Raj Phani K
Technology & Management Systems, Inc., Burlington, MA 01803, United States.
J Hazard Mater. 2008 Nov 15;159(1):61-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.09.120. Epub 2007 Oct 7.
The NFPA 59A Standard and the Federal Regulation, 49 CFR Part 193, stipulate a level of 5 kW/m(2) as the criterion for determining the hazard distance to people exposure from a LNG fire. Another regulation (24CFR, Section 51.204) while stipulating a lower exposure limit of 1.42 kW/m(2) provides administrative relief from the regulation if mitigation measures are provided. Several countries in Europe and the Far East have adopted both a specified heat flux value (generally, 5 kW/m(2)) as well as modified dose criteria for human exposure hazard calculation in risk assessments. In some cases, the regulations in Europe require the use of lower values for children and physically challenged persons. This paper reviews the available literature on the phenomenon of skin burn caused by radiant heat exposure. The associated thermal and spectral properties of human skin are reviewed. The basis for regulatory setting, of 5 kW/m(2) and other exposure criteria (as a part of hazard and risk calculations) for evaluating distances to hazards from the exposure of people to radiant heat effects of large fires, is evaluated. An example calculation is provided to show the extent of reduction in the hazard distance to specified radiant heat flux from a fire when the spectral reflection and absorption properties of skin are considered with and without the inclusion of the mitigating effects of clothing. The results indicate that hazard distances calculated including the reflective and band absorptive properties (in IR wavelength) of skin results in a reduction of between 30 and 50% in the hazard distances obtained with current methodology, which ignores these effects. Unfortunately, there are no test results, from full-scale human-exposure-to-IR radiation, with which these predictions can be compared.
美国国家防火协会(NFPA)59A标准和联邦法规(49 CFR Part 193)规定,5千瓦/平方米的水平作为确定液化天然气火灾对人员暴露危害距离的标准。另一项法规(24 CFR,第51.204节)在规定较低暴露限值为1.42千瓦/平方米的同时,如果采取了缓解措施,则可提供行政豁免。欧洲和远东的几个国家在风险评估中采用了特定的热通量值(通常为5千瓦/平方米)以及修改后的人体暴露危害计算剂量标准。在某些情况下,欧洲的法规要求对儿童和身体有残疾的人使用较低的值。本文回顾了关于辐射热暴露导致皮肤烧伤现象的现有文献。对人体皮肤相关的热学和光谱特性进行了综述。评估了将5千瓦/平方米及其他暴露标准(作为危害和风险计算的一部分)用于评估人员暴露于大型火灾辐射热影响下的危害距离的监管设定依据。提供了一个示例计算,以显示在考虑和不考虑衣物缓解效果的情况下,当考虑皮肤的光谱反射和吸收特性时,火灾到特定辐射热通量的危害距离减少的程度。结果表明,包括皮肤的反射和波段吸收特性(在红外波长)计算得出的危害距离,比目前忽略这些影响的方法得出的危害距离减少了30%至50%。不幸的是,没有全尺寸人体暴露于红外辐射的测试结果可与这些预测进行比较。