Van Ginderdeuren F, Verbanck S, Van Cauwelaert K, Vanlaethem S, Schuermans D, Vincken W, Malfroot A
Cystic Fibrosis Center, UZ Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Respiration. 2008;76(2):175-80. doi: 10.1159/000111818. Epub 2007 Nov 28.
Chest physiotherapy has been used for many years to assist in the removal of abnormal viscid bronchial secretions in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients.
This study compared the short-term effects of two physiotherapy regimens in patients with CF: autogenic drainage (AD) preceded by either saline inhalation ('saline(NEB) + AD') or by intrapulmonary percussive ventilation (IPV) with saline ('saline(IPV) + AD').
In a randomized crossover design, 20 clinically stable CF patients with similar pulmonary function at baseline received either 'saline(NEB) + AD' or 'saline(IPV) + AD' on 2 consecutive days. Transcutaneous oxygen saturation, heart rate, Borg dyspnea score and mucus wet weight were evaluated after 15 min of either saline(NEB) or saline(IPV), and after a subsequent 30 min of AD.
There were no significant changes in oxygen saturation, heart rate or Borg score at any point of either physiotherapy intervention. There was no significant difference in sputum wet weight recovered with either saline(NEB) (2.2 +/- 1.8 g, mean +/- SD) or saline(IPV) (1.7 +/- 1.9 g) alone. Subsequent AD did produce significantly greater amounts of sputum wet weight (p < 0.0001 for both) than in the initial saline delivery period, yet the amount of wet weight was similar irrespective of whether AD was preceded by saline(NEB) (9.7 +/- 6.5 g) or saline(IPV) (11.6 +/- 7.3 g).
Recovered sputum weight is similar whether AD is preceded by saline(NEB) or saline(IPV). The much greater amount of mucus obtained during the AD period than during the saline delivery period warrants further investigation.
胸部物理治疗多年来一直用于帮助囊性纤维化(CF)患者清除异常黏稠的支气管分泌物。
本研究比较了两种物理治疗方案对CF患者的短期效果:在自主引流(AD)之前进行盐水雾化吸入(“盐水(雾化)+ AD”)或在盐水肺内叩击通气(IPV)后进行自主引流(“盐水(IPV)+ AD”)。
采用随机交叉设计,20例基线肺功能相似的临床稳定CF患者连续2天接受“盐水(雾化)+ AD”或“盐水(IPV)+ AD”治疗。在盐水(雾化)或盐水(IPV)治疗15分钟后以及随后30分钟的AD治疗后,评估经皮血氧饱和度、心率、Borg呼吸困难评分和痰液湿重。
在任何一种物理治疗干预过程中的任何时间点,血氧饱和度、心率或Borg评分均无显著变化。单独使用盐水(雾化)(2.2±1.8 g,均值±标准差)或盐水(IPV)(1.7±1.9 g)回收的痰液湿重无显著差异。随后的AD治疗确实比初始盐水给药期产生了显著更多的痰液湿重(两者均p < 0.0001),然而,无论AD之前是盐水(雾化)(9.7±6.5 g)还是盐水(IPV)(11.6±7.3 g),湿重的量相似。
无论AD之前是盐水(雾化)还是盐水(IPV),回收的痰液重量相似。AD期间获得的黏液量比盐水给药期间多得多,这值得进一步研究。