Suppr超能文献

离断性胰尾综合征:内镜治疗的潜力及长期随访结果

Disconnected pancreatic tail syndrome: potential for endoscopic therapy and results of long-term follow-up.

作者信息

Lawrence Christopher, Howell Douglas A, Stefan Andreas M, Conklin Donald E, Lukens Frank J, Martin Ronald F, Landes Andrew, Benz Becky

机构信息

Maine Medical Center, Portland, Maine, USA.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Apr;67(4):673-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.07.017. Epub 2007 Dec 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Limited published data exist that address the incidence and outcomes of patients with complete pancreatic-duct disruption.

OBJECTIVE

Report on a single-center experience with this entity that emphasizes the feasibility of endoscopic therapy and long-term outcomes.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis.

SETTING

Tertiary-care medical center (Portland, Maine).

PATIENTS

A total of 189 patients with pancreatic-fluid collections and/or pancreatic fistulas were retrospectively evaluated for the presence of a disconnected pancreatic tail. Patients meeting the definition of disconnected pancreatic tail syndrome (DPTS) with a minimum of 6 months' follow-up were analyzed.

RESULTS

Thirty of 189 patients (16%) met criteria for DPTS. Thirty-six drainage procedures were performed on 29 patients (mean 1.2 procedures per patient). In 22 of 29 patients (76%), the initial drainage procedure was successful. However, recurrent fluid collection(s) developed in 11 of 22 patients (50%) and was seen in those treated surgically and endoscopically. Disruption in the tail (n = 3) was uncommon but invariably required no surgical intervention. The median follow-up was 38 months (range 3-94 months). Diabetes mellitus developed in 16 of 30 patients (53%); 15 of 30 patients (50%) had left-sided portal hypertension; 16 of 30 patients (53%) continue in active medical or surgical follow-up for recurrent symptoms attributable to the disconnected pancreatic tail.

CONCLUSIONS

Of patients with a pancreatic-fluid collection and/or fistula, 16% will also have a disconnected pancreatic tail. Endoscopic and surgical drainage techniques are typically initially successful, but both suffer from a high rate of recurrence in the setting of DPTS. The majority of patients will require long-term follow-up because of complications and/or ongoing symptoms.

摘要

背景

关于完全性胰管中断患者的发病率及预后的已发表数据有限。

目的

报告单中心对此类患者的治疗经验,强调内镜治疗的可行性及长期预后。

设计

回顾性分析。

地点

三级医疗中心(缅因州波特兰)。

患者

对189例有胰液积聚和/或胰瘘的患者进行回顾性评估,以确定是否存在胰尾离断。对符合胰尾离断综合征(DPTS)定义且随访至少6个月的患者进行分析。

结果

189例患者中有30例(16%)符合DPTS标准。对29例患者进行了36次引流手术(平均每位患者1.2次手术)。29例患者中有22例(76%)首次引流手术成功。然而,22例患者中有11例(50%)出现了复发性积液,手术和内镜治疗的患者均有此情况。胰尾离断(n = 3)不常见,但无一例需要手术干预。中位随访时间为38个月(范围3 - 94个月)。30例患者中有16例(53%)发生糖尿病;30例患者中有15例(50%)出现左侧门静脉高压;30例患者中有16例(53%)因胰尾离断导致的复发性症状仍在接受积极的内科或外科随访。

结论

在有胰液积聚和/或胰瘘的患者中,16%也会有胰尾离断。内镜和手术引流技术通常最初是成功的,但在DPTS情况下两者的复发率都很高。由于并发症和/或持续症状,大多数患者需要长期随访。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验