Tracy Sally K, Tracy Mark B, Sullivan Elizabeth
Women's Health Nursing and Midwifery, Royal Hospital for Women, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Birth. 2007 Dec;34(4):301-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2007.00188.x.
Neonatal intensive care and special care nurseries provide a level of care that is both high in cost and low in volume. The aim of our study was to determine the rate of admission of term babies to neonatal intensive care in association with each method of giving birth among low-risk women.
We examined the records of 1,001,249 women who gave birth in Australia during 1999 to 2002 using data from the National Perinatal Data Collection. Among low-risk women, we calculated the adjusted odds of admission to neonatal intensive care at term separated for each week of gestational age between 37 and 41 completed weeks. We also calculated the odds of admission to neonatal intensive care in association with cesarean section before or after the onset of labor, and vacuum or instrumental birth compared with unassisted vaginal birth at 40 weeks' gestation.
The overall rate of admission to neonatal intensive care of term babies was 8.9 percent for primiparas and 6.3 percent for multiparas. After a cesarean section before the onset of labor, the adjusted odds of admission among low-risk primiparas at 37 weeks' gestation were 12.08 (99% CI 8.64-16.89); at 38 weeks, 7.49 (99% CI 5.54-10.11); and at 39 weeks, 2.80 (99% CI 2.02-3.88). At 41 weeks, the adjusted odds were not significantly higher than those at 40 weeks' gestation. Among low-risk multiparas who had a cesarean section before the onset of labor, the adjusted odds of admission to neonatal intensive care at 37 weeks' gestation were 15.40 (99% CI 12.87-18.43); at 38 weeks, 12.13 (99% CI 10.37-14.19); and at 39 weeks, 5.09 (99% CI 4.31-6.00). At 41 weeks' gestation, the adjusted odds of admission were significantly lower than those at 40 weeks (AOR 0.64, 99% CI 0.47-0.88). Babies born after any operative method of birth were at increased odds of being admitted to neonatal intensive care compared with those born after unassisted vaginal birth at 40 weeks' gestation.
The adjusted odds of admission to neonatal intensive care for babies of low-risk women were increased after birth at 37 weeks' gestation. In a climate of rising cesarean sections, this information is important to women who may be considering elective procedures.
新生儿重症监护病房和特殊护理病房提供的护理水平成本高昂且数量有限。我们研究的目的是确定低风险女性中,每种分娩方式下足月婴儿进入新生儿重症监护病房的入院率。
我们利用国家围产期数据收集中心的数据,检查了1999年至2002年在澳大利亚分娩的1,001,249名女性的记录。在低风险女性中,我们计算了孕37至41足周之间每个孕周足月时进入新生儿重症监护病房的校正比值比。我们还计算了与临产前或临产后剖宫产以及与孕40周时未辅助阴道分娩相比,真空吸引或器械助产分娩相关的进入新生儿重症监护病房的比值比。
初产妇足月婴儿进入新生儿重症监护病房的总体入院率为8.9%,经产妇为6.3%。临产前剖宫产术后,孕37周时低风险初产妇的校正入院比值比为12.08(99%可信区间8.64 - 16.89);孕38周时为7.49(99%可信区间5.54 - 10.11);孕39周时为2.80(99%可信区间2.02 - 3.88)。在孕41周时,校正比值比并不显著高于孕40周时。在临产前剖宫产的低风险经产妇中,孕37周时进入新生儿重症监护病房的校正比值比为15.40(99%可信区间12.87 - 18.43);孕38周时为12.13(99%可信区间10.37 - 14.19);孕39周时为5.09(99%可信区间4.31 - 6.00)。在孕41周时,校正入院比值比显著低于孕40周(调整后比值比0.64,99%可信区间0.47 - 0.88)。与孕40周时未辅助阴道分娩出生的婴儿相比,任何手术分娩方式出生的婴儿进入新生儿重症监护病房的几率增加。
孕37周出生后,低风险女性婴儿进入新生儿重症监护病房的校正入院几率增加。在剖宫产率不断上升的情况下,这些信息对可能考虑择期手术的女性很重要。