• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Model examination of selective media for isolation of Listeria strains.

作者信息

Domján Kovács H, Ralovich B

机构信息

Laboratory of Veterinary and Food Investigation Institute, Budapest, Hungary.

出版信息

Acta Microbiol Hung. 1991;38(2):141-5.

PMID:1805500
Abstract

During the Tenth International Symposium on Listeriosis (Pécs, Hungary, 1988) the Working Party on Culture Media of IUMS-ICFMH suggested comparative examination of nine enrichment broths and nine solid selective media. On the basis of this proposal the following media were studied: LiCl-phenylethanol-moxalactam agar (LPM), polymyxin-acriflavine-LiCl-ceftazidime-aesculin-mannitol agar (PALCAM) No. 1 (home made) and No. 2 (Merck), acriflavine-ceftazidime agar (AC), Oxford agar, tripaflavine-nalidixic acid serum agar (TNSA) and Forray's agar. The study was performed as described in "Testing methods for use in quality assurance of culture media". Oxford agar proved to be the best medium. LPM, AC and Forray's agars were somewhat more inhibitory than Oxford medium. In productivity TNSA and PALCAM media were weakest but the latter one was more selective. When 43 sausage samples were enriched in UVM broths and subcultured on the above mentioned media the number of positive samples was the same on Oxford, LPM, AC and TNSA agars but it was lower on PALCAM agar No. 1. When 103 milk samples were subcultured on TNSA and PALCAM agar No. 2, the number of positive samples was the same.

摘要

相似文献

1
Model examination of selective media for isolation of Listeria strains.
Acta Microbiol Hung. 1991;38(2):141-5.
2
[The diagnosis of Listeria encephalitis in ruminants using cultural and immunohistological techniques. I. Comparison of different selective media and culture techniques for the detection of Listeria from ruminant brains].
Zentralbl Veterinarmed B. 1992 Aug;39(6):410-20.
3
Evaluation of enrichment and plating media for isolating Listeria monocytogenes.用于分离单核细胞增生李斯特菌的增菌和接种培养基的评估
J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1988 May-Jun;71(3):664-8.
4
Atypical colonial morphology and low recoveries of Listeria monocytogenes strains on Oxford, PALCAM, Rapid'L.mono and ALOA solid media.单核细胞增生李斯特菌菌株在牛津培养基、PALCAM培养基、Rapid'L.mono培养基和ALOA固体培养基上呈现非典型菌落形态且回收率低。
J Microbiol Methods. 2004 May;57(2):251-8. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2004.01.011.
5
Comparison of different selective methods for detection of Listeria species in surface water.不同选择性方法用于检测地表水中李斯特菌属的比较。
Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed. 1995 Dec;198(2):124-37.
6
Comparison of seven plating media for enumeration of Listeria spp.用于李斯特菌属计数的七种平板培养基的比较
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988 Dec;54(12):3003-7. doi: 10.1128/aem.54.12.3003-3007.1988.
7
[Presence of Listeria monocytogenes and Listeria sp. in fresh and cured sausages. Use of different conditions of time and temperature for incubation].[新鲜和腌制香肠中单核细胞增生李斯特菌和李斯特菌属的存在。采用不同时间和温度条件进行培养]
Zentralbl Veterinarmed B. 1997 Dec;44(10):617-24.
8
Evaluation of BBL CHROMagar Listeria agar for the isolation and identification of Listeria monocytogenes from food and environmental samples.评估BBL CHROMagar李斯特菌琼脂用于从食品和环境样本中分离和鉴定单核细胞增生李斯特菌的效果。
J Microbiol Methods. 2007 Jan;68(1):82-7. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2006.06.011. Epub 2006 Aug 23.
9
Liquid and solid selective differential media for the detection and enumeration of L. monocytogenes and other Listeria spp.用于检测和计数单核细胞增生李斯特菌及其他李斯特菌属的液体和固体选择性鉴别培养基
Int J Food Microbiol. 1989 Jul;8(4):299-316. doi: 10.1016/0168-1605(89)90001-9.
10
Hypovirulent Listeria monocytogenes strains are less frequently recovered than virulent strains on PALCAM and Rapid' L. mono media.在PALCAM培养基和Rapid' L. mono培养基上,低毒力单核细胞增生李斯特菌菌株的分离频率低于强毒力菌株。
Int J Food Microbiol. 2003 Jun 15;83(2):133-45. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1605(02)00321-5.