Lambert-Niclot Sidonie, Flandre Philippe, Canestri Ana, Peytavin Gilles, Blanc Christine, Agher Rachid, Soulié Cathia, Wirden Marc, Katlama Christine, Calvez Vincent, Marcelin Anne-Geneviève
Department of Virology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, 83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, Paris 75013, France.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008 Feb;52(2):491-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00909-07. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
The objective of this study was to characterize the mutations selected by darunavir (DRV) use in protease inhibitor (PI)-experienced patients and the associated factors. We analyzed treatment failure in 54 PI-experienced human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients on a DRV- and ritonavir-containing regimen. Viral genotyping was carried out at the baseline, at between 1 and 3 months of treatment, and at between 3 and 6 months of treatment to search for the selection of mutations conferring resistance to PIs. The median baseline HIV RNA level was 4.9 log(10) copies/ml, and the median CD4 count was 87 cells/mm(3). At the baseline, the median numbers of resistance mutations were as follows: 3 DRV resistance mutations, 4 major PI resistance mutations, and 10 minor PI resistance mutations. The most common mutations that emerged at rebound included V32I (44%), I54M/L (24%), L33F (25%), I84V (21%), and L89V (12%). Multivariate analysis showed that higher baseline HIV RNA levels and smaller numbers of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor simultaneously used with DRV were associated with a higher risk of DRV resistance mutation selection. By contrast, L76V, a known DRV resistance mutation, was found to decrease the risk of selection of another DRV resistance mutation. The occurrence of virological failure while a patient was on DRV was associated with the selection of mutations that increased the level of DRV resistance without affecting susceptibility to tipranavir (TPV). In these PI-treated patients who displayed treatment failure while they were on a DRV-containing regimen, we confirmed the set of emerging mutations associated with DRV failure and identified the factors associated with the selection of these mutations. TPV susceptibility does not seem to be affected by the selection of a DRV resistance mutation.
本研究的目的是描述在接受过蛋白酶抑制剂(PI)治疗的患者中,使用达芦那韦(DRV)后所选择的突变及其相关因素。我们分析了54例接受过PI治疗的人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染患者在含DRV和利托那韦的治疗方案中的治疗失败情况。在基线、治疗1至3个月之间以及治疗3至6个月之间进行病毒基因分型,以寻找赋予对PI耐药性的突变选择。基线时HIV RNA水平的中位数为4.9 log(10)拷贝/毫升,CD4细胞计数的中位数为87个细胞/立方毫米。基线时,耐药突变的中位数如下:3个DRV耐药突变、4个主要PI耐药突变和10个次要PI耐药突变。反弹时出现的最常见突变包括V32I(44%)、I54M/L(24%)、L33F(25%)、I84V(21%)和L89V(12%)。多变量分析显示,较高的基线HIV RNA水平以及与DRV同时使用的核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂数量较少与DRV耐药突变选择的较高风险相关。相比之下,已知的DRV耐药突变L76V被发现可降低另一种DRV耐药突变选择的风险。患者在接受DRV治疗期间病毒学失败的发生与增加DRV耐药水平但不影响对替拉那韦(TPV)敏感性的突变选择有关。在这些接受PI治疗且在含DRV方案中出现治疗失败的患者中,我们确认了与DRV失败相关的一系列新出现的突变,并确定了与这些突变选择相关的因素。TPV敏感性似乎不受DRV耐药突变选择的影响。