Kaplan Edward L, Oakes J Michael, Johnson Dwight R
The World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Reference and Research on Streptococci, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2007 Dec;26(12):1110-6. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e31814615ac.
Previously, we reported an unexpectedly large percentage of failures by penicillin to eradicate group A streptococci (GAS) from the upper respiratory tract. Because penicillin has been the recommended therapy for the treatment of GAS pharyngitis, our report prompted controversy. Data from clinical trials in which our laboratory has participated demonstrated marked variation in GAS eradication rates among clinical sites. The reasons for such variation have never been adequately examined. We performed statistical analyses of site variation in eradication rates to assess the potential effect on reported reduced penicillin efficacy.
Penicillin GAS eradication rates were compared using data from 4 large multisite pharyngitis treatment trials (75 clinical sites; 1158 subjects). Variation in eradication rates among clinical sites was statistically evaluated [chi(2) tests and generalized estimating equation (GEE) regression models].
There was significant site-to-site variation in GAS eradication rates in each of the trials (range, 17-100%; P < 0.005) as well as between separate trials (mean range, 58-69%; P < 0.033). GEE modeling indicated that GAS eradication rates were significantly higher for clinical sites participating in more than one clinical trial.
The statistically significant site-to-site variation in penicillin eradication rates was related to factors (dependencies) at individual sites. Such factors may affect assessment of therapeutic efficacy and indicate a necessity for considering clinical site variation before reporting pooled efficacy data from multiple sites; combined data may result in misleading clinical implications. This is the first report documenting significant variation resulting from individual clinical site-related factors and offers a possible explanation for reduced penicillin eradication.
此前,我们报告了青霉素未能从上呼吸道根除 A 组链球菌(GAS)的失败率出人意料地高。由于青霉素一直是治疗 GAS 咽炎的推荐疗法,我们的报告引发了争议。我们实验室参与的临床试验数据显示,各临床地点的 GAS 根除率存在显著差异。但从未对这种差异的原因进行过充分研究。我们对根除率的地点差异进行了统计分析,以评估其对所报道的青霉素疗效降低的潜在影响。
使用来自 4 项大型多地点咽炎治疗试验(75 个临床地点;1158 名受试者)的数据比较青霉素 GAS 根除率。对临床地点之间根除率的差异进行了统计学评估(卡方检验和广义估计方程(GEE)回归模型)。
在每项试验中,GAS 根除率在各地点之间均存在显著差异(范围为 17% - 100%;P < 0.005),不同试验之间也存在差异(平均范围为 58% - 69%;P < 0.033)。GEE 模型表明,参与不止一项临床试验的临床地点的 GAS 根除率显著更高。
青霉素根除率在各地点之间具有统计学意义的显著差异与各个地点的因素(相关性)有关。这些因素可能会影响对治疗效果的评估,并表明在报告来自多个地点的汇总疗效数据之前,有必要考虑临床地点差异;合并数据可能会产生误导性的临床意义。这是第一份记录由个体临床地点相关因素导致显著差异的报告,并为青霉素根除率降低提供了一种可能的解释。