Yan Andrew T, Yan Raymond T, Tan Mary, Huynh Thao, Soghrati Kamyar, Brunner Lawrence J, DeYoung Paul, Fitchett David H, Langer Anatoly, Goodman Shaun G
Division of Cardiology, Canadian Heart Research Centre, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Am Heart J. 2007 Dec;154(6):1108-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.07.040. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
There are limited data on the recent trend in the use of optimal evidence-based medical therapies after acute coronary syndromes (ACSs). We sought to evaluate (1) the temporal changes in medical management of patients discharged after an ACS; (2) patient and practice characteristics associated with optimal medical therapy at discharge; and (3) the association between discharge medication use and 1-year outcome.
The Canadian ACS I (September 1999-June 2001) and ACS II (October 2002-December 2003) Registries were prospective, multicenter, observational studies of 6853 patients admitted for ACS. We examined the discharge use of medications among 5833 hospital survivors who did not have any contraindications to antiplatelet/anticoagulant, beta-blocker, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, or lipid-modifying therapies. Optimal medical therapy was defined as the use of all indicated medications. Follow-up data at 1 year were collected by telephone interview. We performed hierarchical logistic regression to identify patient characteristics and care patterns associated with optimal medical treatment and to examine its relationship with 1-year mortality.
There were significant increases in the discharge use of all 4 classes of medications over time; 28.9% and 51.8% of patients in ACS I and ACS II Registries, respectively, were prescribed optimal medical therapy (P < .001). Advanced age, female sex, prior heart failure, renal dysfunction, and coronary bypass surgery during hospitalization were negative independent predictors of optimal medical therapy. Conversely, enrollment in ACS II Registry, history of dyslipidemia, presence of ST elevation and abnormal cardiac biomarker, previous myocardial infarction, and previous coronary revascularization were independently associated with the use of combination therapy. After adjusting for other validated prognosticators, patients receiving optimal medical therapy had significantly lower 1-year mortality (adjusted odds ratio 0.54, 95% confidence interval 0.36-0.81, P = .003) compared with those given 0 or 1 drug at discharge. Over the 1-year follow-up period, substantial numbers of patients discontinued therapies, whereas others were initiated on treatment.
Despite the temporal increases in the combined use of evidence-based pharmacologic therapies, which is associated with improved outcome, medical management of ACS remains suboptimal. Quality improvement strategies are needed to enhance the appropriate use of effective therapies, targeting specifically the high-risk but undertreated patients who may derive the greatest therapeutic benefit.
关于急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)后使用最佳循证医学疗法的近期趋势,相关数据有限。我们旨在评估:(1)ACS后出院患者药物治疗的时间变化;(2)出院时与最佳药物治疗相关的患者及医疗实践特征;(3)出院用药与1年预后之间的关联。
加拿大ACS I(1999年9月至2001年6月)和ACS II(2002年10月至2003年12月)登记研究为前瞻性、多中心、对6853例因ACS入院患者的观察性研究。我们检查了5833例无抗血小板/抗凝、β受体阻滞剂、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或调脂治疗禁忌证的出院存活患者的药物使用情况。最佳药物治疗定义为使用所有指征性药物。通过电话访谈收集1年的随访数据。我们进行分层逻辑回归以确定与最佳药物治疗相关的患者特征和护理模式,并检验其与1年死亡率的关系。
随着时间推移,所有4类药物的出院使用情况均显著增加;ACS I和ACS II登记研究中分别有28.9%和51.8%的患者接受了最佳药物治疗(P <.001)。高龄、女性、既往心力衰竭、肾功能不全以及住院期间行冠状动脉搭桥手术是最佳药物治疗的负性独立预测因素。相反,纳入ACS II登记研究、血脂异常病史、ST段抬高和心脏生物标志物异常、既往心肌梗死以及既往冠状动脉血运重建与联合治疗的使用独立相关。在调整其他已验证的预后因素后,与出院时接受0种或1种药物治疗的患者相比,接受最佳药物治疗的患者1年死亡率显著降低(调整后的优势比为0.54,95%置信区间为0.36 - 0.81,P =.003)。在1年随访期内,大量患者停止治疗,而其他患者开始接受治疗。
尽管循证药物联合治疗的使用随时间增加,且与改善预后相关,但ACS的药物治疗仍未达到最佳。需要实施质量改进策略,以促进有效疗法的合理使用,尤其针对可能从治疗中获得最大益处的高危但治疗不足的患者。