Elsayed Dya Eldin M, Kass Nancy E
Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Alzaiem Alazhari University, Republic of the Sudan.
Dev World Bioeth. 2007 Dec;7(3):143-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2006.00163.x.
The ethical review process is an important component of contemporary health research worldwide. Sudan started an ethical review process rather late in comparison with other countries. In this study, we evaluate the structure and functions of existing ethics review committees. We also explore the knowledge and attitudes of Sudanese researchers toward the ethical review process and their experience with existing ethics review committees. There are four ethics review committees in the country; these committees have no institutional regulations to govern their functions. Furthermore, Sudan also lacks national guidelines. Ethical reviews are carried out primarily for studies seeking international funding and are almost always governed by the funding agencies' requirements. Nearly half of respondents (46.3%) knew about the existence of research ethics committees in Sudan. Researchers reported a variety of experiences with the ethical review process; most of them were unable to define 'ethics committee'.
伦理审查过程是当代全球健康研究的一个重要组成部分。与其他国家相比,苏丹启动伦理审查过程的时间相当晚。在本研究中,我们评估了现有伦理审查委员会的结构和职能。我们还探讨了苏丹研究人员对伦理审查过程的了解和态度,以及他们在现有伦理审查委员会方面的经历。该国共有四个伦理审查委员会;这些委员会没有管理其职能的机构规定。此外,苏丹也缺乏国家指导方针。伦理审查主要针对寻求国际资金的研究进行,并且几乎总是受资助机构要求的制约。近一半的受访者(46.3%)知道苏丹存在研究伦理委员会。研究人员报告了在伦理审查过程中的各种经历;他们中的大多数人无法定义“伦理委员会”。