Loessner M J, Bell R H, Jay J M, Shelef L A
Department of Biological Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48202.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988 Dec;54(12):3003-7. doi: 10.1128/aem.54.12.3003-3007.1988.
The suitability of seven media for the enumeration of Listeria spp. was evaluated at 30 degrees C for 48 h. The media tested were (i) the original McBride Listeria agar formulation (with glycine); (ii) modified McBride agar containing glycine anhydride; (iii) LiCl-phenylethanol-moxalactam (LPM) agar; (iv) acriflavine-ceftazidime agar; (v) Rodriguez isolation agar (RISA); (vi) modified Vogel-Johnson (MVJ) agar; (vii) cyclohexanedione-nalidixic acid-phenylethanol agar; and tryptose agar as control. A total of 66 organisms were used including 11 Listeria monocytogenes strains and 5 other Listeria spp. For L. monocytogenes strains only, all media performed highly similarly. Of the other Listeria spp., only two grew on MVJ agar and three each grew on LPM and RISA. Only LPM agar inhibited the 50 non-listeriae, including five yeasts, while MVJ agar inhibited all but one yeast. The McBride Listeria agar formulation that contained glycine anhydride was less selective than the original. When pure cultures of 10 bacteria (including one L. monocytogenes strain) were combined and plated on four media, L. monocytogenes colonies were easiest to enumerate on MVJ agar, followed by LPM and RISA. These media ranked in the same order when plated with homogenates of various foods to which was added L. monocytogenes Scott A, but LPM agar was the best overall since Scott A was inhibited by MVJ. Upon microscopic examination of listerial colonies from the plating media, atypical cell morphology was noted with cells being about twofold in size on LPM, MVJ, and acriflavine-ceftazidime agars. Overall, LPM agar was the most suitable of the media tested even though it was inhibitory to Listeria grayi and Listeria murrayi.
在30℃下培养48小时,评估了七种培养基用于李斯特菌属计数的适用性。所测试的培养基包括:(i)原始的含甘氨酸的麦克布赖德李斯特菌琼脂配方;(ii)含甘氨酸酐的改良麦克布赖德琼脂;(iii)氯化锂-苯乙醇-莫西拉坦(LPM)琼脂;(iv)吖啶黄-头孢他啶琼脂;(v)罗德里格斯分离琼脂(RISA);(vi)改良的沃格尔-约翰逊(MVJ)琼脂;(vii)环己二酮-萘啶酸-苯乙醇琼脂;以及作为对照的胰蛋白胨琼脂。总共使用了66株菌,包括11株单核细胞增生李斯特菌菌株和5株其他李斯特菌属菌株。仅对于单核细胞增生李斯特菌菌株而言,所有培养基的表现高度相似。在其他李斯特菌属菌株中,只有两株能在MVJ琼脂上生长,三株能在LPM琼脂和RISA琼脂上生长。只有LPM琼脂能抑制50株非李斯特菌,包括五株酵母菌,而MVJ琼脂除了一株酵母菌外抑制了所有酵母菌。含有甘氨酸酐的麦克布赖德李斯特菌琼脂配方的选择性低于原始配方。当将10种细菌的纯培养物(包括一株单核细胞增生李斯特菌菌株)混合并接种在四种培养基上时,在MVJ琼脂上最容易计数到单核细胞增生李斯特菌菌落,其次是LPM琼脂和RISA琼脂。当接种添加了单核细胞增生李斯特菌斯科特A的各种食品匀浆时,这些培养基的排名顺序相同,但LPM琼脂总体上是最好的,因为斯科特A被MVJ琼脂抑制。在显微镜下检查平板培养基上的李斯特菌菌落时,发现LPM琼脂、MVJ琼脂和吖啶黄-头孢他啶琼脂上的细胞形态不典型,细胞大小约为正常的两倍。总体而言,LPM琼脂是所测试的培养基中最适合的,尽管它对格氏李斯特菌和默氏李斯特菌有抑制作用。