Suppr超能文献

翻修膝关节置换术中用于恢复关节线的骨性标志的可靠性

Reliability of bony landmarks for restoration of the joint line in revision knee arthroplasty.

作者信息

Servien Elvire, Viskontas Darius, Giuffrè Bruno M, Coolican Myles R J, Parker David A

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Centre Albert Trillat, Hopital de la Croix Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 8 rue de Margnolles, 69300 Lyon-Caluire, France.

出版信息

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008 Mar;16(3):263-9. doi: 10.1007/s00167-007-0449-y. Epub 2007 Nov 29.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the reliability of bone landmarks for restoring the joint line in revision knee arthroplasty. The relationship of the femoral epicondyles, the tibial tubercle (TT) and the fibular head (FH) to the joint line was measured on 200 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI, 100 females, 100 males), including assessment on intraobserver and interobserver reliability. MRI scans demonstrating chondral lesions and osteoarthritis were excluded, as were patients with immature skeletons or a history of previous knee surgery. Sequences in sagittal, coronal and axial planes were used as well as cross-referencing with the same computer software. In order to account for size differences between patients, each bony landmark measurement was converted to a ratio relative to the femoral or/and tibial width. We found a transepicondylar axis equal to 3.11 degrees (+/-1.9). The average distance from the epicondyles to the joint line was respectively 23 mm on the lateral side and 28 mm on the medial side. However there was a variation of distance from the epicondyles of the joint line up to 11 mm and a significative difference was found between male and female. We determined the distances from the tip of the FH and from the TT to the joint line. The joint line-FH distance averaged 14 mm (range 4.1-22.13) with no gender difference. The joint line-TT distance was averaged 22 mm (range 10.61-32.09). We determined an epicondylar ratio (distance from the lateral epicondyle to the joint line related to the femoral width). We found this ratio averaged 28% with no gender difference (P = 0.09). There is a large variation of bony landmarks depending on the size of the individual. Considering this findings, the FH is not a reliable guide for the joint line in revision surgery. Previous studies have measured the absolute values from various landmarks to the joint line. This study provides a significant advantage, in that the level of the joint line can be determined for each individual by using a ratio to account for gender and size differences.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定在翻修膝关节置换术中用于恢复关节线的骨标志点的可靠性。在200例磁共振成像(MRI,100名女性,100名男性)上测量了股骨髁、胫骨结节(TT)和腓骨头(FH)与关节线的关系,包括评估观察者内和观察者间的可靠性。排除显示软骨损伤和骨关节炎的MRI扫描,以及骨骼未成熟或有膝关节既往手术史的患者。使用矢状面、冠状面和轴位平面的序列,并与同一计算机软件进行交叉参考。为了考虑患者之间的尺寸差异,每个骨标志点测量值均转换为相对于股骨或/和胫骨宽度的比率。我们发现髁间轴等于3.11度(±1.9)。从髁到关节线的平均距离在外侧分别为23mm,在内侧为28mm。然而,从髁到关节线的距离变化高达11mm,并且在男性和女性之间发现了显著差异。我们确定了从FH尖端和从TT到关节线的距离。关节线 - FH距离平均为14mm(范围4.1 - 22.13),无性别差异。关节线 - TT距离平均为22mm(范围10.61 - 32.09)。我们确定了一个髁比率(从外侧髁到关节线的距离与股骨宽度相关)。我们发现该比率平均为28%,无性别差异(P = 0.09)。根据个体大小,骨标志点存在很大差异。考虑到这一发现,在翻修手术中,FH不是关节线的可靠导向。先前的研究测量了从各种标志点到关节线的绝对值。本研究具有显著优势,即通过使用比率来考虑性别和尺寸差异,可以为每个个体确定关节线的水平。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验