Di Russo Francesco, Aprile Teresa, Spitoni Grazia, Spinelli Donatella
Department of Education in Sports and Human Movement, University of Motor Sciences (IUSM), Rome, Italy.
Brain. 2008 Mar;131(Pt 3):842-54. doi: 10.1093/brain/awm281. Epub 2007 Nov 16.
Transient visual-evoked potentials (VEPs) were recorded in 11 patients with right brain damage and spatial neglect. High-resolution EEG was recorded using focal stimuli located in the four visual quadrants. VEPs to left stimuli, i.e. located in the neglected side, were compared to VEPs to right stimuli. Results showed that bottom-up processing of a visual stimulus located in the neglected hemifield was intact up to approximately 130 ms from stimulus onset. Hemispheric differences were not significant for either C1 or P1 components representing the activity of striate and extrastriate areas, respectively. In contrast, visual processing in more dorsal areas adjacent to the superior parietal lobe was changed from normal. We failed to record the N1a component for left visual field stimuli expected in the 130-160 ms time range. Furthermore, the N1p (140-180 ms) and P2 (180-220) components were delayed and/or reduced in amplitude for stimuli located on the neglected side. The source of the N1a was previously localized in the intraparietal sulcus in the dorsal occipital cortex; N1p may represent a reactivation of area V3A and P2 reactivation of occipital visual areas including V1 due to top-down feedbacks. Six patients with left brain damage (LBD) and no neglect and 21 healthy subjects were also tested in the same experimental conditions used for patients with neglect. In LBD patients, all components evoked by contralesional stimuli were comparable to ipsilesional components. Overall, data allow localizing in time and space the processing deficit specific for patients with neglect. The first takes place around 130 ms in the bottom-up processing at the level of the anatomically intact dorsal parietal areas; the second is located at the level of the reactivation of the striate and extrastriate areas via feedback connections from higher visual areas. The two functional impairments were limited to left-field stimuli.
对11例右脑损伤并伴有空间忽视的患者记录了瞬态视觉诱发电位(VEP)。使用位于四个视觉象限的局部刺激记录高分辨率脑电图。将位于被忽视侧(即左侧)的刺激所诱发的VEP与右侧刺激所诱发的VEP进行比较。结果显示,位于被忽视半视野的视觉刺激的自下而上加工在刺激开始后约130毫秒内是完整的。分别代表纹状区和纹外区活动的C1和P1成分在半球间差异不显著。相比之下,与顶上叶相邻的更靠背侧区域的视觉加工发生了异常。我们未能记录到在130 - 160毫秒时间范围内左侧视野刺激预期出现的N1a成分。此外,对于位于被忽视侧的刺激,N1p(140 - 180毫秒)和P2(180 - 220毫秒)成分的潜伏期延迟和/或波幅降低。N1a的来源先前定位于枕叶背侧皮质的顶内沟;N1p可能代表V3A区的重新激活,而P2可能代表由于自上而下的反馈导致包括V1在内的枕叶视觉区的重新激活。对6例无忽视症状的左脑损伤(LBD)患者和21名健康受试者也在用于忽视患者的相同实验条件下进行了测试。在LBD患者中,对侧刺激诱发的所有成分与同侧成分相当。总体而言,这些数据能够在时间和空间上定位忽视患者特有的加工缺陷。第一个缺陷发生在约130毫秒时,在解剖结构完整的背侧顶叶区域水平的自下而上加工过程中;第二个缺陷位于通过来自更高视觉区域的反馈连接对纹状区和纹外区进行重新激活的水平。这两种功能障碍仅限于左侧视野刺激。