• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急救医疗服务发起的拒绝转运:当前状况

EMS-initiated refusal of transport: the current state of affairs.

作者信息

Knapp Barry J, Kerns Brian L, Riley Ivan, Powers James

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia 23507-1999, USA.

出版信息

J Emerg Med. 2009 Feb;36(2):157-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.06.028. Epub 2007 Nov 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.06.028
PMID:18024070
Abstract

The objectives of this study were 1) to determine the number and characteristics of emergency medical services (EMS) agencies within the 200 largest US cities that sanction EMS-initiated refusal of transport; and 2) to determine the extent of no-cost alternative transport mechanisms among those agencies that allow EMS-initiated refusal of transport. EMS agencies located within the 200 largest US cities were contacted via telephone and surveyed as to whether their agency sanctioned EMS-initiated refusal of transport (EMS-IROT). Agencies with a policy were further questioned regarding its components and usage patterns. The telephone survey contacted 100% (200) of the target population. Currently, 7.0% (14) of EMS agencies have EMS-IROT protocols, with 64% (9) of those requiring direct medical oversight. Five (2.5%) of the 200 agencies sanctioned EMS-IROT without requiring online medical approval. Average annual call volume of the five agencies not requiring direct medical oversight was 70,800; their EMS-IROT protocols have been in existence a mean of 19.8 years. None of these agencies had a no-cost alternative transport mechanism. Three (1.5%) agencies terminated EMS-IROT protocols in the past. EMS-initiated refusal of transport continues to be a rare entity among US EMS agencies. Those that do not require direct medical oversight tend to have well-established programs, though no agency offered a formal no-cost alternative transport mechanism.

摘要

本研究的目的是

1)确定美国最大的200个城市中批准紧急医疗服务(EMS)人员发起拒绝转运的紧急医疗服务机构的数量和特征;2)确定在那些允许EMS人员发起拒绝转运的机构中,免费替代转运机制的普及程度。通过电话联系了位于美国最大的200个城市内的紧急医疗服务机构,并就其机构是否批准EMS人员发起拒绝转运(EMS-IROT)进行了调查。对有相关政策的机构进一步询问了其政策内容和使用模式。电话调查覆盖了100%(200个)的目标人群。目前,7.0%(14个)的紧急医疗服务机构有EMS-IROT协议,其中64%(9个)要求直接医疗监督。200个机构中有5个(2.5%)批准EMS-IROT但不要求在线医疗批准。这5个不要求直接医疗监督的机构的年平均呼叫量为70,800次;它们的EMS-IROT协议平均已存在19.8年。这些机构中没有一个有免费替代转运机制。有3个(1.5%)机构在过去终止了EMS-IROT协议。在美国紧急医疗服务机构中,EMS人员发起拒绝转运仍然是一种罕见的情况。那些不要求直接医疗监督的机构往往有完善的项目,不过没有一个机构提供正式的免费替代转运机制。

相似文献

1
EMS-initiated refusal of transport: the current state of affairs.急救医疗服务发起的拒绝转运:当前状况
J Emerg Med. 2009 Feb;36(2):157-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.06.028. Epub 2007 Nov 19.
2
EMS provider determinations of necessity for transport and reimbursement for EMS response, medical care, and transport: combined resource document for the National Association of EMS Physicians position statements.EMS 供应商对转运必要性的判断,以及对 EMS 响应、医疗护理和转运的报销:美国急诊医师协会立场声明的综合资源文件。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2011 Oct-Dec;15(4):562-9. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2011.598625. Epub 2011 Jul 28.
3
EMS-initiated refusal and alternative methods of transport.紧急医疗服务引发的拒绝及其他转运方式
Prehosp Emerg Care. 1998 Jan-Mar;2(1):18-22. doi: 10.1080/10903129808958834.
4
Paramedic initiated non-transport of pediatric patients.护理人员发起的儿科患者非转运情况。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2006 Apr-Jun;10(2):213-9. doi: 10.1080/10903120500541308.
5
Adequacy of online medical command communication and emergency medical services documentation of informed refusals.在线医疗指挥通信的充分性以及知情拒绝的紧急医疗服务文件记录。
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Oct;12(10):970-7. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.06.004.
6
Can emergency medical service staff predict the disposition of patients they are transporting?紧急医疗服务人员能否预测他们正在运送的患者的处置情况?
Emerg Med J. 2008 Oct;25(10):691-4. doi: 10.1136/emj.2007.054924.
7
Emergency medical services education, community outreach, and protocols for stroke and chest pain in North Carolina.北卡罗来纳州的紧急医疗服务教育、社区宣传以及中风和胸痛治疗方案。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2008 Jul-Sep;12(3):366-71. doi: 10.1080/10903120802100100.
8
Outcomes of patients not transported after calling 911.拨打911后未被转运患者的结局。
J Emerg Med. 2005 May;28(4):449-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2004.11.025.
9
Physician medical oversight in emergency medical services: where are we?急诊医疗服务中的医师医疗监督:我们处于什么状况?
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2009 Jan-Mar;13(1):53-8. doi: 10.1080/10903120802471964.
10
Designated medical directors for emergency medical services: recruitment and roles.紧急医疗服务指定医疗主任:招募与职责
J Rural Health. 2009 Fall;25(4):392-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2009.00250.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Practice of Pre-Hospital Emergency Care and Associated Factors in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Facility-Based Cross-Sectional Study Design.埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴的院前急救实践及相关因素:基于机构的横断面研究设计
Open Access Emerg Med. 2023 Sep 6;15:277-287. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S424814. eCollection 2023.
2
Non-Conveyance Due to Patient-Initiated Refusal in Emergency Medical Services: A Retrospective Population-Based Registry Analysis Study in Riyadh Province, Saudi Arabia.由于患者主动拒绝,导致紧急医疗服务无法送达:沙特阿拉伯利雅得省的一项回顾性基于人群的登记分析研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 2;18(17):9252. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18179252.
3
Outcomes in children evaluated but not transported by ambulance personnel: retrospective cohort study.
经评估但未由救护人员转运的儿童的结局:回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2019 Oct 23;3(1):e000523. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2019-000523. eCollection 2019.
4
Innovation in the use of motor ambulance for prehospital emergency care.在院前急救护理中使用机动救护车的创新。
J Educ Health Promot. 2019 Feb 15;8:38. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_249_18. eCollection 2019.
5
The ambulance nurse experiences of non-conveying patients.救护车护士对不转运患者的体验。
J Clin Nurs. 2019 Jan;28(1-2):235-244. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14626. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
6
Telehealth-Enabled Emergency Medical Services Program Reduces Ambulance Transport to Urban Emergency Departments.启用远程医疗的紧急医疗服务项目减少了前往城市急诊科的救护车运输量。
West J Emerg Med. 2016 Nov;17(6):713-720. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2016.8.30660. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
7
Assessment of prehospital medical care for the patients transported to emergency department by ambulance.对通过救护车转运至急诊科的患者的院前医疗护理评估。
Turk J Emerg Med. 2015 Nov 17;15(3):122-5. doi: 10.1016/j.tjem.2015.11.005. eCollection 2015 Sep.
8
Can Medical Decision-making at the Scene by EMS Staff Reduce the Number of Unnecessary Ambulance Transportations, but Still Be Safe?急救人员在现场进行的医疗决策能否减少不必要的救护车转运次数,同时确保安全?
PLoS Curr. 2015 Jun 30;7:ecurrents.dis.f426e7108516af698c8debf18810aa0a. doi: 10.1371/currents.dis.f426e7108516af698c8debf18810aa0a.
9
Physiological-social scores in predicting outcomes of prehospital internal patients.生理-社会评分对院前内科患者预后的预测作用
Emerg Med Int. 2014;2014:312189. doi: 10.1155/2014/312189. Epub 2014 Sep 14.
10
Exploring Factors Affecting Emergency Medical Services Staffs' Decision about Transporting Medical Patients to Medical Facilities.探索影响紧急医疗服务人员将医疗患者转运至医疗机构决策的因素。
Emerg Med Int. 2014;2014:215329. doi: 10.1155/2014/215329. Epub 2014 May 7.