Suppr超能文献

头孢曲松与阿米卡星联用对比头孢他啶与阿米卡星联用治疗发热性粒细胞减少症

Ceftriaxone and amikacin versus ceftazidime and amikacin in febrile granulocytopenia.

作者信息

Schmid L, Jeschko M, Wilder-Smith C, Schafroth U, Thürlimann B, Pedrazzini A, Senn H

机构信息

Department of Medicine C, Kantonsspital, St. Gallen, Switzerland.

出版信息

Chemotherapy. 1991;37(5):346-52. doi: 10.1159/000238878.

Abstract

The efficacy and safety of the two antibiotic combinations, ceftazidime plus amikacin and ceftriaxone plus amikacin were compared in an open randomized trial. 100 episodes of neutropenia caused by malignant diseases and/or cytostatic drugs were evaluated in 66 males and 34 females with a mean age of 49.4 years. The types of infections treated were: septicemia 38, fever of undetermined origin 26, pneumonia 13, ear, nose and throat infections 11 and others 12. 17 episodes were not evaluable (6 protocol violations, 6 doubtful infections and 5 non-bacterial infections). The overall results were comparable, with a 74% success rate for ceftazidime and a 70% rate for ceftriaxone (criteria of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer). In the patients with septicemia, the success rate was 64% in the ceftriaxone and 57% in the ceftazidime group. Eight patients died during the treatment, in 5 cases due to infectious complications. There were no differences between the two groups in respect of efficacy or toxicity.

摘要

在一项开放性随机试验中,对头孢他啶加阿米卡星和头孢曲松加阿米卡星这两种抗生素组合的疗效和安全性进行了比较。对66名男性和34名女性(平均年龄49.4岁)因恶性疾病和/或细胞毒性药物引起的100例中性粒细胞减少症进行了评估。所治疗的感染类型包括:败血症38例、不明原因发热26例、肺炎13例、耳鼻喉感染11例以及其他感染12例。17例无法评估(6例违反方案、6例可疑感染和5例非细菌感染)。总体结果相当,头孢他啶的成功率为74%,头孢曲松的成功率为70%(欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织的标准)。在败血症患者中,头孢曲松组的成功率为64%,头孢他啶组为57%。治疗期间有8名患者死亡,5例死于感染性并发症。两组在疗效或毒性方面无差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验