Ulanowicz R E, Wolff W F
University of Maryland, Chesapeake Biological Laboratory, Solomons, Maryland 20688-0038.
Math Biosci. 1991 Feb;103(1):45-68. doi: 10.1016/0025-5564(91)90090-6.
An information-theoretic comparison of the topologies of observed ecosystem transfers and randomly constructed networks reveals that it is not easy to separate the members of the two sets. The distribution of ecosystem flow magnitudes, however, is seen to differ markedly from ordinary probability functions and to resemble the Cauchy or Pareto distributions. The agencies that impart such structure to ecological flow networks are not obvious, but one strong possibility is that autocatalysis, or indirect mutualism, promotes certain pathways at the expense of others, thereby enlarging the tail of the distribution of flow magnitudes.
对观测到的生态系统物质转移拓扑结构与随机构建网络进行的信息论比较表明,区分这两组成员并非易事。然而,生态系统流量大小的分布明显不同于普通概率函数,而是类似于柯西分布或帕累托分布。赋予生态流网络这种结构的因素并不明显,但一种很有可能的情况是,自催化或间接互利共生以牺牲其他路径为代价促进了某些路径,从而扩大了流量大小分布的尾部。