Suppr超能文献

一种针对重症创伤患者的镇痛 - 谵妄 - 镇静方案可减少呼吸机使用天数和住院时间。

An analgesia-delirium-sedation protocol for critically ill trauma patients reduces ventilator days and hospital length of stay.

作者信息

Robinson Bryce R H, Mueller Eric W, Henson Kathyrn, Branson Richard D, Barsoum Samuel, Tsuei Betty J

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, 231 Albert Sabin Way, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0558, USA. bryce.robinson@.uc.edu

出版信息

J Trauma. 2008 Sep;65(3):517-26. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318181b8f6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Analgesics and sedatives are required to maintain a calm and comfortable mechanically ventilated injured patient. Continuous sedative infusions have been shown to lengthen mechanical ventilation and hospital length of stay. Daily interruption of sedative infusions may reduce both of these variables. Implementation of an Analgesia-Delirium-Sedation (ADS) Protocol using objective assessments with a goal of maintaining an awake and comfortable patient may obviate the need for daily interruption of infusions in critically ill trauma patients. We examined the effects of such a protocol on ventilator duration, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, hospital slength of stay, and medication requirements.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary team designed the protocol. Objective measures of pain (visual/objective pain assessment scale-VAS/OPAS), agitation (Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale-RASS), and delirium [Confusion Assessment Method {CAM-ICU}] were used. Medications were titrated to a RASS of -1 to +1 and VAS/OPAS <4. Haloperidol was used to treat delirium in CAM-ICU positive patients. Retrospective review of the local Project IMPACT database for a 6-month period in 2004 was compared with the same seasonal period in 2006 in which the ADS protocol was used. All mechanically ventilated trauma patients receiving infusions of narcotic, propofol, or benzodiazepine were included. Age, APACHE II score, Injury Severity Score, ventilator days, ventilator-free days at day 28, ICU length of stay, and hospital length of stay are reported as median values (interquartile range). Medication usage is reported as mean values (+/-SD). Differences in data were analyzed using Wilcoxon's rank-sum test or t test, as appropriate. Gender, mortality, and mechanism of injury were analyzed using chi analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 143 patients were included. Patients who died during their hospitalization were excluded except in the analysis of ventilator-free days at day 28. After exclusions, 61 patients were in the control group and 58 in the protocol group. The median duration of mechanical ventilation in the protocol group was 1.2 days (0.5-3.0) which was significantly reduced compared with 3.2 days (1.0-12.9) in the control group (p = 0.027). Analysis of ventilator-free days at day 28 found that the protocol group had 26.4 ventilator-free days (13.9-27.4) compared with 22.8 days (10.5-26.9) in the control group (p = 0.007). The median ICU length of stay was 5.9 days (2.3-18.2) in the control group and 4.1 days (2.5-8.3) in the protocol group (p = 0.21). Hospital length of stay was 12 days (7-17) in the protocol group in contrast to 18 days (10-27) in the control group (p = 0.036). Opiate equivalents and propofol use per patient was significantly reduced in the protocol group from 2,465 mg (+/-1,242 mg) to 1,641 mg (+/-1,250 mg) and 19,232 mg (+/-22,477 mg) to 10,057 (+/-14,616 mg), respectively (p < 0.001, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

An objective assessment- based ADS protocol without daily interruption of medication infusion decreases ventilator days and hospital length of stay in critically ill trauma patients.

摘要

背景

需要使用镇痛药和镇静剂来维持机械通气的受伤患者的平静与舒适。持续输注镇静剂已被证明会延长机械通气时间和住院时间。每日中断镇静剂输注可能会减少这两个变量。实施镇痛-谵妄-镇静(ADS)方案,通过客观评估以维持患者清醒和舒适,可能无需对重症创伤患者每日中断输注。我们研究了该方案对机械通气时间、重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间、住院时间和药物需求的影响。

方法

一个多学科团队设计了该方案。使用疼痛的客观测量方法(视觉/客观疼痛评估量表-VAS/OPAS)、躁动(里士满躁动-镇静量表-RASS)和谵妄[意识模糊评估方法{CAM-ICU}]。将药物滴定至RASS为-1至+1且VAS/OPAS<4。使用氟哌啶醇治疗CAM-ICU阳性患者的谵妄。对2004年6个月期间本地“影响项目”数据库进行回顾性分析,并与2006年使用ADS方案的同一季节进行比较。纳入所有接受麻醉药、丙泊酚或苯二氮䓬输注的机械通气创伤患者。年龄、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)评分、损伤严重程度评分、机械通气天数、第28天无机械通气天数、ICU住院时间和住院时间以中位数(四分位间距)报告。药物使用情况以平均值(±标准差)报告。根据情况使用Wilcoxon秩和检验或t检验分析数据差异。使用卡方分析分析性别、死亡率和损伤机制。

结果

共纳入143例患者。住院期间死亡的患者被排除,但在分析第28天的无机械通气天数时除外。排除后,对照组有61例患者,方案组有58例患者。方案组机械通气的中位时间为1.2天(0.5 - 3.0天),与对照组的3.2天(1.0 - 12.9天)相比显著缩短(p = 0.027)。对第28天的无机械通气天数分析发现,方案组有26.4天无机械通气(13.9 - 27.4天),而对照组为22.8天(10.5 - 26.9天)(p = 0.007)。对照组ICU住院时间的中位数为5.9天(2.3 - 18.2天),方案组为4.1天(2.5 - 8.3天)(p = 0.21)。方案组的住院时间为12天(7 - 17天),而对照组为18天(10 - 27天)(p = 0.036)。方案组每位患者的阿片类等效物和丙泊酚使用量分别从2465毫克(±1242毫克)显著降至1641毫克(±1250毫克)和从19232毫克(±22477毫克)降至10057毫克(±14616毫克)(p < 0.001,p = 0.01)。

结论

基于客观评估的ADS方案,无需每日中断药物输注,可减少重症创伤患者的机械通气天数和住院时间。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验