MacDorman Marian F, Declercq Eugene, Menacker Fay, Malloy Michael H
Division of Vital Statistics, National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, Maryland 20782, USA.
Birth. 2008 Mar;35(1):3-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2007.00205.x.
The percentage of United States births delivered by cesarean section continues to increase, even for women considered to be at low risk for the procedure. The purpose of this study was to use an "intention-to-treat" methodology, as recommended by a National Institutes of Health conference, to examine neonatal mortality risk by method of delivery for low-risk women.
Low-risk births were singleton, term (37-41 weeks' gestation), vertex births, with no reported medical risk factors or placenta previa and with no prior cesarean section. All U.S. live births and infant deaths for the 1999 to 2002 birth cohorts (8,026,415 births and 17,412 infant deaths) were examined. Using the intention-to-treat methodology, a "planned vaginal delivery" category was formed by combining vaginal births and cesareans with labor complications or procedures since the original intention in both cases was presumably a vaginal delivery. This group was compared with cesareans with no labor complications or procedures, which is the closest approximation to a "planned cesarean delivery" category possible, given data limitations. Multivariable logistic regression was used to model neonatal mortality as a function of delivery method, adjusting for sociodemographic and medical risk factors.
The unadjusted neonatal mortality rate for cesarean deliveries with no labor complications or procedures was 2.4 times that for planned vaginal deliveries. In the most conservative model, the adjusted odds ratio for neonatal mortality was 1.69 (95% CI 1.35-2.11) for cesareans with no labor complications or procedures, compared with planned vaginal deliveries.
The finding that cesarean deliveries with no labor complications or procedures remained at a 69 percent higher risk of neonatal mortality than planned vaginal deliveries is important, given the rapid increase in the number of primary cesarean deliveries without a reported medical indication.
在美国,剖宫产分娩的比例持续上升,即使是那些被认为进行该手术风险较低的女性也是如此。本研究的目的是采用美国国立卫生研究院会议所推荐的“意向性治疗”方法,来研究低风险女性的分娩方式与新生儿死亡风险之间的关系。
低风险分娩为单胎、足月(妊娠37 - 41周)、头位分娩,无报告的医学风险因素或前置胎盘,且既往无剖宫产史。对1999年至2002年出生队列中的所有美国活产和婴儿死亡情况(8,026,415例出生和17,412例婴儿死亡)进行了检查。采用意向性治疗方法,将阴道分娩以及因分娩并发症或手术而进行剖宫产的情况合并为“计划阴道分娩”类别,因为这两种情况最初的分娩意向大概都是阴道分娩。鉴于数据限制,将该组与无分娩并发症或手术的剖宫产进行比较,后者是最接近“计划剖宫产分娩”类别的情况。使用多变量逻辑回归模型将新生儿死亡率作为分娩方式的函数进行建模,并对社会人口统计学和医学风险因素进行调整。
无分娩并发症或手术的剖宫产分娩的未调整新生儿死亡率是计划阴道分娩的2.4倍。在最保守的模型中,与计划阴道分娩相比,无分娩并发症或手术的剖宫产分娩的新生儿死亡调整比值比为1.69(95%可信区间1.35 - 2.11)。
鉴于无医学指征的首次剖宫产数量迅速增加,无分娩并发症或手术的剖宫产分娩的新生儿死亡风险仍比计划阴道分娩高69%这一发现具有重要意义。