• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初级保健组织框架:结构领域的重要性

Framework for primary care organizations: the importance of a structural domain.

作者信息

Hogg William, Rowan Margo, Russell Grant, Geneau Robert, Muldoon Laura

机构信息

C.T. Lamont Primary Health Care Research Centre, Elisabeth Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Qual Health Care. 2008 Oct;20(5):308-13. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm054. Epub 2007 Nov 30.

DOI:10.1093/intqhc/mzm054
PMID:18055502
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2533520/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Conceptual frameworks for primary care have evolved over the last 40 years, yet little attention has been paid to the environmental, structural and organizational factors that facilitate or moderate service delivery. Since primary care is now of more interest to policy makers, it is important that they have a comprehensive and balanced conceptual framework to facilitate their understanding and appreciation. We present a conceptual framework for primary care originally developed to guide the measurement of the performance of primary care organizations within the context of a large mixed-method evaluation of four types of models of primary care in Ontario, Canada.

METHODS

The framework was developed following an iterative process that combined expert consultation and group meetings with a narrative review of existing frameworks, as well as trends in health management and organizational theory.

RESULTS

Our conceptual framework for primary care has two domains: structural and performance. The structural domain describes the health care system, practice context and organization of the practice in which any primary care organization operates. The performance domain includes features of health care service delivery and technical quality of clinical care.

CONCLUSION

As primary care evolves through demonstration projects and reformed delivery models, it is important to evaluate its structural and organizational features as these are likely to have a significant impact on performance.

摘要

目的

在过去40年里,初级保健的概念框架不断演变,但对于促进或调节服务提供的环境、结构和组织因素却很少有人关注。由于初级保健目前受到政策制定者的更多关注,因此他们拥有一个全面且平衡的概念框架以促进其理解和认识就显得很重要。我们提出了一个初级保健概念框架,该框架最初是在对加拿大安大略省四种初级保健模式进行大规模混合方法评估的背景下,为指导初级保健组织绩效的衡量而制定的。

方法

该框架是通过一个迭代过程制定的,该过程将专家咨询和小组会议与对现有框架的叙述性回顾以及健康管理和组织理论的趋势相结合。

结果

我们的初级保健概念框架有两个领域:结构和绩效。结构领域描述了任何初级保健组织运作所处的医疗保健系统、实践背景和实践组织。绩效领域包括医疗保健服务提供的特征和临床护理的技术质量。

结论

随着初级保健通过示范项目和改革后的服务提供模式不断发展,评估其结构和组织特征很重要,因为这些特征可能对绩效产生重大影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57f7/2639593/4ceff1ddad60/mzm05401.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57f7/2639593/4ceff1ddad60/mzm05401.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57f7/2639593/4ceff1ddad60/mzm05401.jpg

相似文献

1
Framework for primary care organizations: the importance of a structural domain.初级保健组织框架:结构领域的重要性
Int J Qual Health Care. 2008 Oct;20(5):308-13. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm054. Epub 2007 Nov 30.
2
A conceptual framework for the OECD Health Care Quality Indicators Project.经合组织医疗保健质量指标项目的概念框架。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2006 Sep;18 Suppl 1:5-13. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzl024.
3
Framework for advancing improvement in primary care.推进初级保健改善的框架
Healthc Pap. 2012;12(2):8-21. doi: 10.12927/hcpap.2012.22978.
4
A conceptual framework for the analysis of health care organizations' performance.用于分析医疗保健组织绩效的概念框架。
Health Serv Manage Res. 1998 Feb;11(1):24-41; discussion 41-8. doi: 10.1177/095148489801100106.
5
Health sector reform and public sector health worker motivation: a conceptual framework.卫生部门改革与公共部门卫生工作者激励:一个概念框架
Soc Sci Med. 2002 Apr;54(8):1255-66. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(01)00094-6.
6
Developing interdisciplinary maternity services policy in Canada. Evaluation of a consensus workshop.在加拿大制定跨学科孕产服务政策。共识研讨会评估。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2010 Feb;16(1):238-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01326.x.
7
Patient-centered innovation in health care organizations: a conceptual framework and case study application.以患者为中心的医疗组织创新:概念框架与案例研究应用。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2013 Apr-Jun;38(2):166-75. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0b013e31825e718a.
8
Implementation of evidence-based practice and organizational performance.循证实践的实施与组织绩效。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2010 Jan;37(1):79-94. doi: 10.1007/s11414-008-9154-y. Epub 2008 Dec 16.
9
Development of a framework for effective community engagement in Ontario, Canada.制定安大略省(加拿大)有效的社区参与框架。
Health Policy. 2011 Jun;101(1):59-69. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.08.024. Epub 2010 Sep 22.
10
Enhancing learning, innovation, adaptation, and sustainability in health care organizations: the ELIAS performance management framework.提升医疗保健组织的学习、创新、适应能力及可持续性:伊莱亚斯绩效管理框架
Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2014 Jul-Sep;33(3):183-204. doi: 10.1097/HCM.0000000000000014.

引用本文的文献

1
Community detection and management of mild cognitive impairment in Shanghai: a mixed-methods study.上海轻度认知障碍的社区检测与管理:一项混合方法研究。
Health Policy Plan. 2025 Jun 12;40(6):613-624. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaf025.
2
Comprehensiveness in Primary Care: A Scoping Review.基层医疗中的全面性:一项范围综述
Milbank Q. 2025 Mar;103(1):153-204. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12723. Epub 2024 Dec 13.
3
'It's what we should be doing anyway': using financial incentives to promote relational continuity in Australian General Practice-a nested case study analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Operational definitions of attributes of primary health care: consensus among Canadian experts.初级卫生保健属性的操作定义:加拿大专家达成的共识
Ann Fam Med. 2007 Jul-Aug;5(4):336-44. doi: 10.1370/afm.682.
2
Beyond the initial indicators: lessons from the OECD Health Care Quality Indicators Project and the US National Healthcare Quality Report.超越初始指标:经合组织医疗保健质量指标项目及美国国家医疗保健质量报告的经验教训
Int J Qual Health Care. 2006 Sep;18 Suppl 1:45-51. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzl027.
3
Influence of primary care practice and provider attributes on preventive service delivery.
“这本来就是我们应该做的事”:利用经济激励措施促进澳大利亚全科医疗中的关系连续性——一项嵌套式案例研究分析
Fam Pract. 2025 Jan 17;42(1). doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmae071.
4
Older people's challenges accessing health services in central Nepal: a qualitative study using the domain of access framework.尼泊尔中部老年人获取卫生服务的挑战:利用获取领域框架的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 23;24(1):1273. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11717-2.
5
General practitioners in front of COVID-19: Italy in European comparative perspective.新冠疫情下的全科医生:从欧洲比较视角看意大利
Front Sociol. 2024 May 23;9:1365517. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1365517. eCollection 2024.
6
Access to primary health care: perspectives of primary care physicians and community stakeholders.初级卫生保健的可及性:初级保健医生和社区利益相关者的观点。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 May 6;25(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02312-9.
7
Nurturing an organizational context that supports team-based primary mental health care: A grounded theory study.培育支持基于团队的初级精神卫生保健的组织环境:扎根理论研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 30;19(4):e0301796. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301796. eCollection 2024.
8
Protocol for Establishing a Stakeholder Group for Primary Care Research into Cancer Using a Modified 7P Framework and an e-Delphi Process.使用改良的7P框架和电子德尔菲法建立癌症初级保健研究利益相关者小组的方案
HRB Open Res. 2023 Dec 19;6:53. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13750.2. eCollection 2023.
9
Factors facilitating the implementation of a clinical decision support system in primary care practices: a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis.促进临床决策支持系统在初级保健实践中实施的因素:模糊集定性比较分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct 26;23(1):1161. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10156-9.
10
Organization of primary care.基层医疗组织。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2022 Sep 1;23:e49. doi: 10.1017/S1463423622000275.
基层医疗实践和提供者属性对预防性服务提供的影响。
Am J Prev Med. 2006 May;30(5):413-22. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.12.012.
4
Determinants of primary medical care quality measured under the new UK contract: cross sectional study.根据英国新合同衡量的基层医疗服务质量的决定因素:横断面研究
BMJ. 2006 Feb 18;332(7538):389-90. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38742.554468.55. Epub 2006 Feb 8.
5
The significance of a collaborative practice model in delivering care to chronically ill patients: a case study of managing diabetes mellitus in a primary health care center.协作实践模式在为慢性病患者提供护理中的意义:以初级卫生保健中心管理糖尿病为例的案例研究
J Interprof Care. 2005 Oct;19(5):444-51. doi: 10.1080/13561820500215095.
6
Evaluating the quality of medical care. 1966.评估医疗质量。1966年。
Milbank Q. 2005;83(4):691-729. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00397.x.
7
Measuring the culture of medical group practices.衡量医疗集团业务的文化。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2005 Jul-Sep;30(3):184-93. doi: 10.1097/00004010-200507000-00002.
8
The influence of the structure and culture of medical group practices on prescription drug errors.医疗集团执业的结构和文化对处方药错误的影响。
Med Care. 2005 Aug;43(8):817-25. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000170419.70346.b8.
9
Managed care, physician job satisfaction, and the quality of primary care.管理式医疗、医生工作满意度与初级医疗质量
J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Mar;20(3):271-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.32127.x.
10
Interpersonal continuity of care and care outcomes: a critical review.人际连续性护理与护理结果:一项批判性综述。
Ann Fam Med. 2005 Mar-Apr;3(2):159-66. doi: 10.1370/afm.285.