Busch Alisa B, He Yulei, Zelevinsky Katya, O'Malley Alistair J
Dr. Busch and Ms. Zelevinsky are with the Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston (e-mail:
Psychiatr Serv. 2015 Aug 1;66(8):817-23. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300557. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
Differences between patients who do and do not participate in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) could diminish the generalizability of results. This study examined whether RCT participants differ from non-RCT participants who are recruited from the same patient and provider population.
The Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for Bipolar Disorder (STEP-BD) was an observational study in which participants also could enroll in an RCT during exacerbations of acute depression. The odds that a patient was enrolled in the STEP-BD acute depression RCTs (pharmacotherapy or psychotherapy) were estimated by fitting logistic regression models to STEP-BD participants with acute bipolar depression (total N=2,222; RCT, N=413; observational arm, N=1,809). Predictor variables included demographic characteristics, clinical information (including severity scales and comorbidities), and study site. The extent to which site determined RCT participation was estimated by using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
RCT participation was associated with having no insurance (odds ratio [OR]=1.58, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.16-2.15), a Clinical Global Impression score indicating greater severity (severe versus mild: OR=1.52, CI=1.08-2.15), and site (predicted probability range 8%-31%). Site was the most significant predictor of RCT enrollment (model excluding site, AUC=.61, CI=.58-.64; full model, AUC=.70, CI=.67-.73).
STEP-BD RCT participants differed from those in the observational arm in few clinical or demographic characteristics. Site was the strongest predictor of RCT participation. Future study is needed to understand site characteristics associated with RCT participation and whether these characteristics are associated with patient outcomes and to test these findings in usual-care settings.
参与和未参与随机对照试验(RCT)的患者之间的差异可能会降低结果的普遍性。本研究调查了RCT参与者与从相同患者和医疗服务提供者群体中招募的非RCT参与者是否存在差异。
双相情感障碍系统治疗强化项目(STEP-BD)是一项观察性研究,参与者在急性抑郁发作期间也可参加RCT。通过对患有急性双相抑郁的STEP-BD参与者(总数N = 2222;RCT组,N = 413;观察臂组,N = 1809)拟合逻辑回归模型,估计患者参加STEP-BD急性抑郁RCT(药物治疗或心理治疗)的几率。预测变量包括人口统计学特征、临床信息(包括严重程度量表和共病情况)以及研究地点。通过使用受试者操作特征曲线(AUC)下的面积来估计地点对RCT参与的决定程度。
参加RCT与没有保险相关(比值比[OR] = 1.58,95%置信区间[CI] = 1.16 - 2.15),临床总体印象评分表明病情更严重(重度与轻度:OR = 1.52,CI = 1.08 - 2.15),以及与研究地点有关(预测概率范围8% - 31%)。地点是RCT入组的最显著预测因素(不包括地点的模型,AUC = 0.61,CI = 0.58 - 0.64;完整模型,AUC = 0.70,CI = 0.67 - 0.73)。
STEP-BD RCT参与者与观察臂组参与者在临床或人口统计学特征方面差异不大。地点是RCT参与的最强预测因素。需要进一步研究以了解与RCT参与相关的地点特征,以及这些特征是否与患者结局相关,并在常规护理环境中验证这些发现。