Kempen Gertrudis I J M, Yardley Lucy, van Haastregt Jolanda C M, Zijlstra G A Rixt, Beyer Nina, Hauer Klaus, Todd Chris
School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, The Netherlands.
Age Ageing. 2008 Jan;37(1):45-50. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afm157. Epub 2007 Nov 20.
the 16-item Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) has been shown to have excellent reliability and construct validity. However, for practical and clinical purposes, a shortened version of the FES-I would be useful.
to develop and validate a shortened version of FES-I while preserving good psychometric properties.
initial development of a shortened version using data from a UK survey (Short FES-I; n = 704), test of reliability and validity of the Short FES-I using data from a Dutch survey (n = 300).
community samples.
comparison of reliability and validity of the Short FES-I and the FES-I in a random sample of 193 people aged between 70 and 92.
the internal and 4-week test-retest reliability of the Short FES-I is excellent (Cronbach's alpha 0.92, intra-class coefficient 0.83) and comparable to the FES-I. The correlation between the Short FES-I and the FES-I is 0.97. Patterns in differences with respect to mean scores according to age, sex, falls history, and overall fear of falling are similar for the Short FES-I and the FES-I. The FES-I had slightly better power to discriminate between groups differentiated by age, sex, falls history, and fear falling, but differences are small.
the Short FES-I is a good and feasible measure to assess fear of falling in older persons. However, if researchers or clinicians are particularly interested in the distributions of specific fear of falling-related activities not included in the Short FES-I, the use of the full FES-I is recommended.
16项国际跌倒效能量表(FES-I)已被证明具有出色的信度和结构效度。然而,出于实际和临床目的,FES-I的简化版本会很有用。
开发并验证FES-I的简化版本,同时保持良好的心理测量特性。
使用来自英国一项调查的数据初步开发简化版本(简版FES-I;n = 704),并使用来自荷兰一项调查的数据(n = 300)对简版FES-I进行信度和效度测试。
社区样本。
在193名年龄在70至92岁之间的随机样本中比较简版FES-I和FES-I的信度和效度。
简版FES-I的内部信度和4周重测信度极佳(克朗巴哈系数α为0.92,组内相关系数为0.83),与FES-I相当。简版FES-I与FES-I之间的相关性为0.97。简版FES-I和FES-I在根据年龄、性别、跌倒史和总体跌倒恐惧划分的平均得分差异模式相似。FES-I在区分不同年龄、性别、跌倒史和跌倒恐惧的组时,辨别力略强,但差异很小。
简版FES-I是评估老年人跌倒恐惧的一种良好且可行的测量方法。然而,如果研究人员或临床医生对简版FES-I未涵盖的特定跌倒恐惧相关活动的分布特别感兴趣,建议使用完整的FES-I。