Suppr超能文献

多通道经皮肾镜取石术后是否需要留置多根肾造瘘管?单通道与多通道肾造瘘管随机比较。

Are multiple nephrostomy tubes necessary after multitract percutaneous nephrolithotomy? A randomized comparison of single versus multiple nephrostomy tubes.

机构信息

Urology Division, Department of Surgery, SN Medical College, Agra, India.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2009 Nov;23(11):1831-4. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0452.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Placement of multiple nephrostomy tubes is the standard practice after completion of multitract percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for complex/staghorn calculi. We conducted a study to see whether use of a single nephrostomy tube in comparison with multiple tubes reduces postoperative discomfort without compromising safety of the procedure.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred and ninety-two patients with complex/staghorn renal calculi who were treated with PCNL requiring multiple tracts were included in the study. The inclusion criteria included normal renal function, complete clearance of calculi, and no significant intraoperative complication. Patients were randomized into two groups on operation table at completion of procedure-group A, single nephrostomy tube placement after multitract PCNL; group B, one nephrostomy tube for each tract.

RESULTS

Postoperative analgesia requirement in group A was significantly less than that in group B (111.9 +/- 27.4 mg meperidine in group A; 165.8 +/- 34.4 mg in group B) (p < 0.001). The difference in average blood loss for two groups was not statistically significant (drop in hemoglobin: group A, 0.48 gm%; group B, 0.51 gm%) (p = 0.55). Three patients in group A and four in group B required blood transfusion (p = 0.65). The average hospital stay in group A (42.4 +/- 8.6 hours) was significantly shorter than that in group B (68.1 +/- 6 hours) (p < 0.001). No long-term squealae were noticed in the median follow-up of 18 months in any patient.

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrates that use of a single nephrostomy tube in multitract PCNL is safe and as effective as the conventional practice of placing multiple tubes. In addition, a single tube minimizes postoperative morbidity related to the drainage tubes.

摘要

目的

对于复杂性/鹿角状肾结石,经多通道经皮肾镜碎石取石术(PCNL)完成后,标准做法是放置多个肾造瘘管。我们进行了一项研究,旨在观察与使用多个肾造瘘管相比,使用单个肾造瘘管是否可以减轻术后不适,同时不影响手术安全性。

患者和方法

本研究纳入了 192 例接受多通道 PCNL 治疗且需要多通道的复杂性/鹿角状肾结石患者。纳入标准包括肾功能正常、结石完全清除和无明显术中并发症。患者在手术台上完成手术时随机分为两组:A 组,多通道 PCNL 后放置单个肾造瘘管;B 组,每个通道放置一个肾造瘘管。

结果

A 组术后镇痛需求明显少于 B 组(A 组 111.9±27.4mg 哌替啶;B 组 165.8±34.4mg)(p<0.001)。两组平均失血量差异无统计学意义(血红蛋白下降:A 组 0.48gm%;B 组 0.51gm%)(p=0.55)。A 组有 3 例和 B 组有 4 例需要输血(p=0.65)。A 组的平均住院时间(42.4±8.6 小时)明显短于 B 组(68.1±6 小时)(p<0.001)。在 18 个月的中位随访中,任何患者均未出现长期并发症。

结论

本研究表明,在多通道 PCNL 中使用单个肾造瘘管是安全的,与常规放置多个肾造瘘管的效果一样。此外,单个肾造瘘管可最大限度地减少与引流管相关的术后发病率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验