Brothers Kyle B, Glascoe Frances Page, Robertshaw Nicholas S
Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2008 Apr;47(3):271-9. doi: 10.1177/0009922807309419. Epub 2007 Dec 5.
About 16% of children have developmental-behavioral disabilities but less than one-third of the children are detected by their health care providers, probably because of the use of informal milestones checklists. The goal of this study is to determine the reliability, validity, accuracy, and utility of a new tool, PEDS: Developmental Milestones (PEDS:DM). Data from a nationally representative sample of 1619 children administered developmental diagnostic measures were mined for items that best predicted performance in each developmental domain. A total of 112 met inclusion criteria, that is, sensitivity/specificity > or = 70%. For each domain/age level (birth to 8 years of age), sensitivity to performance less than or equal to the 16th percentile on diagnostic measures was 83% and specificity was 84%. Reliability was high (test-retest, .98 to .99; interrater, .82 to .96; kappa, .81). The readability level was 1.8 grades (range 1.1 to 2.6). The PEDS:DM appears to be a validated, accurate alternative to informal milestones checklists that are a probable contributor to underdetection of children with delays and disabilities.
约16%的儿童患有发育行为障碍,但医疗保健人员仅检测出不到三分之一的此类儿童,这可能是因为使用了非正式的发育里程碑检查表。本研究的目的是确定一种新工具——儿科发育里程碑筛查工具(PEDS:DM)的可靠性、有效性、准确性和实用性。我们从全国范围内具有代表性的1619名接受发育诊断测量的儿童样本数据中挖掘出最能预测各发育领域表现的项目。共有112项符合纳入标准,即敏感性/特异性≥70%。对于每个领域/年龄组(出生至8岁),该工具对诊断测量中表现低于或等于第16百分位数的敏感性为83%,特异性为84%。可靠性较高(重测信度为0.98至0.99;评分者间信度为0.82至0.96;kappa值为0.81)。可读性水平为1.8年级(范围为1.1至2.6)。PEDS:DM似乎是一种经过验证的、准确的工具,可替代非正式的发育里程碑检查表,后者可能是导致发育迟缓及残疾儿童漏诊的原因之一。