Taft Sarah C, Weiss Alison A
Department of Molecular Genetics, Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Cincinnati, 231 Albert Sabin Way, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0524, USA.
Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2008 Jan;15(1):71-5. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00321-07. Epub 2007 Nov 21.
Anthrax vaccine adsorbed (AVA; BioThrax), the current FDA-licensed human anthrax vaccine, contains various amounts of the three anthrax toxin components, protective antigen (PA), lethal factor (LF), and edema factor (EF). While antibody to PA is sufficient to mediate protection against anthrax in animal models, it is not known if antibodies to LF or EF contribute to protection in humans. Toxin-neutralizing activity was evaluated in sera from AVA-vaccinated volunteers, all of whom had antibody responses to LF and EF, as well as PA. The contribution of antibodies to LF and EF was assessed using mouse macrophage J774A.1 cells by examining neutralization of LF-induced lysis using alamarBlue reduction and neutralization of EF-induced cyclic AMP increases by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Antibody responses to LF and EF were low compared to those to PA, and the amount of LF or EF in the assay could exceed the amount of antibodies to LF or EF. Higher titers were seen for most individuals when the LF or EF concentration was limiting compared to when LF or EF was in excess, initially suggesting that antibody to LF or EF augmented protection. However, depletion of LF and EF antibodies in sera did not result in a significant decrease in toxin neutralization. Overall, this study suggests that AVA-induced LF and EF antibodies do not significantly contribute to anthrax toxin neutralization in humans and that antibodies to PA are sufficient to neutralize toxin activity.
吸附型炭疽疫苗(AVA;BioThrax)是目前美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的人用炭疽疫苗,含有不同量的三种炭疽毒素成分:保护性抗原(PA)、致死因子(LF)和水肿因子(EF)。虽然在动物模型中,针对PA的抗体足以介导对炭疽的保护作用,但尚不清楚针对LF或EF的抗体是否对人类具有保护作用。对接种AVA的志愿者血清中的毒素中和活性进行了评估,所有志愿者对LF、EF以及PA均有抗体反应。通过使用alamarBlue还原法检测LF诱导的细胞裂解的中和作用,以及通过酶联免疫吸附测定法检测EF诱导的环磷酸腺苷(cAMP)增加的中和作用,利用小鼠巨噬细胞J774A.1细胞评估针对LF和EF的抗体的作用。与针对PA的抗体反应相比,针对LF和EF的抗体反应较低,并且检测中LF或EF的量可能超过针对LF或EF的抗体量。与LF或EF过量时相比,当LF或EF浓度处于限制水平时,大多数个体的滴度更高,这最初表明针对LF或EF的抗体增强了保护作用。然而,血清中LF和EF抗体的耗竭并未导致毒素中和作用显著降低。总体而言,本研究表明,AVA诱导的LF和EF抗体对人类炭疽毒素中和作用没有显著贡献,并且针对PA的抗体足以中和毒素活性。