• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

注视和箭头指向干扰线索对自主眼球运动的影响。

The influence of eye-gaze and arrow pointing distractor cues on voluntary eye movements.

作者信息

Kuhn Gustav, Benson Valerie

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Durham, Durham, England.

出版信息

Percept Psychophys. 2007 Aug;69(6):966-71. doi: 10.3758/bf03193934.

DOI:10.3758/bf03193934
PMID:18018978
Abstract

We investigated Ricciardelli et al.'s (2002) claim, that the tendency for gaze direction to elicit automatic attentional following is unique to biologically significant information. Participants made voluntary saccades to targets on the left or the right of a display, which were either congruent or incongruent with a centrally presented distractor (eye-gaze or arrow). Contrary to Ricciardelli et al., for both distractor types, saccade latencies were slower, and participants made more directional errors, on incongruent than on congruent trials. Moreover, a cost-benefit analysis showed no difference between the two distractor types. However, latencies for erroneous saccades were faster than correctly directed saccades for the eye-gaze distractors, but not for the arrow distractors.

摘要

我们对里恰尔代利等人(2002年)的观点进行了研究,即注视方向引发自动注意力跟随的倾向是生物重要信息所特有的。参与者对显示屏左侧或右侧的目标进行自主扫视,这些目标与中央呈现的干扰物(目光注视或箭头)一致或不一致。与里恰尔代利等人的观点相反,对于两种干扰物类型,在不一致试验中,扫视潜伏期都较慢,并且参与者出现的方向错误更多。此外,成本效益分析表明两种干扰物类型之间没有差异。然而,对于目光注视干扰物,错误扫视的潜伏期比对正确方向扫视的潜伏期要快,但对于箭头干扰物则不然。

相似文献

1
The influence of eye-gaze and arrow pointing distractor cues on voluntary eye movements.注视和箭头指向干扰线索对自主眼球运动的影响。
Percept Psychophys. 2007 Aug;69(6):966-71. doi: 10.3758/bf03193934.
2
Developmental changes in the control of saccadic eye movements in response to directional eye gaze and arrows.响应定向目光注视和箭头时眼跳运动控制的发育变化。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011 Oct;64(10):1919-29. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.592592. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
3
Gaze and arrow distractors influence saccade trajectories similarly.注视和箭头干扰物对扫视轨迹的影响相似。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Nov;63(11):2120-40. doi: 10.1080/17470211003718721. Epub 2010 May 17.
4
Look away! Eyes and arrows engage oculomotor responses automatically.别看!眼睛和箭头会自动引发动眼反应。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 Feb;71(2):314-27. doi: 10.3758/APP.71.2.314.
5
Early saccade planning cannot override oculomotor interference elicited by gaze and arrow distractors.早期眼跳计划不能克服由注视和箭头分心物引起的眼动干扰。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Oct;27(5):990-997. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01768-x.
6
Automatic attention orienting by social and symbolic cues activates different neural networks: an fMRI study.社会和符号线索引发的自动注意力定向激活不同神经网络:一项功能磁共振成像研究
Neuroimage. 2006 Oct 15;33(1):406-13. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.048. Epub 2006 Sep 1.
7
Eye movements affirm: automatic overt gaze and arrow cueing for typical adults and adults with autism spectrum disorder.眼球运动证实:典型成年人和自闭症谱系障碍成年人的自动外显注视和箭头提示。
Exp Brain Res. 2010 Mar;201(2):155-65. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-2019-7. Epub 2009 Oct 2.
8
Can masked gaze and arrow stimuli elicit overt orienting of attention? A registered report.隐蔽注视和箭头刺激能否引发注意力的明显定向?一项预注册报告。
Conscious Cogn. 2023 Mar;109:103476. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2023.103476. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
9
Gaze distractors influence saccadic curvature: evidence for the role of the oculomotor system in gaze-cued orienting.注视干扰物会影响扫视曲率:动眼系统在注视提示定向中作用的证据。
Vision Res. 2006 Oct;46(21):3674-80. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.06.004. Epub 2006 Aug 9.
10
The developmental trajectory of attentional orienting to socio-biological cues.注意力定向于社会生物学线索的发展轨迹。
Exp Brain Res. 2016 Jun;234(6):1351-62. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4627-3. Epub 2016 Apr 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Uncovering everyday attention in the lab: front-viewed heads boost overt social orienting.在实验室中揭示日常注意力:正面朝向的头部促进明显的社会定向。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2025 Aug 1;10(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s41235-025-00661-2.
2
Pre-stimulus activities affect subsequent visual processing: Empirical evidence and potential neural mechanisms.刺激前活动影响后续视觉处理:实证证据与潜在神经机制。
Brain Behav. 2025 Feb;15(2):e3654. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3654.
3
Preserved learning of implicit regularities with predictive social cues in older adults.
老年人通过预测性社会线索对隐性规律的学习保持能力。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Dec 10;15:1470649. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1470649. eCollection 2024.
4
Unconscious and Conscious Gaze-Triggered Attentional Orienting: Distinguishing Innate and Acquired Components of Social Attention in Children and Adults with Autistic Traits and Autism Spectrum Disorders.无意识和有意识的注视引发的注意力定向:区分具有自闭症特质的儿童和成人以及自闭症谱系障碍患者社交注意力的先天和后天成分。
Research (Wash D C). 2024 Jul 10;7:0417. doi: 10.34133/research.0417. eCollection 2024.
5
Exploring the relationship between oculomotor preparation and gaze-cued covert shifts in attention.探索眼动准备与目光引导的注意内隐蔽转移之间的关系。
J Vis. 2023 Mar 1;23(3):18. doi: 10.1167/jov.23.3.18.
6
Exploring the Social Environment with the Eyes: A Review of the Impact of Facial Stimuli on Saccadic Trajectories.用眼探索社会环境:面部刺激对视跳轨迹影响的综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 10;19(24):16615. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416615.
7
Do gaze and non-gaze stimuli trigger different spatial interference effects? It depends on stimulus perceivability.注视和非注视刺激会引发不同的空间干扰效应吗?这取决于刺激的可感知性。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 13;13:801151. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.801151. eCollection 2022.
8
Cross-cultural asymmetries in oculomotor interference elicited by gaze distractors belonging to Asian and White faces.跨文化的眼球运动干扰不对称性,由属于亚洲人和白种人面孔的注视干扰者引起。
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 14;11(1):20410. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99954-x.
9
The effect of directional social cues on saccadic eye movements in Parkinson's disease.定向社会线索对帕金森病患者眼球跳动的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2021 Jul;239(7):2063-2075. doi: 10.1007/s00221-021-06034-7. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
10
Attention Combines Similarly in Covert and Overt Conditions.注意力在隐蔽和公开条件下的组合方式相似。
Vision (Basel). 2019 Apr 25;3(2):16. doi: 10.3390/vision3020016.