Mandelli M L, De Simone T, Minati L, Bruzzone M G, Mariotti C, Fancellu R, Savoiardo M, Grisoli M
Neuroradiology Department, Istituto Nazionale Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007 Nov-Dec;28(10):1996-2000. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A0716.
Structural MR imaging does not enable reliable differentiation of spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) types 1 and 2 (SCA1 and SCA2), and imaging may be normal during the first years after the onset of symptoms. We aimed at determining whether measurements of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and fractional anisotropy (FA) may enable their differentiation.
We enrolled 14 patients with SCA1, 11 with SCA2, and 9 age-matched controls. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) was performed on a 1.5T scanner, with b = 1000s/mm2 and 12 directions. ADC and FA were measured by means of regions of interest, positioned in the corticospinal tract at the level of the cerebral peduncle and at the level of the pons, in the transverse pontine fibers, in the superior and middle cerebellar peduncle, and in the hemispheric cerebellar white matter.
With respect to controls, the ADC was significantly elevated in the middle cerebellar peduncle and in hemispheric white matter in SCA1, and in all regions under consideration in SCA2. It was significantly higher in SCA2 than in SCA1 in all regions under consideration. With respect to controls, the FA was significantly reduced in all regions under consideration in SCA1 and in SCA2. It was significantly lower in SCA2 than in SCA1 in the transverse pontine fibers and in the corticospinal tract at the level of the cerebral peduncle. Correlations with clinical scores were found.
DTI did not enable differentiation between SCA1 and SCA2. However, strongly significant differences between the 2 subtypes and with respect to controls and correlations with clinical scores were found.
结构磁共振成像无法可靠地区分1型和2型脊髓小脑共济失调(SCA1和SCA2),且在症状出现后的最初几年成像可能正常。我们旨在确定表观扩散系数(ADC)和分数各向异性(FA)的测量是否有助于区分这两种疾病。
我们纳入了14例SCA1患者、11例SCA2患者以及9例年龄匹配的对照组。在1.5T扫描仪上进行扩散张量成像(DTI),b值 = 1000s/mm2,12个方向。通过感兴趣区域测量ADC和FA,感兴趣区域位于大脑脚水平和脑桥水平的皮质脊髓束、脑桥横纤维、小脑上脚和中脚以及小脑半球白质。
与对照组相比,SCA1患者的小脑中间脚和半球白质的ADC显著升高,SCA2患者所有研究区域的ADC均显著升高。在所有研究区域中,SCA2患者的ADC显著高于SCA1患者。与对照组相比,SCA1和SCA2患者所有研究区域的FA均显著降低。在脑桥横纤维和大脑脚水平的皮质脊髓束中,SCA2患者的FA显著低于SCA1患者。发现与临床评分存在相关性。
DTI无法区分SCA1和SCA2。然而,发现这两种亚型之间以及与对照组之间存在显著差异,且与临床评分存在相关性。