Mengel Reiner, Behle Marion, Flores-de-Jacoby Lavin
Department of Periodontology, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
J Periodontol. 2007 Dec;78(12):2229-37. doi: 10.1902/jop.2007.070201.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective 10-year study of partially edentulous subjects treated for generalized aggressive periodontitis and periodontally healthy subjects was a clinical, microbiologic, and radiographic comparison of teeth and implants and assessment of the implants' success rate. METHODS: Five subjects treated for generalized aggressive periodontitis (GAgP) and five periodontally healthy subjects who were orally rehabilitated with osseointegrated implants participated in the study. First, they were examined 2 to 4 weeks before extraction of the non-retainable teeth (baseline) and 3 weeks after insertion of the final abutments. All further examinations were performed during a 3-month recall schedule over a 10-year period. At every session, clinical parameters were recorded, and the composition of the subgingival microflora was determined. Radiographs were taken at baseline after insertion of the superstructure and 1, 3, 5, 8, and 10 years later. RESULTS: Throughout the follow-up period, the peri-implant gingival index of GAgP subjects was significantly higher than in periodontally healthy subjects. There was no difference in plaque index between teeth and implants or between the two groups. The peri-implant probing depths were comparable in the two groups and remained < or =4 mm throughout the follow-up. The probing depth was significantly higher around the teeth of the GAgP subjects compared to periodontally healthy subjects. Implants of GAgP subjects showed a significantly higher attachment loss (Ø 2.4 mm). The attachment level at teeth and implants of the periodontally healthy subjects and at teeth of the GAgP subjects was almost unchanged. Microbiologically, GAgP subjects had fewer cocci and more motile rods and filaments at teeth and implants than periodontally healthy subjects. GAgP subjects showed significantly more peri-implant bone loss in the first year (Ø 2.07 mm) and in the subsequent 9 years (total 1.3 mm). Bone loss at teeth also was significantly higher at baseline (Ø 26.39%) and in the following years (total 9.3%). Implant survival rates were 100% in periodontally healthy subjects versus 83.33% in GAgP subjects. CONCLUSIONS: This 10-year study showed that partially edentulous subjects treated for GAgP can be rehabilitated successfully with osseointegrated implants. However, the bone and attachment loss at the implants were higher than in periodontally healthy subjects.
背景:这项针对接受过广泛侵袭性牙周炎治疗的部分牙列缺损患者和牙周健康受试者的前瞻性10年研究,旨在对牙齿和种植体进行临床、微生物学及影像学比较,并评估种植体的成功率。 方法:五名接受过广泛侵袭性牙周炎(GAgP)治疗的患者和五名接受骨结合种植体口腔修复的牙周健康受试者参与了该研究。首先,在拔除无法保留的牙齿前2至4周(基线)以及最终基台植入后3周对他们进行检查。所有后续检查在10年期间按照3个月的复诊计划进行。每次复诊时,记录临床参数,并确定龈下微生物群落的组成。在基线、上部结构植入后、1年、3年、5年、8年和10年后拍摄X线片。 结果:在整个随访期间,GAgP患者的种植体周围牙龈指数显著高于牙周健康受试者。牙齿与种植体之间或两组之间的菌斑指数无差异。两组的种植体周围探诊深度相当,且在整个随访期间均≤4mm。与牙周健康受试者相比,GAgP患者牙齿周围的探诊深度显著更高。GAgP患者的种植体显示出显著更高的附着丧失(平均2.4mm)。牙周健康受试者的牙齿和种植体以及GAgP患者牙齿的附着水平几乎没有变化。在微生物学方面,与牙周健康受试者相比,GAgP患者牙齿和种植体处的球菌较少,活动杆菌和丝状菌较多。GAgP患者在第一年显示出显著更多的种植体周围骨丧失(平均2.07mm),在随后9年中总计为1.3mm。牙齿处的骨丧失在基线时(平均26.39%)和随后几年中(总计9.3%)也显著更高。牙周健康受试者的种植体存活率为100%,而GAgP患者为83.33%。 结论:这项10年研究表明,接受过GAgP治疗的部分牙列缺损患者可以通过骨结合种植体成功修复。然而,种植体处的骨和附着丧失高于牙周健康受试者。
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2007-6
J Periodontol. 2010-11-16
Materials (Basel). 2020-2-7
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2017
Br Dent J. 2016-12-9