Suppr超能文献

下丘脑背内侧核对于大鼠昼夜节律性食物预期活动的表达并非必需。

The dorsomedial hypothalamic nucleus is not necessary for the expression of circadian food-anticipatory activity in rats.

作者信息

Landry Glenn J, Yamakawa Glenn R, Webb Ian C, Mear Rhiannon J, Mistlberger Ralph E

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.

出版信息

J Biol Rhythms. 2007 Dec;22(6):467-78. doi: 10.1177/0748730407307804.

Abstract

Restricted daytime feeding generates food-anticipatory activity (FAA) by entrainment of a circadian pacemaker separate from the light-entrainable pacemaker located in the SCN. The dorsomedial hypothalamic nucleus (DMH) has been proposed as the site of food-entrainable oscillators critical for the expression of FAA, but another study found no effects of complete DMH ablation on FAA. To account for these different results, the authors examined methodological factors, including (1) cage configuration and feeding method and (2) use of social cues. Intact and DMH-ablated rats were maintained on one 4-h daily meal in the middle of the light period, using caging and feeding methods matching those of Gooley et al. (2006). Rats with partial or complete DMH ablation were less nocturnal during ad lib food access but exhibited normal FAA during restricted feeding, as quantified by FAA magnitude, ratios, latency to appearance, duration, and precision. To evaluate the use of social cues, intact rats naive to restricted-feeding schedules were food deprived for 72 h on 4 tests. Daytime activity increased during food deprivation, but the magnitude and waveform of this activity was not influenced by the presence of food-entrained rats exhibiting robust FAA in adjacent cages. Thus, hungry intact rats do not use social cues to anticipate a daily mealtime, suggesting that DMH-ablated rats do not anticipate meals by reacting to sounds from food-entrained intact rats in adjacent cabinets. These results confirm our previous finding that the DMH is not critical for normal expression of FAA in rats, and this observation is extended to food restriction methodologies used by other labs. The methodological differences that do underlie discrepant results remain unresolved, as does the location of food-entrainable oscillators, input pathways, and output pathways critical for FAA.

摘要

限时白天进食通过与位于视交叉上核(SCN)的光驱动起搏器分开的昼夜节律起搏器的同步化产生食物预期活动(FAA)。背内侧下丘脑核(DMH)被认为是对FAA表达至关重要的食物驱动振荡器的所在部位,但另一项研究发现完全切除DMH对FAA没有影响。为了解释这些不同的结果,作者研究了方法学因素,包括(1)饲养笼配置和喂食方法以及(2)社会线索的使用。完整和DMH切除的大鼠在光照期中间每天进食一餐,持续4小时,采用与古利等人(2006年)相匹配的饲养笼和喂食方法。部分或完全切除DMH的大鼠在自由进食期间夜间活动较少,但在限时喂食期间表现出正常的FAA,通过FAA幅度、比率、出现潜伏期、持续时间和精确性来量化。为了评估社会线索的使用,对限时喂食时间表不熟悉的完整大鼠在4次测试中禁食72小时。禁食期间白天活动增加,但这种活动的幅度和波形不受相邻笼子中表现出强烈FAA的食物驱动大鼠的存在的影响。因此,饥饿的完整大鼠不会利用社会线索来预期每日用餐时间,这表明切除DMH的大鼠不会通过对相邻柜子中食物驱动的完整大鼠的声音做出反应来预期用餐。这些结果证实了我们之前的发现,即DMH对大鼠FAA的正常表达并不关键,并且这一观察结果扩展到了其他实验室使用的食物限制方法。导致结果不一致的方法学差异仍未得到解决,对于FAA至关重要的食物驱动振荡器的位置、输入途径和输出途径也是如此。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验