Halkitis Perry N
Center for Health, Identity, Behavior & Prevention Studies (CHIBPS), Department of Applied Psychology, New York University, NY, USA.
J LGBT Health Res. 2007;3(1):37-48. doi: 10.1300/j463v03n01_05.
These analyses are part of a larger study designed to investigate the developmental, behavioral, and sociocultural lives of gay and bisexual men who identify as barebackers. We examined the sexual behaviors of these men, as well as the relation of these behaviors to matters of identity and perceived benefits of barebacking. Of the 102 men who completed the study, about half reported barebacking with main partners and 92% reported barebacking behaviors with casual partners whom they met in a variety of social venues. The frequency of these behaviors with casual partners (but not main partners) varied across serostatus of participant and the serostatus of his partners. Identification as a barebacker was unrelated to the frequency of these sexual acts. This sample of self-identified barebackers perceived greater benefits to barebacking than a more general community- based sample. Although previous research has contended that intention is central to the construct of barebacking, only half of our sample indicated that they understood the construct in these terms. It appears that gay and bisexual men, despite their identification as barebackers, incorporate harm reduction strategies with regard to this behavior which is guided by their perception of risk related to specific sexual acts, as well as the seroconcordance of their casual sexual partners. Our findings suggest that barebacking is a construct that is only beginning to be understood, and that more detailed understandings of this construct are needed to disentangle the meanings that gay and bisexual men ascribe to this behavior, including the relationship between both individual and partner serostatus.
这些分析是一项更大规模研究的一部分,该研究旨在调查那些自认为是无保护肛交者的男同性恋者和双性恋者的发育、行为及社会文化生活。我们研究了这些男性的性行为,以及这些行为与身份认同问题和无保护肛交的感知益处之间的关系。在完成研究的102名男性中,约一半报告与主要伴侣有无保护肛交行为,92%报告与在各种社交场合结识的临时伴侣有无保护肛交行为。与临时伴侣(而非主要伴侣)进行这些行为的频率因参与者及其伴侣的血清学状态而异。自认为是无保护肛交者与这些性行为的频率无关。与更广泛的基于社区的样本相比,这个自认为是无保护肛交者的样本认为无保护肛交有更大的益处。尽管先前的研究认为意图是无保护肛交概念的核心,但我们的样本中只有一半表示他们是从这些角度理解这一概念的。看来,男同性恋者和双性恋者尽管自认为是无保护肛交者,但在这种行为上采用了减少伤害的策略,这是由他们对特定性行为相关风险的认知以及临时性伴侣的血清学一致性所引导的。我们的研究结果表明,无保护肛交这一概念才刚刚开始被理解,需要对这一概念有更详细的了解,以厘清男同性恋者和双性恋者赋予这种行为的意义,包括个人和伴侣血清学状态之间的关系。