• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种针对重症创伤患者的镇痛 - 谵妄 - 镇静方案可减少呼吸机使用天数和住院时间。

An analgesia-delirium-sedation protocol for critically ill trauma patients reduces ventilator days and hospital length of stay.

作者信息

Robinson Bryce R H, Mueller Eric W, Henson Kathyrn, Branson Richard D, Barsoum Samuel, Tsuei Betty J

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, 231 Albert Sabin Way, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0558, USA. bryce.robinson@.uc.edu

出版信息

J Trauma. 2008 Sep;65(3):517-26. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318181b8f6.

DOI:10.1097/TA.0b013e318181b8f6
PMID:18784563
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Analgesics and sedatives are required to maintain a calm and comfortable mechanically ventilated injured patient. Continuous sedative infusions have been shown to lengthen mechanical ventilation and hospital length of stay. Daily interruption of sedative infusions may reduce both of these variables. Implementation of an Analgesia-Delirium-Sedation (ADS) Protocol using objective assessments with a goal of maintaining an awake and comfortable patient may obviate the need for daily interruption of infusions in critically ill trauma patients. We examined the effects of such a protocol on ventilator duration, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, hospital slength of stay, and medication requirements.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary team designed the protocol. Objective measures of pain (visual/objective pain assessment scale-VAS/OPAS), agitation (Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale-RASS), and delirium [Confusion Assessment Method {CAM-ICU}] were used. Medications were titrated to a RASS of -1 to +1 and VAS/OPAS <4. Haloperidol was used to treat delirium in CAM-ICU positive patients. Retrospective review of the local Project IMPACT database for a 6-month period in 2004 was compared with the same seasonal period in 2006 in which the ADS protocol was used. All mechanically ventilated trauma patients receiving infusions of narcotic, propofol, or benzodiazepine were included. Age, APACHE II score, Injury Severity Score, ventilator days, ventilator-free days at day 28, ICU length of stay, and hospital length of stay are reported as median values (interquartile range). Medication usage is reported as mean values (+/-SD). Differences in data were analyzed using Wilcoxon's rank-sum test or t test, as appropriate. Gender, mortality, and mechanism of injury were analyzed using chi analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 143 patients were included. Patients who died during their hospitalization were excluded except in the analysis of ventilator-free days at day 28. After exclusions, 61 patients were in the control group and 58 in the protocol group. The median duration of mechanical ventilation in the protocol group was 1.2 days (0.5-3.0) which was significantly reduced compared with 3.2 days (1.0-12.9) in the control group (p = 0.027). Analysis of ventilator-free days at day 28 found that the protocol group had 26.4 ventilator-free days (13.9-27.4) compared with 22.8 days (10.5-26.9) in the control group (p = 0.007). The median ICU length of stay was 5.9 days (2.3-18.2) in the control group and 4.1 days (2.5-8.3) in the protocol group (p = 0.21). Hospital length of stay was 12 days (7-17) in the protocol group in contrast to 18 days (10-27) in the control group (p = 0.036). Opiate equivalents and propofol use per patient was significantly reduced in the protocol group from 2,465 mg (+/-1,242 mg) to 1,641 mg (+/-1,250 mg) and 19,232 mg (+/-22,477 mg) to 10,057 (+/-14,616 mg), respectively (p < 0.001, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

An objective assessment- based ADS protocol without daily interruption of medication infusion decreases ventilator days and hospital length of stay in critically ill trauma patients.

摘要

背景

需要使用镇痛药和镇静剂来维持机械通气的受伤患者的平静与舒适。持续输注镇静剂已被证明会延长机械通气时间和住院时间。每日中断镇静剂输注可能会减少这两个变量。实施镇痛-谵妄-镇静(ADS)方案,通过客观评估以维持患者清醒和舒适,可能无需对重症创伤患者每日中断输注。我们研究了该方案对机械通气时间、重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间、住院时间和药物需求的影响。

方法

一个多学科团队设计了该方案。使用疼痛的客观测量方法(视觉/客观疼痛评估量表-VAS/OPAS)、躁动(里士满躁动-镇静量表-RASS)和谵妄[意识模糊评估方法{CAM-ICU}]。将药物滴定至RASS为-1至+1且VAS/OPAS<4。使用氟哌啶醇治疗CAM-ICU阳性患者的谵妄。对2004年6个月期间本地“影响项目”数据库进行回顾性分析,并与2006年使用ADS方案的同一季节进行比较。纳入所有接受麻醉药、丙泊酚或苯二氮䓬输注的机械通气创伤患者。年龄、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)评分、损伤严重程度评分、机械通气天数、第28天无机械通气天数、ICU住院时间和住院时间以中位数(四分位间距)报告。药物使用情况以平均值(±标准差)报告。根据情况使用Wilcoxon秩和检验或t检验分析数据差异。使用卡方分析分析性别、死亡率和损伤机制。

结果

共纳入143例患者。住院期间死亡的患者被排除,但在分析第28天的无机械通气天数时除外。排除后,对照组有61例患者,方案组有58例患者。方案组机械通气的中位时间为1.2天(0.5 - 3.0天),与对照组的3.2天(1.0 - 12.9天)相比显著缩短(p = 0.027)。对第28天的无机械通气天数分析发现,方案组有26.4天无机械通气(13.9 - 27.4天),而对照组为22.8天(10.5 - 26.9天)(p = 0.007)。对照组ICU住院时间的中位数为5.9天(2.3 - 18.2天),方案组为4.1天(2.5 - 8.3天)(p = 0.21)。方案组的住院时间为12天(7 - 17天),而对照组为18天(10 - 27天)(p = 0.036)。方案组每位患者的阿片类等效物和丙泊酚使用量分别从2465毫克(±1242毫克)显著降至1641毫克(±1250毫克)和从19232毫克(±22477毫克)降至10057毫克(±14616毫克)(p < 0.001,p = 0.01)。

结论

基于客观评估的ADS方案,无需每日中断药物输注,可减少重症创伤患者的机械通气天数和住院时间。

相似文献

1
An analgesia-delirium-sedation protocol for critically ill trauma patients reduces ventilator days and hospital length of stay.一种针对重症创伤患者的镇痛 - 谵妄 - 镇静方案可减少呼吸机使用天数和住院时间。
J Trauma. 2008 Sep;65(3):517-26. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318181b8f6.
2
I-SAVE study: impact of sedation, analgesia, and delirium protocols evaluated in the intensive care unit: an economic evaluation.I-SAVE 研究:在重症监护病房评估镇静、镇痛和谵妄方案的影响:一项经济评价。
Ann Pharmacother. 2012 Jan;46(1):21-8. doi: 10.1345/aph.1Q284. Epub 2011 Dec 27.
3
Clinical sedation scores as indicators of sedative and analgesic drug exposure in intensive care unit patients.临床镇静评分作为重症监护病房患者镇静和镇痛药物暴露的指标。
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2007 Sep;5(3):218-31. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2007.10.005.
4
Sedation in the ICU.重症监护病房中的镇静
Dan Med J. 2012 May;59(5):B4458.
5
A randomized trial of intermittent lorazepam versus propofol with daily interruption in mechanically ventilated patients.机械通气患者中间歇性使用劳拉西泮与丙泊酚并每日中断用药的随机试验。
Crit Care Med. 2006 May;34(5):1326-32. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000215513.63207.7F.
6
Impact of a clinical pharmacist-enforced intensive care unit sedation protocol on duration of mechanical ventilation and hospital stay.临床药师实施的重症监护病房镇静方案对机械通气时间和住院时间的影响。
Crit Care Med. 2008 Feb;36(2):427-33. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000300275.63811.B3.
7
Pain assessment is associated with decreased duration of mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit: a post Hoc analysis of the DOLOREA study.疼痛评估与重症监护病房机械通气时间缩短相关:DOLOREA研究的事后分析
Anesthesiology. 2009 Dec;111(6):1308-16. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181c0d4f0.
8
Evaluation of dexmedetomidine: safety and clinical outcomes in critically ill trauma patients.右美托咪定的评估:重症创伤患者的安全性和临床结局
J Trauma. 2011 Nov;71(5):1164-71. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182147670.
9
Randomized controlled trial of interrupted versus continuous sedative infusions in ventilated children.随机对照试验中断与连续镇静输注在通气儿童。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2012 Mar;13(2):131-5. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e31820aba48.
10
Daily interruption of sedative infusions in critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation.对接受机械通气的重症患者每日中断镇静剂输注。
N Engl J Med. 2000 May 18;342(20):1471-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005183422002.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of a predictive model for patients with post-extubation dysphagia.拔管后吞咽困难患者预测模型的开发与验证
World J Emerg Med. 2023;14(1):49-55. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2023.021.
2
Gabapentin as Add-On to Fentanyl and Midazolam in Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation: A Randomized, Blinded Study.加巴喷丁用于接受机械通气患者的芬太尼和咪达唑仑辅助治疗:一项随机、双盲研究。
Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2022 Apr;50(2):101-106. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2022.21366.
3
Impact of a Multimodal Analgesia Protocol in an Intensive Care Unit: A Pre-post Cohort Study.
多模式镇痛方案在重症监护病房的影响:一项前后队列研究。
Cureus. 2022 Mar 3;14(3):e22786. doi: 10.7759/cureus.22786. eCollection 2022 Mar.
4
The Effect of Sedation Protocol on Sedation Level and Pharmacological and Non-Pharmacological Interventions on Mechanically Ventilated Patients.镇静方案对机械通气患者镇静水平以及药物和非药物干预措施的影响
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2021 Jul 20;26(4):316-323. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_165_20. eCollection 2021 Jul-Aug.
5
The effect of using Richmond agitation and sedation scale on hospital stay, ventilator dependence, and mortality rate in ICU inpatients: a randomised clinical trial.使用里士满躁动镇静量表对重症监护病房住院患者住院时间、呼吸机依赖及死亡率的影响:一项随机临床试验
J Res Nurs. 2020 Dec;25(8):734-746. doi: 10.1177/1744987120943921. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
6
Comparison of two behavioural pain scales for the assessment of procedural pain: A systematic review.两种行为疼痛量表评估操作痛的比较:系统评价。
Nurs Open. 2021 Sep;8(5):2050-2060. doi: 10.1002/nop2.714. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
7
A Multidisciplinary Pain, Agitation, and Delirium Management Team Can Promote Rehabilitation in the Intensive Care Unit: A Case Report.多学科疼痛、躁动和谵妄管理团队可促进重症监护病房的康复:一例报告
Prog Rehabil Med. 2016 Dec 22;1:20160010. doi: 10.2490/prm.20160010. eCollection 2016.
8
Evaluation of a Multidisciplinary Pain, Agitation, and Delirium Guideline in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Adults.对机械通气的成年危重症患者多学科疼痛、躁动及谵妄指南的评估
Hosp Pharm. 2019 Apr;54(2):119-124. doi: 10.1177/0018578718769570. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
9
Comparison of Two Pain Scales: Behavioral Pain Scale and Critical-care Pain Observation Tool During Invasive and Noninvasive Procedures in Intensive Care Unit-admitted Patients.两种疼痛量表的比较:行为疼痛量表与重症监护疼痛观察工具在重症监护病房收治患者的侵入性和非侵入性操作中的应用
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2019 Mar-Apr;24(2):151-155. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_47_18.
10
Risk scores for predicting dysphagia in critically ill patients after cardiac surgery.心脏手术后危重症患者发生吞咽困难的风险评分。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Jan 10;19(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0680-3.