能有效。