Hennessy Sean, Leonard Charles E, Palumbo Cristin M, Newcomb Craig, Bilker Warren B
Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6021, USA.
Med Care. 2007 Dec;45(12):1216-20. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318148435a.
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) now make data from the Medicaid and Medicare programs available for research. Prior research has identified important issues in Medicaid data obtained from a commercial vendor.
To perform exploratory analyses of Medicaid and Medicare data obtained through CMS.
We obtained data from 1999 to 2000 for 5 large Medicaid programs (California, Florida, New York, Ohio, and Pennsylvania), together with the corresponding Medicare data for dual eligibles. We first plotted the number of prescription claims per month. We next plotted the frequency of hospitalization by age group, first using Medicaid data alone, then supplemented with Medicare data. We next plotted the frequency of claims with a diagnosis of complications of pregnancy and childbirth, and of prostate cancers, stratified by sex.
The number of prescription claims per month was very stable. Because of cocoverage by Medicare, Medicaid data seemed to miss a substantial number of hospitalizations in those age 45 years and older. Diagnoses of complications of pregnancy and childbirth were uncommon in men and in women older than 60 years, and prostate cancer diagnoses were uncommon in women.
In contrast to Medicaid data previously obtained from a commercial vendor, we found no evidence that prescription Medicaid data from CMS were incomplete. We were also reassured by the infrequency of gross diagnostic miscoding. Researchers using Medicaid data to study hospital outcomes should obtain supplemental Medicare data on dual eligibles for studies of persons aged 45 years and older.
医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)现提供医疗保险和医疗补助计划的数据用于研究。先前的研究已确定从商业供应商获取的医疗补助数据存在重要问题。
对通过CMS获取的医疗保险和医疗补助数据进行探索性分析。
我们获取了1999年至2000年5个大型医疗补助计划(加利福尼亚州、佛罗里达州、纽约州、俄亥俄州和宾夕法尼亚州)的数据,以及符合双重资格者的相应医疗保险数据。我们首先绘制了每月的处方索赔数量。接下来,我们按年龄组绘制了住院频率,首先仅使用医疗补助数据,然后补充医疗保险数据。然后,我们按性别分层绘制了诊断为妊娠和分娩并发症以及前列腺癌的索赔频率。
每月的处方索赔数量非常稳定。由于医疗保险的共同覆盖,医疗补助数据似乎遗漏了大量45岁及以上人群的住院情况。妊娠和分娩并发症的诊断在60岁以上的男性和女性中并不常见,前列腺癌诊断在女性中也不常见。
与先前从商业供应商获取的医疗补助数据不同,我们没有发现证据表明CMS的医疗补助处方数据不完整。总体诊断错误编码的频率较低也让我们放心。使用医疗补助数据研究医院结局的研究人员在研究45岁及以上人群时应获取符合双重资格者的补充医疗保险数据。