Amaral Flávia L B, Colucci Vivian, Palma-Dibb Regina G, Corona Silmara A M
University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, Department of Operative Dentistry, São Paulo, Brazil.
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2007;19(6):340-53; discussion 354. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2007.00134.x.
One factor that has a great influence on clinical performance of dental restorations is their resistance to degradation. Morphological changes in the structure of tooth-restoration interface aged in the oral environment have been reported. However, even though the in vivo performance is the ultimate testing environment for predicting the behavior of restorations because of the complexity of intraoral conditions, in vitro models such as thermocycling, mechanical loading, pH cycling, and aging of materials in distilled water, NaOCl, and food-simulating solutions may provide important information about the fundamental mechanisms involved in resin-tooth interface degradation. Most recently, the effect of host-derived enzymes and the storage in deproteinizing solutions (such as aqueous NaOCl) on the degradation of resin-dentin bonds has also been described. This review considers the importance of these in vitro methods on bond durability interface in an attempt to understand the behavior of restoratives over time. The first section is focused on the mechanism of in vivo biodegradation, whereas the second looks at studies that have described the influence of water storage, NaOCl storage, host-derived matrix metalloproteinases, thermocycling, mechanical loading, pH cycling, and food-simulating solutions on the degradation of the adhesive interface. It is obvious that these methodologies do not occur separately in the oral cavity, but that each one has a specific importance in the mechanisms of bond degradation.
The in vitro methods used to simulate bond degradation may describe important points related to the clinical performance of restorations. This article evaluates the mechanism of the in vivo biodegradation of adhesive interfaces as well as the influences that various testing methods have on these bonds.
对牙科修复体临床性能有重大影响的一个因素是其抗降解能力。已有报道称,在口腔环境中老化的牙齿修复体界面结构会发生形态变化。然而,尽管由于口腔内环境的复杂性,体内性能是预测修复体行为的最终测试环境,但体外模型,如热循环、机械加载、pH循环以及材料在蒸馏水、次氯酸钠和食品模拟溶液中的老化,可能会提供有关树脂-牙齿界面降解所涉及基本机制的重要信息。最近,也有人描述了宿主衍生酶以及在脱蛋白溶液(如次氯酸钠水溶液)中储存对树脂-牙本质粘结降解的影响。本综述考虑了这些体外方法对粘结耐久性界面的重要性,试图了解修复材料随时间的行为。第一部分重点关注体内生物降解的机制,而第二部分则着眼于描述水储存、次氯酸钠储存、宿主衍生的基质金属蛋白酶、热循环、机械加载、pH循环和食品模拟溶液对粘结界面降解影响的研究。很明显,这些方法在口腔中并非单独发生,而是每种方法在粘结降解机制中都具有特定的重要性。
用于模拟粘结降解的体外方法可能描述了与修复体临床性能相关的要点。本文评估了粘结界面体内生物降解的机制以及各种测试方法对这些粘结的影响。