Underwood Karen, Rubin Sarah, Deakers Timothy, Newth Christopher
Division of Critical Care, Childrens Hospital Los Angeles, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90027, USA.
Pediatrics. 2007 Dec;120(6):e1380-5. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-3276.
To report a tertiary care hospital's 30-year experience with the diagnosis, treatment, and outcome of infant botulism in the PICU before and after the availability of Botulism Immune Globulin Intravenous.
This was a retrospective medical chart review of the 67 patients who had received a diagnosis of infant botulism and were admitted to the ICU from 1976 to 2005. The ages on presentation, length of hospital stay, length of ICU stay, length of mechanical ventilation, and type of botulism toxin were recorded and compared for patients who had received Botulism Immune Globulin Intravenous and those who had not. On the basis of our results, conclusions were drawn regarding the effect of Botulism Immune Globulin Intravenous on the morbidity of infant botulism.
Sixty-seven patients' charts were reviewed; 23 male and 29 female patients did not receive Botulism Immune Globulin Intravenous. Of patients who did not receive Botulism Immune Globulin Intravenous, the median age at presentation was 71 days, median length of hospital stay was 35 days, ICU stay was 24 days, and duration of mechanical ventilation was 17 days. A total of 40% had type A toxin, and 60% had type B toxin. There was a significant difference between patients with toxin types A and B in length of hospital stay but not length of ICU stay or mechanical ventilation. Patients with type A toxin were significantly older than patients with type B toxin. Fifteen children received Botulism Immune Globulin Intravenous. There were statistically significant differences in length of hospital stay, length of ICU stay, and length of mechanical ventilation between patients who received Botulism Immune Globulin Intravenous and those who did not.
The use of Botulism Immune Globulin Intravenous significantly decreased the length of ICU stay, length of mechanical ventilation, and overall hospital stay in children with infant botulism.
报告一家三级护理医院在可获得静脉注射肉毒杆菌免疫球蛋白前后30年里在儿科重症监护病房(PICU)对婴儿肉毒中毒的诊断、治疗及转归情况。
对1976年至2005年期间确诊为婴儿肉毒中毒并入住重症监护病房的67例患者进行回顾性病历审查。记录并比较接受静脉注射肉毒杆菌免疫球蛋白和未接受该治疗的患者的就诊年龄、住院时间、重症监护病房停留时间、机械通气时间以及肉毒杆菌毒素类型。根据研究结果,得出关于静脉注射肉毒杆菌免疫球蛋白对婴儿肉毒中毒发病率影响的结论。
审查了67例患者的病历;23例男性和29例女性患者未接受静脉注射肉毒杆菌免疫球蛋白。未接受静脉注射肉毒杆菌免疫球蛋白的患者中,就诊时的中位年龄为71天,中位住院时间为35天,重症监护病房停留时间为24天,机械通气时间为17天。共有40%的患者为A型毒素,60%为B型毒素。毒素类型A和B的患者在住院时间上存在显著差异,但在重症监护病房停留时间或机械通气时间上无显著差异。A型毒素患者的年龄显著大于B型毒素患者。15名儿童接受了静脉注射肉毒杆菌免疫球蛋白。接受静脉注射肉毒杆菌免疫球蛋白和未接受该治疗的患者在住院时间、重症监护病房停留时间和机械通气时间上存在统计学显著差异。
静脉注射肉毒杆菌免疫球蛋白显著缩短了婴儿肉毒中毒患儿的重症监护病房停留时间及机械通气时间和总体住院时间。