Biomechanical effects of kneeling after total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND

Kneeling following total knee arthroplasty can be a difficult task, impairing the activities of patients to varying degrees. Little is known about the biomechanical effects of kneeling following total knee replacement. The objective of this study was to quantify the effects of kneeling on patellofemoral joint contact areas and pressures, knee joint reaction force, and patellar kinematics.

METHODS

Total knee arthroplasties were performed on eight fresh-frozen cadaveric knees, and they were tested with use of a custom knee jig, which permits the simulation of physiologic quadriceps loading as well as the application of an anterior force to simulate kneeling. The knees were tested at flexion angles of 90 degrees , 105 degrees , 120 degrees , and 135 degrees with no anterior force (mimicking a squatting position) and with an anterior force application simulating double-stance kneeling and single-stance kneeling. Patellofemoral joint contact areas and pressures were measured with pressure-sensitive film, and the knee joint reaction force was measured with use of a six-degree-of-freedom load cell. Patellar kinematics were assessed with use of digital photographs tracking fixed markers on the patella.

RESULTS

Compared with the condition without kneeling, both single-stance and double-stance kneeling demonstrated significant increases in patellofemoral contact area (p < 0.05) and pressure at all flexion angles (p < 0.05), with the exception of double-stance kneeling at 135 degrees of flexion. The resultant knee joint -reaction force increased with kneeling at all flexion angles. The compressive component of this force increased with kneeling for most conditions, while the lateral component of this force decreased significantly (p < 0.05) with kneeling only at 90 degrees , and the anterior component of this force increased significantly at all knee flexion angles (p < 0.05). Overall, kneeling had minimal changes on patellar tilt, with significant changes in patellar tilt seen only with kneeling at 120 degrees (p = 0.02 for double stance, and p = 0.03 for single stance).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study suggest that kneeling at a higher flexion angle (135 degrees ) after total knee arthroplasty has a smaller effect on patellofemoral joint contact area and pressure than kneeling at lower flexion angles (<or=120 degrees ).