• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有开放性肾切开取石术病史患者的一步法经皮肾造瘘术:与筋膜扩张器系统的比较

One-step percutaneous nephrostomy in patients with a history of open nephrolithotomy: comparison with the fascial dilator system.

作者信息

Wen Xingqiao, Gao Xin, Li Xiaojuan, Lu Minhua, Cai Yubin, Qiu Jianguang, Xiao Cuilan

机构信息

Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2007 Nov;21(11):1281-5. doi: 10.1089/end.2007.0028.

DOI:10.1089/end.2007.0028
PMID:18042015
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

A percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) done on the same side as a previous open nephrolithotomy is always technically challenging. A novel one-step PCN tube that allows the puncture and placement of a drainage tube to be done in a single step has been developed. The hydrophilic coating on the tube's surface significantly reduces friction and allows easier insertion. We evaluated the tube's efficiency and safety compared with the traditional fascial dilator system.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-five patients with a history of open nephrolithotomy were randomly allocated (with the aid of a computer-derived assignment number) into two groups to have PCN performed in one step or multiple steps. In the one-step group, a new type of PCN tube was used. In the multistep group, fascial dilators were used serially prior to tube insertion. The two groups were similar in terms of mean age, width of target calix, and baseline serum creatinine and hemoglobin concentrations. The operating times, intubation rates, and complications in the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

The mean number of attempts required to access the collecting system was 1.1 +/- 0.6 in the one-step group v 2.3 +/- 1.2 in the multistep group (P = 0.002), the successful intubation rate was 96.9% v 78.8% (P = 0.012), the mean operating time was 10.2 +/- 2.4 minutes v 25.6 +/- 2.8 minutes (P = 0.029), and the rate of intraoperative and postoperative complications was 3.1% v 15.2%, respectively (P = 0.019). No major complications occurred in the one-step group.

CONCLUSIONS

The one-step PCN tube is a convenient and efficacious method for accessing an anatomic region where open nephrolithotomy was done previously and is a simple method for nephrostomy tube placement.

摘要

背景与目的

在先前进行过开放性肾切开取石术的同一侧进行经皮肾造瘘术(PCN)在技术上一直具有挑战性。已研发出一种新型的一步式PCN管,可在一步操作中完成穿刺和引流管置入。该管表面的亲水涂层显著降低了摩擦力,使插入更容易。我们将该管与传统筋膜扩张器系统相比,评估了其有效性和安全性。

患者与方法

65例有开放性肾切开取石术病史的患者借助计算机生成的分配号码随机分为两组,分别接受一步法或多步法PCN。一步法组使用新型PCN管。多步法组在置入导管前依次使用筋膜扩张器。两组在平均年龄、目标肾盏宽度、基线血清肌酐和血红蛋白浓度方面相似。比较了两组的手术时间、插管成功率和并发症情况。

结果

一步法组进入集合系统所需的平均尝试次数为1.1±0.6次,多步法组为2.3±1.2次(P = 0.002);成功插管率分别为96.9%和78.8%(P = 0.012);平均手术时间分别为10.2±2.4分钟和25.6±2.8分钟(P = 0.029);术中和术后并发症发生率分别为3.1%和15.2%(P = 0.019)。一步法组未发生重大并发症。

结论

一步式PCN管是进入先前进行过开放性肾切开取石术的解剖区域的一种方便且有效的方法,也是一种简单的肾造瘘管置入方法。

相似文献

1
One-step percutaneous nephrostomy in patients with a history of open nephrolithotomy: comparison with the fascial dilator system.有开放性肾切开取石术病史患者的一步法经皮肾造瘘术:与筋膜扩张器系统的比较
J Endourol. 2007 Nov;21(11):1281-5. doi: 10.1089/end.2007.0028.
2
Ureteric stents vs percutaneous nephrostomy for initial urinary drainage in children with obstructive anuria and acute renal failure due to ureteric calculi: a prospective, randomised study.输尿管支架与经皮肾造瘘术用于输尿管结石所致梗阻性无尿和急性肾衰竭患儿的初始尿液引流:一项前瞻性随机研究
BJU Int. 2015 Mar;115(3):473-9. doi: 10.1111/bju.12768. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
3
Nephrostomy tract dilation using a balloon dilator in percutaneous renal surgery: experience with 95 cases and comparison with the fascial dilator system.经皮肾手术中使用球囊扩张器进行肾造瘘通道扩张:95例经验及与筋膜扩张器系统的比较
Urol Int. 2003;71(4):382-4. doi: 10.1159/000074090.
4
One-step percutaneous nephrolithotomy sheath versus standard two-step technique.一步法经皮肾镜取石术鞘与标准两步法技术的比较
Urology. 2005 Nov;66(5):953-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.05.031.
5
Are multiple nephrostomy tubes necessary after multitract percutaneous nephrolithotomy? A randomized comparison of single versus multiple nephrostomy tubes.多通道经皮肾镜取石术后是否需要留置多根肾造瘘管?单通道与多通道肾造瘘管随机比较。
J Endourol. 2009 Nov;23(11):1831-4. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0452.
6
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: primary patients versus patients with history of open renal surgery.
J Endourol. 2008 Dec;22(12):2671-5. doi: 10.1089/end.2007.0431.
7
Utilization of a modified Clavien Classification System in reporting complications after ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrostomy tube placement: comparison to standard Society of Interventional Radiology practice guidelines.改良 Clavien 分类系统在超声引导经皮肾造瘘管置管术后并发症报告中的应用:与标准介入放射学会实践指南的比较。
Urology. 2013 Jun;81(6):1161-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.02.038. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
8
The place of computed tomography as a guidance modality in percutaneous nephrostomy: analysis of a 10-year single-center experience.计算机断层扫描在经皮肾造瘘术中作为引导方式的地位:一项为期10年的单中心经验分析。
Acta Radiol. 2007 Sep;48(7):806-13. doi: 10.1080/02841850701416528.
9
Supracostal tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a retrospective cohort study.经肋缘下无管微创经皮肾镜取石术:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Endourol. 2013 Mar;27(3):294-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0218. Epub 2012 Dec 5.
10
Reinforcement for percutaneous nephrostomy tubes with a new technique.经皮肾造瘘管的新加固技术。
J Endourol. 2011 Jan;25(1):41-4. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0209. Epub 2011 Jan 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness and safety of four tract dilation methods of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A meta-analysis.经皮肾镜取石术四种通道扩张方法的有效性和安全性:一项荟萃分析。
Exp Ther Med. 2020 Apr;19(4):2661-2671. doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.8486. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
2
Clinical application of percutaneous nephrostomy in some urologic diseases.
J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 2008 Aug;28(4):439-42. doi: 10.1007/s11596-008-0414-0. Epub 2008 Aug 15.