Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21209, USA.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2011 Oct-Dec;15(4):562-9. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2011.598625. Epub 2011 Jul 28.
With increasing demands for emergency medical services (EMS), many EMS jurisdictions are utilizing EMS provider-initiated nontransport policies as a method to offload potentially nonemergent patients from the EMS system. EMS provider determination of medical necessity, resulting in nontransport of patients, has the potential to avert unnecessary emergency department visits. However, EMS systems that utilize these policies must have additional education for the providers, a quality improvement process, and active physician oversight. In addition, EMS provider determination of nontransport for a specific situation should be supported by evidence in the peer-reviewed literature that the practice is safe. Further, EMS systems that do not utilize these programs should not be financially penalized. Payment for EMS services should be based on the prudent layperson standard. EMS systems that do utilize nontransport policies should be appropriately reimbursed, as this represents potential cost savings to the health care system.
随着对紧急医疗服务(EMS)需求的增加,许多 EMS 管辖区正在使用 EMS 提供者发起的非转运政策,作为将潜在非紧急患者从 EMS 系统中转移的一种方法。EMS 提供者对医疗必要性的判断,导致患者无法转运,有可能避免不必要的急诊就诊。然而,使用这些政策的 EMS 系统必须为提供者提供额外的教育、质量改进流程和积极的医生监督。此外,EMS 提供者对特定情况的非转运决定应该得到同行评议文献中实践安全的证据的支持。此外,不使用这些计划的 EMS 系统不应受到经济处罚。EMS 服务的支付应基于谨慎的外行标准。确实使用非转运政策的 EMS 系统应得到适当的补偿,因为这代表了对医疗保健系统的潜在成本节约。