• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Vater壶腹癌的临床病理及免疫组化特征:肠型预后较好。

The clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical characteristics of ampulla of Vater carcinoma: the intestinal type is associated with a better prognosis.

作者信息

Roh Young-Hoon, Kim Young-Hoon, Lee Hyoun-Wook, Kim Su-Jin, Roh Mee-Sook, Jeong Jin-Sook, Jung Ghap-Joong

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.

出版信息

Hepatogastroenterology. 2007 Sep;54(78):1641-4.

PMID:18019683
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We wanted to compare the clinicopathological parameters with the immunohistochemical expression patterns and patient survival for the intestinal type (IT) and the pancreatobiliary type (PT) of ampulla of Vater carcinoma. Ampulla of Vater carcinoma can be classified histologically into either IT or PT. The biologic behavior and patient prognosis vary considerably in relation to the tumor type.

METHODOLOGY

From September, 1995, to February, 2004, 34 patients with the pathologic diagnosis of ampulla of Vater carcinoma were retrospectively reviewed and the prognostic factors were analyzed. To classify the phenotypes of the tumors, the keratin types (CK7 and CK20), the type of apomucin of the mucosa (MUC2), and the glucose transporter (GLUT1) were studied for differentiating the tumor types.

RESULTS

The 5-year survival rate of the 34 patients with ampulla of Vater carcinoma was 58.8%. Histologically, 12 patients had IT and 22 had PT, and the IT patients all survived. The long-term survival after resection of the tumor was significantly greater for the patients with IT than for the patients with PT. Although these differences were not statistically significant, the prognosis of IT group seemed more favorable (p = 0.0955). On the immunohistochemical staining, MUC2 (p < 0.0001), CK20 (p = 0.0002) and CK7 (p = 0.0368) were statistically effective, but not GLUT1, for differentiating IT from PT.

CONCLUSIONS

For the classification of the tumor phenotypes, performing immunohistochemical staining were helpful to differentiate the two types of tumor. A study with a larger number samples would probably elucidate the different clinical course between these two types of ampulla of Vater carcinoma.

摘要

背景/目的:我们希望比较壶腹癌肠型(IT)和胰胆管型(PT)的临床病理参数、免疫组化表达模式及患者生存率。壶腹癌在组织学上可分为IT型或PT型。肿瘤类型不同,其生物学行为和患者预后差异很大。

方法

回顾性分析1995年9月至2004年2月间34例经病理诊断为壶腹癌的患者,并分析其预后因素。为区分肿瘤表型,研究了角蛋白类型(CK7和CK20)、黏膜黏蛋白类型(MUC2)和葡萄糖转运蛋白(GLUT1)以鉴别肿瘤类型。

结果

34例壶腹癌患者的5年生存率为58.8%。组织学上,12例为IT型,22例为PT型,IT型患者均存活。IT型患者肿瘤切除后的长期生存率显著高于PT型患者。尽管这些差异无统计学意义,但IT组的预后似乎更好(p = 0.0955)。免疫组化染色显示,MUC2(p < 0.0001)、CK20(p = 0.0002)和CK7(p = 0.0368)在鉴别IT型和PT型方面具有统计学意义,而GLUT1则无统计学意义。

结论

对于肿瘤表型的分类,进行免疫组化染色有助于区分这两种类型的肿瘤。一项样本量更大的研究可能会阐明这两种类型壶腹癌不同的临床病程。

相似文献

1
The clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical characteristics of ampulla of Vater carcinoma: the intestinal type is associated with a better prognosis.Vater壶腹癌的临床病理及免疫组化特征:肠型预后较好。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2007 Sep;54(78):1641-4.
2
Pathogenesis of carcinoma of the papilla of Vater.Vater乳头癌的发病机制。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2004;11(5):301-9. doi: 10.1007/s00534-004-0898-3.
3
Factors influencing recurrence after curative resection for ampulla of Vater carcinoma.影响壶腹癌根治性切除术后复发的因素。
J Surg Oncol. 2007 Mar 15;95(4):286-90. doi: 10.1002/jso.20665.
4
Carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater: morphological and immunophenotypical classification predicts overall survival. Vater 壶腹癌:形态学和免疫表型分类预测总生存期。
Pancreas. 2013 Jan;42(1):60-6. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e318258fda8.
5
Expression of the caudal-type homeodomain transcription factors CDX 1/2 and outcome in carcinomas of the ampulla of Vater.尾型同源域转录因子CDX 1/2的表达与 Vater壶腹癌的预后
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Mar 20;23(9):1811-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.068.
6
Significance analysis of histologic type and perineural invasion as prognostic factors after curative resection of ampulla of Vater carcinoma.壶腹癌根治性切除术后组织学类型和神经周围侵犯作为预后因素的意义分析
Hepatogastroenterology. 2010 May-Jun;57(99-100):646-52.
7
Differential Expression of β-Catenin, EGFR, CK7, CK20, MUC1, MUC2, and CDX2 in Intestinal and Pancreatobiliary-Type Ampullary Carcinomas.β-连环蛋白、表皮生长因子受体、细胞角蛋白7、细胞角蛋白20、黏蛋白1、黏蛋白2和尾型同源盒转录因子2在肠道型和胰胆管型壶腹癌中的差异表达
Int J Surg Pathol. 2017 Feb;25(1):31-40. doi: 10.1177/1066896916664987. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
8
Expression of gastric mucin MUC5AC and gastric transcription factor SOX2 in ampulla of vater adenocarcinoma: comparison between expression patterns and histologic subtypes.胃黏液素MUC5AC和胃转录因子SOX2在壶腹腺癌中的表达:表达模式与组织学亚型的比较
Oncol Rep. 2006 May;15(5):1157-61.
9
Differences in mucus and K-ras mutation in relation to phenotypes of tumors of the papilla of vater.与 Vater 壶腹肿瘤表型相关的黏液和 K-ras 突变差异。
Cancer. 1999 Aug 15;86(4):596-607.
10
[Combined application of immunohistochemical markers to identify pathologic subtypes of ampullary carcinoma and its clinical significance].免疫组化标志物联合应用鉴别壶腹癌病理亚型及其临床意义
Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Feb 8;48(2):92-97. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5807.2019.02.003.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Frontline FOLFIRINOX with Fluorouracil-Based and Gemcitabine-Based Chemotherapies in Metastatic Ampullary Adenocarcinoma: A Multicenter Study by the Turkish Oncology Group (TOG).一线FOLFIRINOX方案与氟尿嘧啶类和吉西他滨类化疗方案治疗转移性壶腹腺癌的比较:土耳其肿瘤学组(TOG)的一项多中心研究
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 20;14(16):5868. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165868.
2
Establishment and characterization of a new intestinal-type ampullary carcinoma cell line, DPC-X3.一种新的肠型壶腹癌细胞系DPC-X3的建立与鉴定
BMC Cancer. 2024 Dec 20;24(1):1558. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-13340-0.
3
Intra-ampullary and Periampullary Carcinoma: Clinicopathological Comparison and Survival Outcomes.
壶腹内癌和壶腹周围癌:临床病理比较及生存结果
Cureus. 2024 Aug 16;16(8):e67030. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67030. eCollection 2024 Aug.
4
Outcomes of Palliative Chemotherapy for Ampulla of Vater Adenocarcinoma: A Multicenter Cohort Study.壶腹腺癌姑息化疗的结果:一项多中心队列研究。
Gut Liver. 2024 Jul 15;18(4):729-736. doi: 10.5009/gnl230164. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
5
Updates on the Management of Ampullary Neoplastic Lesions.壶腹肿瘤性病变的管理进展
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Oct 6;13(19):3138. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13193138.
6
The impact of the histological classification of ampullary carcinomas on long-term outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single tertiary referral center evaluation.壶腹癌的组织学分类对胰十二指肠切除术后长期结局的影响:单中心三级转诊中心评估。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 Nov;407(7):2811-2821. doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02563-z. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
7
Ampullary Carcinoma: An Overview of a Rare Entity and Discussion of Current and Future Therapeutic Challenges.壶腹癌:一种罕见实体的概述及对当前和未来治疗挑战的讨论。
Curr Oncol. 2021 Sep 1;28(5):3393-3402. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28050293.
8
Ampullary carcinoma of the duodenum: current clinical issues and genomic overview.十二指肠壶腹癌:当前的临床问题和基因组概述。
Surg Today. 2022 Feb;52(2):189-197. doi: 10.1007/s00595-021-02270-0. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
9
Tissue microarray-chip featuring computerized immunophenotypical characterization more accurately subtypes ampullary adenocarcinoma than routine histology.组织微阵列芯片的计算机免疫表型特征分析比常规组织学更能准确地下咽腺癌亚型分类。
World J Gastroenterol. 2020 Nov 21;26(43):6822-6836. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i43.6822.
10
Prognostic Factors of Long-term Survival Following Radical Resection for Ampullary Carcinoma.根治性切除术后壶腹癌长期生存的预后因素。
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2021 Sep;52(3):872-881. doi: 10.1007/s12029-020-00479-9.