Spoelstra Kamiel, Daan Serge
Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, 229 Guyot Hall, Washington Road, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA.
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2008 Mar;194(3):235-42. doi: 10.1007/s00359-007-0301-3. Epub 2007 Dec 4.
Mutations in each of the genes mPer1, mPer2, mCry1 and mCry2 separately cause deviations from the wild type circadian system. Differences between these mutant strains have inspired the hypothesis that the duality of circadian genes (two mPer and two mCry genes involved) is related to the existence of two components in the circadian oscillator (Daan et al., J Biol Rhythms 16:105-116, 2001). We tested the predictions from this theory that the circadian period (tau) lengthens under constant illumination (LL) in mCry1 and mPer1 mutant mice, while it shortens in mCry2 and mPer2 mutants. mCry1 ( -/- ) and mCry2 ( -/- ) knockout mice both consistently increased tau with increasing light intensity, as did wild type mice. With increasing illumination, rhythmicity is reduced in mCry1, mCry2 and mPer1, but not in mPer2 deficient mice. Results for mPer mutant mice are in agreement with data reported on these strains earlier by Steinlechner et al. (J Biol Rhythms 17:202-209, 2002), and also with the predictions from the model. The increase in cycle length of the circadian system by light in the mCry2 deficient mice violates the predictions. The model is thereby rejected: the mCry genes do not play a differential role, although the opposite responses of mPer mutants to light remain consistent with a functional Evening-Morning differentiation.
mPer1、mPer2、mCry1和mCry2这四个基因中的每一个发生突变,都会分别导致与野生型昼夜节律系统产生偏差。这些突变株之间的差异引发了一种假说,即昼夜节律基因的二元性(涉及两个mPer基因和两个mCry基因)与昼夜振荡器中两个组分的存在有关(达恩等人,《生物钟杂志》16:105 - 116,2001年)。我们检验了该理论的预测,即在持续光照(LL)条件下,mCry1和mPer1突变小鼠的昼夜周期(tau)会延长,而mCry2和mPer2突变小鼠的昼夜周期会缩短。mCry1( -/- )和mCry2( -/- )基因敲除小鼠的tau均随着光照强度的增加而持续增加,野生型小鼠也是如此。随着光照增加,mCry1、mCry2和mPer1的节律性降低,但mPer2缺陷小鼠的节律性未降低。mPer突变小鼠的结果与施泰因勒chner等人(《生物钟杂志》17:202 - 209,2002年)早期报道的这些品系的数据一致,也与该模型的预测一致。mCry2缺陷小鼠中光照导致的昼夜节律系统周期长度增加与预测不符。因此该模型被否定:mCry基因并未发挥不同的作用,尽管mPer突变体对光照的相反反应仍与功能性的早晚分化一致。