• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荷兰劳动者的久坐行为:不同职业和商业部门之间的差异。

Sedentary behavior in Dutch workers: differences between occupations and business sectors.

作者信息

Jans Marielle P, Proper Karin I, Hildebrandt Vincent H

机构信息

TNO Quality of Life, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Am J Prev Med. 2007 Dec;33(6):450-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.07.033.

DOI:10.1016/j.amepre.2007.07.033
PMID:18022060
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sedentary behavior is an independent risk factor for excess body weight and other health problems. There are no published data on sitting time at work, or how this is related to occupation and sector (branch of business). No published study has shown whether extended sitting at work is compensated for by sitting less during leisure time.

METHODS

This study used data from a continuous cross-sectional survey, from 2000 to 2005 (N=7720). Workers were asked how many minutes they spent sitting during the preceding day, both at work and in their leisure time. To test differences in sitting times among occupational groups and sectors, descriptive analyses and analyses of variance were carried out in 2006.

RESULTS

On average, the Dutch working population reported sitting for 7 hours each day, one third of which was at work. Occupational groups and sectors differed significantly in sedentary behavior, mainly involving sitting periods at work. Workers spending long periods sitting at work did not compensate by sitting less during their leisure time.

CONCLUSIONS

Workers spend a substantial part of their waking and working time seated. Those who sat for long periods at work did not compensate for this lack of activity by adopting less-sedentary behaviors during leisure time. To prevent health problems, the best approach may be to reduce sedentary behavior at work, when traveling to and from work, and during leisure time.

摘要

背景

久坐行为是超重及其他健康问题的独立风险因素。目前尚无关于工作时坐姿时长的数据,也不清楚其与职业及行业(业务分支)之间的关系。尚无已发表的研究表明工作时的长时间坐姿是否能通过休闲时间减少坐姿来得到补偿。

方法

本研究使用了2000年至2005年连续横断面调查的数据(N = 7720)。研究人员询问了工作人员前一天在工作和休闲时间坐着的时长。为检验职业群体和行业之间坐姿时长的差异,2006年进行了描述性分析和方差分析。

结果

荷兰工作人群平均每天坐着的时长为7小时,其中三分之一是在工作时。职业群体和行业在久坐行为方面存在显著差异,主要体现在工作时的坐姿时长上。工作时长时间坐着的工作人员在休闲时间并没有通过减少坐姿来进行补偿。

结论

工作人员在清醒和工作时间的很大一部分是坐着度过的。那些在工作时长时间坐着的人并没有通过在休闲时间采取较少久坐行为来弥补这种活动不足。为预防健康问题,最佳方法可能是减少工作时、上下班途中以及休闲时间的久坐行为。

相似文献

1
Sedentary behavior in Dutch workers: differences between occupations and business sectors.荷兰劳动者的久坐行为:不同职业和商业部门之间的差异。
Am J Prev Med. 2007 Dec;33(6):450-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.07.033.
2
Cross-sectional associations between occupational and leisure-time sitting, physical activity and obesity in working adults.工作成年人中职业和闲暇时间久坐、身体活动与肥胖的横断面关联。
Prev Med. 2012 Mar-Apr;54(3-4):195-200. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.12.020. Epub 2011 Dec 28.
3
Occupation, hours worked, and leisure-time physical activity.职业、工作时长和休闲时间的体育活动。
Prev Med. 2000 Dec;31(6):673-81. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2000.0763.
4
Physical activity among Dutch workers--differences between occupations.荷兰劳动者的身体活动——职业间差异
Prev Med. 2006 Jul;43(1):42-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.03.017. Epub 2006 May 8.
5
Why Women Sit: Determinants of Leisure Sitting Time for Working Women.女性为何久坐:职业女性休闲久坐时间的决定因素
Womens Health Issues. 2015 Nov-Dec;25(6):673-9. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2015.06.012. Epub 2015 Aug 22.
6
Sitting time and step counts in office workers.上班族的久坐时间和步数
Occup Med (Lond). 2014 Apr;64(3):188-92. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqt164. Epub 2014 Jan 29.
7
Leisure-time physical activity and occupational sitting: Associations with steps/day and BMI in 54-59 year old Australian women.休闲时间的体育活动与职业久坐:54 - 59岁澳大利亚女性每日步数及体重指数的关联
Prev Med. 2009 Jan;48(1):64-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.10.016. Epub 2008 Oct 30.
8
Modifiable characteristics associated with sedentary behaviours among youth.与青少年久坐行为相关的可改变特征。
Int J Pediatr Obes. 2008;3(2):93-101. doi: 10.1080/17477160701830879.
9
Understanding occupational sitting: prevalence, correlates and moderating effects in Australian employees.了解澳大利亚员工的职业坐姿:患病率、相关因素及调节作用
Prev Med. 2014 Oct;67:288-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.07.031. Epub 2014 Aug 10.
10
Descriptive study of sedentary behaviours in 35,444 French working adults: cross-sectional findings from the ACTI-Cités study.对35444名法国在职成年人久坐行为的描述性研究:来自ACTI-Cités研究的横断面结果。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Apr 14;15:379. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1711-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of occupational sedentary behavior on mental health: A systematic review and meta-analysis.职业久坐行为对心理健康的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 20;20(8):e0328678. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328678. eCollection 2025.
2
Defaults at Work: A Field Experiment on the Effect of Nudges on Stand-Up Working.工作中的默认选项:关于助推对站立式工作影响的实地实验
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jun 24;22(7):994. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22070994.
3
Effectiveness of short active breaks for reducing sedentary behavior and increasing physical activity among Japanese office workers: one-year quasi-experimental study.
短期主动休息对减少日本上班族久坐行为和增加身体活动的有效性:一年期准实验研究。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2025 Jul 1;51(4):312-322. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4224. Epub 2025 Apr 8.
4
Prune extract prevents disuse osteoporosis by inhibiting the decrease in osteoblast-related gene expression in sciatic-denervated rats.西梅提取物通过抑制坐骨神经去神经支配大鼠成骨细胞相关基因表达的降低来预防废用性骨质疏松症。
J Clin Biochem Nutr. 2025 Jan;76(1):42-49. doi: 10.3164/jcbn.24-139. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
5
A systematic review of research on sitting and working furniture ergonomic from 2012 to 2022: Analysis of assessment approaches.2012年至2022年坐姿与工作家具人体工程学研究的系统综述:评估方法分析
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 26;10(7):e28384. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28384. eCollection 2024 Apr 15.
6
Factors Associated with Sedentary Behavior and Physical Activity Among People Living in Saudi Arabia - A Cross-Sectional Study.沙特阿拉伯居民久坐行为和身体活动的相关因素——一项横断面研究
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2023 Sep 27;16:1985-1997. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S427792. eCollection 2023.
7
The Effect of Sitting Duration on Peripheral Blood Pressure Responses to Prolonged Sitting, With and Without Interruption: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.久坐时长对长时间持续久坐(有无间断)时外周血压反应的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Sports Med. 2024 Jan;54(1):169-183. doi: 10.1007/s40279-023-01915-z. Epub 2023 Sep 8.
8
Diaphragmatic breathing exercises in recovery from fatigue-induced changes in spinal mobility and postural stability: a study protocol.膈肌呼吸练习对疲劳引起的脊柱活动度和姿势稳定性变化恢复的影响:一项研究方案。
Front Physiol. 2023 Jun 29;14:1220464. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1220464. eCollection 2023.
9
Movement Behavior and Health Outcomes among Sedentary Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study.静坐成年人的运动行为与健康结果:一项横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 6;20(5):4668. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054668.
10
Peer champions responses to nudge-based strategies designed to reduce prolonged sitting behaviour: Lessons learnt and implications from lived experiences of non-compliant participants.同伴支持者对旨在减少久坐行为的基于助推策略的反应:从不依从参与者的生活经历中吸取的教训及启示
AIMS Public Health. 2022 Jul 12;9(3):574-588. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2022040. eCollection 2022.