• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Predicting Participation in Psychiatric Randomized Controlled Trials: Insights From the STEP-BD.预测参与精神科随机对照试验:来自STEP-BD研究的见解
Psychiatr Serv. 2015 Aug 1;66(8):817-23. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300557. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
2
Do Patients at Sites With High RCT Enrollment Propensity Have Better Outcomes?具有高随机对照试验入组倾向的研究点的患者预后更好吗?
Med Care. 2015 Nov;53(11):989-95. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000429.
3
Advancing bipolar disorder: key lessons from the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for Bipolar Disorder (STEP-BD).推进双相障碍的研究进展:从双相障碍的系统治疗强化研究(STEP-BD)中获得的重要经验。
Can J Psychiatry. 2010 Mar;55(3):136-43. doi: 10.1177/070674371005500304.
4
Demographic and diagnostic characteristics of the first 1000 patients enrolled in the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for Bipolar Disorder (STEP-BD).双相情感障碍系统治疗强化项目(STEP-BD)纳入的首批1000例患者的人口统计学和诊断特征。
Bipolar Disord. 2004 Dec;6(6):460-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2004.00158.x.
5
Predicting placebo response in adolescents with major depressive disorder: The Adolescent Placebo Impact Composite Score (APICS).预测青少年重度抑郁症的安慰剂反应:青少年安慰剂影响综合评分(APICS)。
J Psychiatr Res. 2015 Sep;68:346-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2015.05.003. Epub 2015 May 15.
6
Approaching the challenge of bipolar depression: results from STEP-BD.
Am J Psychiatry. 2007 Sep;164(9):1301-3. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07060926.
7
Rationale, design, and methods of the systematic treatment enhancement program for bipolar disorder (STEP-BD).双相情感障碍系统治疗强化项目(STEP-BD)的基本原理、设计与方法。
Biol Psychiatry. 2003 Jun 1;53(11):1028-42. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(03)00165-3.
8
Adjunctive antidepressant use and symptomatic recovery among bipolar depressed patients with concomitant manic symptoms: findings from the STEP-BD.伴有躁狂症状的双相抑郁患者辅助使用抗抑郁药与症状恢复情况:来自双相情感障碍系统治疗强化项目(STEP-BD)的研究结果
Am J Psychiatry. 2007 Sep;164(9):1348-55. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.05122032.
9
Generalizability of findings from efficacy trials for chronic depression: an analysis of eligibility criteria.慢性抑郁症疗效试验结果的可推广性:纳入标准分析
Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Jul;65(7):897-904. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300309.
10
Prescription patterns of psychotropic medications in elderly compared with younger participants who achieved a "recovered" status in the systematic treatment enhancement program for bipolar disorder.与在双相情感障碍系统治疗强化项目中达到“康复”状态的年轻参与者相比,老年参与者精神类药物的处方模式。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2008 Nov;16(11):922-33. doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e318187135f.

引用本文的文献

1
Generalizability of findings from four clinical cohort studies and a general population study to patients with bipolar I disorder in outpatient treatment in the Netherlands.四项临床队列研究和一项普通人群研究的结果对荷兰门诊治疗的双相 I 型障碍患者的可推广性。
Int J Bipolar Disord. 2025 Feb 15;13(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40345-025-00375-w.
2
Placebo Effect in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD). Placebo Response and Placebo Responders in OCD: The Trend Over Time.强迫症(OCD)中的安慰剂效应。OCD 中的安慰剂反应和安慰剂应答者:随时间变化的趋势。
Curr Neuropharmacol. 2019;17(8):741-774. doi: 10.2174/1570159X16666181026163922.

本文引用的文献

1
How generalisable to community samples are clinical trial results for treatment of nicotine dependence: a comparison of common eligibility criteria with respondents of a large representative general population survey.临床试验结果在治疗尼古丁依赖方面对社区样本的推广程度如何:与大型代表性一般人群调查的应答者相比,常见入选标准的比较。
Tob Control. 2011 Sep;20(5):338-43. doi: 10.1136/tc.2010.038703. Epub 2011 Jan 6.
2
Generalizability of clinical trials for cannabis dependence to community samples.临床试验对社区大麻依赖人群的泛化能力。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010 Sep 1;111(1-2):177-81. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.04.009. Epub 2010 May 26.
3
Increasing minority research participation through collaboration with community outpatient clinics: the STEP-BD Community Partners Experience.通过与社区门诊合作增加少数民族参与研究:STEP-BD 社区合作伙伴经验。
Clin Trials. 2009 Aug;6(4):344-54. doi: 10.1177/1740774509338427. Epub 2009 Jul 8.
4
Sources of site differences in the efficacy of a multisite clinical trial: the Treatment of SSRI-Resistant Depression in Adolescents.多中心临床试验疗效中部位差异的来源:青少年对选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂耐药性抑郁症的治疗
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009 Jun;77(3):439-50. doi: 10.1037/a0014834.
5
Predictors of refusal during a multi-step recruitment process for a randomized controlled trial of arthritis education.一项关节炎教育随机对照试验多步骤招募过程中拒绝参与的预测因素。
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Nov;73(2):280-5. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.06.017.
6
Generalizability of clinical trials for alcohol dependence to community samples.酒精依赖临床试验对社区样本的可推广性。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008 Nov 1;98(1-2):123-8. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.05.002. Epub 2008 Jun 24.
7
Unexpected individual clinical site variation in eradication rates of group a streptococci by penicillin in multisite clinical trials.在多中心临床试验中,青霉素对A组链球菌的根除率存在意外的个体临床部位差异。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2007 Dec;26(12):1110-6. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e31814615ac.
8
Psychosocial treatments for bipolar depression: a 1-year randomized trial from the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program.双相抑郁症的心理社会治疗:系统治疗强化项目的一项为期1年的随机试验
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007 Apr;64(4):419-26. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.64.4.419.
9
Effectiveness of adjunctive antidepressant treatment for bipolar depression.辅助抗抑郁药治疗双相抑郁症的疗效
N Engl J Med. 2007 Apr 26;356(17):1711-22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa064135. Epub 2007 Mar 28.
10
Recruitment and participation in clinical trials: socio-demographic, rural/urban, and health care access predictors.临床试验的招募与参与:社会人口统计学、城乡及医疗保健可及性预测因素
Cancer Detect Prev. 2006;30(1):24-33. doi: 10.1016/j.cdp.2005.12.001. Epub 2006 Feb 21.

预测参与精神科随机对照试验:来自STEP-BD研究的见解

Predicting Participation in Psychiatric Randomized Controlled Trials: Insights From the STEP-BD.

作者信息

Busch Alisa B, He Yulei, Zelevinsky Katya, O'Malley Alistair J

机构信息

Dr. Busch and Ms. Zelevinsky are with the Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston (e-mail:

出版信息

Psychiatr Serv. 2015 Aug 1;66(8):817-23. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300557. Epub 2015 Mar 31.

DOI:10.1176/appi.ps.201300557
PMID:25828873
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4888778/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Differences between patients who do and do not participate in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) could diminish the generalizability of results. This study examined whether RCT participants differ from non-RCT participants who are recruited from the same patient and provider population.

METHODS

The Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for Bipolar Disorder (STEP-BD) was an observational study in which participants also could enroll in an RCT during exacerbations of acute depression. The odds that a patient was enrolled in the STEP-BD acute depression RCTs (pharmacotherapy or psychotherapy) were estimated by fitting logistic regression models to STEP-BD participants with acute bipolar depression (total N=2,222; RCT, N=413; observational arm, N=1,809). Predictor variables included demographic characteristics, clinical information (including severity scales and comorbidities), and study site. The extent to which site determined RCT participation was estimated by using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

RESULTS

RCT participation was associated with having no insurance (odds ratio [OR]=1.58, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.16-2.15), a Clinical Global Impression score indicating greater severity (severe versus mild: OR=1.52, CI=1.08-2.15), and site (predicted probability range 8%-31%). Site was the most significant predictor of RCT enrollment (model excluding site, AUC=.61, CI=.58-.64; full model, AUC=.70, CI=.67-.73).

CONCLUSIONS

STEP-BD RCT participants differed from those in the observational arm in few clinical or demographic characteristics. Site was the strongest predictor of RCT participation. Future study is needed to understand site characteristics associated with RCT participation and whether these characteristics are associated with patient outcomes and to test these findings in usual-care settings.

摘要

目的

参与和未参与随机对照试验(RCT)的患者之间的差异可能会降低结果的普遍性。本研究调查了RCT参与者与从相同患者和医疗服务提供者群体中招募的非RCT参与者是否存在差异。

方法

双相情感障碍系统治疗强化项目(STEP-BD)是一项观察性研究,参与者在急性抑郁发作期间也可参加RCT。通过对患有急性双相抑郁的STEP-BD参与者(总数N = 2222;RCT组,N = 413;观察臂组,N = 1809)拟合逻辑回归模型,估计患者参加STEP-BD急性抑郁RCT(药物治疗或心理治疗)的几率。预测变量包括人口统计学特征、临床信息(包括严重程度量表和共病情况)以及研究地点。通过使用受试者操作特征曲线(AUC)下的面积来估计地点对RCT参与的决定程度。

结果

参加RCT与没有保险相关(比值比[OR] = 1.58,95%置信区间[CI] = 1.16 - 2.15),临床总体印象评分表明病情更严重(重度与轻度:OR = 1.52,CI = 1.08 - 2.15),以及与研究地点有关(预测概率范围8% - 31%)。地点是RCT入组的最显著预测因素(不包括地点的模型,AUC = 0.61,CI = 0.58 - 0.64;完整模型,AUC = 0.70,CI = 0.67 - 0.73)。

结论

STEP-BD RCT参与者与观察臂组参与者在临床或人口统计学特征方面差异不大。地点是RCT参与的最强预测因素。需要进一步研究以了解与RCT参与相关的地点特征,以及这些特征是否与患者结局相关,并在常规护理环境中验证这些发现。