Perakaki K, Mellor A C, Qualtrough A J E
School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
J Hosp Infect. 2007 Dec;67(4):355-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2007.09.009. Epub 2007 Nov 19.
The aim of this study was to compare the amount of residual organic debris on endodontic instruments that had been cleaned in either an ultrasonic bath or a washer disinfector prior to sterilisation. A total of 90 endodontic files of varying sizes were used to clean and shape root canals in extracted teeth and were then placed in endodontic file holders. Test group 1 (36 files) were ultrasonically cleaned for 10 min and test group 2 (36 files) were cleaned in a washer disinfector. A control group (18 files) were not cleaned at all. Following sterilisation, all the files were visually inspected under a light microscope and scored using an established scale. The results showed that both test groups had significantly less residual debris than the control group. Comparing the test groups, the files that had been cleaned ultrasonically had significantly less debris than those cleaned in the washer disinfector. The design of the instrument holder may have been a factor in this result. More research is needed into the use of washer disinfectors in the cleaning of small dental instruments that have a complex surface structure.
本研究的目的是比较在灭菌前分别在超声清洗槽或清洗消毒器中进行清洗的根管治疗器械上残留有机碎屑的量。总共使用90支不同尺寸的根管锉对拔除牙齿的根管进行清理和塑形,然后将其放入根管锉夹中。试验组1(36支锉)进行超声清洗10分钟,试验组2(36支锉)在清洗消毒器中进行清洗。对照组(18支锉)完全不进行清洗。灭菌后,在光学显微镜下对所有锉进行目视检查,并使用既定的评分标准进行评分。结果显示,两个试验组的残留碎屑均明显少于对照组。比较试验组,经超声清洗的锉上的碎屑明显少于在清洗消毒器中清洗的锉。器械夹的设计可能是导致这一结果的一个因素。对于具有复杂表面结构的小型牙科器械在清洗消毒器中的使用,还需要进行更多的研究。